Yeah. OP has a set of kleenex right next to his bed. Will need more for the rest of the playoffs.![]()
Oh, did I say that? ok
Yeah. OP has a set of kleenex right next to his bed. Will need more for the rest of the playoffs.![]()
Come on we are having a little fun here, Jeff Ross was here himself roasting Manu in 2013, why cant Antonia have the same treatment?
Damn... what an absurd idea... to blame your best player the most when he had a tough night and his team lose and saying he will receive most of the credit when the team will win
A little fun would be a joke here and there.
This is a months-long spam campaign.
you still don't get it right ?![]()
If you don't see the difference between his post and the numerous, daily Parker threads...then okay.
Do you even know the formula for usage rate?
I suggest he is fed early and often, and by that I mean has plays called for him. You know like how he was during most of the 11 game winning streak. Look at the Denver/OKC/GS games for the ideal scenario.
You are right, but you gotta admit the memes are great.
Kleenex!!! Next to his bed!
![]()
The memes are fine.
The spam shtick was played out months ago.
"Unfortunately, though, Parker has also declined in several important ways. He’s never been a great rebounder, but he’s been absolutely dismal this season. On offense that’s a matter of Spurs strategy, but you can also see a sharp decline on the defensive end. Parker has historically been a better than average defensive rebounder for a point guard, but he’s much worse this year with a career low of 2.6 per 48 minutes.
The most worrisome aspect of his decline, though, is his passing. He’s having problems with both assists (which have gone down) and turnovers (which have gone up):"
"Not all measures agree with this assessment of the Spurs’ point guards (if you’re a diehard PER partisan, you’re not going to find this persuasive), but Parker and Joseph’s on/off court numbers this season support the case: ESPN’s on-court impact metric has Cory Joseph ranked a respectable 21stamong all NBA point guards, with Tony Parker coming in at 75. The Spurs just aren’t playing as well when Parker is on the floor.
This is in part because the things he’s doing poorly are important and would hurt any team, but they’re particularly bad for the Spurs. A point guard playing with Kawhi Leonard, Danny Green, and Tim Duncan doesn’t need to be the first scoring option, but he does need to be an excellent passer with a high assist to turnover ratio."
http://hardwoodparoxysm.com/2014/12/...k-tony-parker/
![]()
this dude Clipper Nation is my favorite.
You do know all you do is spam right? Like that is your go to move in every thread.
Tony criticism is valid because he has sucked the entire year and now continues in the post season got. This is a Spurs board right?
"Good to Great". Not Parker dribble dribble mid-range shot.
How many spam threads have I started in the past 24 hours?
Compare that number to yours and your krew's.
Quit spamming.
yes I know contrary to most of your krew
In % Kawhi has been the player who used most of team plays when on the floor. I suggest too he is fed early and often, I cannot agree more than that. I'm saying kawhi has had the ball plenty during game 1 you, apparently, think he has not. I'm using usage rate to back it up, you are saying it was not a "good" usage rate I guess so you are placing argumentation on eye test which I disagree with for game 1.
The offense wasn't ran through him and thus wasn't treated as the best offensive player by Pop. What part of that don't you understand? When it is ran through him and he falters then make this thread.
lol switching your argument
Whine about this in the numerous Rique threads then. It doesnt make sense to do it in this one.
You never learn.![]()
How many threads have you started in the last 24 hours?
So you don't understand the difference? ok
still deflecting I see...
dude just a heads up we agree, Parker sucks
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)