Reply With Quote
I heard that.
barry standing up for his bro
The team goes as far as MVPorker takes them.
We saw that in last years WCF and finals, re .
I heard that.
barry standing up for his bro
Blame, fault, loss, lackluster whatever this neegro is pure useless .
He was not in his NBA prime, age wise and bball wise maybe since he played for years but as far as the NBA goes his prime was really 05 and a few years after that, he was at his best then and what I would call his "Prime". He did have that bad ankle yes, he was coming back from that at the Worlds. 03 Manu was even col! He hit some big shots those playoffs in the 4th Q's and FT's along with Jackson to hold down the fort. I remember their barrage of threes at the end of game 6's, either one of them would step up and just start nailing them at key times. Clutch as .
He was 23 then. Primes generally are considered to be in the late twenties. His prime would have been probably 2008-2010 but his best years were probably 2010-2011 & 2011-2012.
Best case is to limit his minutes to 28-30. Pop isn't benching him.
Tony Parker is back to give the Spurs some direction (not particularly leadership in scoring or defense)....towards that goal...REPEAT!.
Thank you for waking him up from suckingdom.
On one hand, it's obvious that Parker needs to play well for the Spurs to reach their peak. On the other, people who think Parker's resurgence proves his worth are misunderstand. The Spurs were playing poorly because Parker was playing poorly. They would have won more if Tony had sat those games.
Naturally, if the highest-usage player on the team is playing at D-league level, the team is going to struggle..
Anyways, I like the way Parker has been playing lately, he's just playing his role and the team is moving the ball well..
Spurs doing just fine without parker
If Splitts regains his level and Patty heal up we good.
Backups are pretty bad right now. If all the PGs ever play up to their potential at the same time, it should be impressive.
John Barry is always wrong anyways
Parker doesn't need to regain his level, he just needs to not be a negative impact. Pass pass pass. Parker hurts this team when he takes too many shots.
Jon Barry, takes from a player.
7-7 when Parker didn't play
I doubt he'll get back to that peak level but TP in the last couple of weeks is gna be good enough
Hes a key role player. Barry was right in the sense that the team is much better when he plays like one instead of a bottom 5 player in the league.
Again, Parker is playing well in his role lately, I don't have a problem with him being a role player scorer, he's doing it at a high level..
Mills and Joseph look terrible, though, which is a bigger concern..seems like Patty can't play without being afraid that he'll get pulled..
Last 11 games: 19.6 PPG on 55% shooting...very high "role player" scoring.
Good take, you're really helping your credibility.
1. I meant his "role" is to just score, at this point, and occasionally drive and kick..not "he scores like a role player", obviously, you idiot
2. He's averaging only 8 FGAs per game in the past 3 Spurs wins, which is what I meant by "lately"
He's good in this role, where the ball moves, and he isn't asked to do too much, even with Manu out..
My only concern is that it took him 4 months as one of the worst players in the league just to reach the level he's at right now..hopefully he doesn't become ineffective in the playoffs like last year..
The Agenda forces every compliment to be backhanded. They can't help themselves.
inflated stats against ty compe ion tbh
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
