The Spurs were just never that dominant...always good but usually "right place, right time". They had an insane amount of luck (Amare/Diaw suspension, cramp game, etc). Throw in that their 99, 03, and 07 finals opponents had no business being in the finals. Its easy to understand why that luck wouldnt ever happen two years in a row.
No. Repeating matters. It shows a consistent level of maintained dominance. Case in point. Jordan is known for scoring, yet KAJ is the all-time leading scorer in NBA history. Both have 6 rangs. Media hate of KAJ aside, most fans outside of Laker Nation thinks he is GOAT. Why? Consistent level of dominance by 3peating twice as champion.
Now I think that flaws the GOAT argument, but I understand why the argument is being made.
Dominance matters. Repeating championships demonstrates that. Sp*rs haven't shown they are capable of such a feat.
* denotes NOT repeating as a true championship team should.
Last edited by LkrFan; 05-03-2015 at 11:55 AM.
^^da.
This got comes on ST talking about the Lakers when his team does bad, and when they finally get eliminated, he goes back to bashing
Lakers fans should just take away his fan card..
This got comes on ST talking about the Lakers when his team does bad, and when they finally get eliminated, he goes back to bashing
Lakers fans should just take away his fan card..
salty ass
tell us more about those suns le runs bro
Discrete Mathematics.
Probability and Determinism. Chris Paul has a pulled hammy and they STILL couldnt win. How much luck do you need?
Evidently, a lot.
Sucks that the Suns couldn't luck their way to a le, or 5.
Change your sig. Jared Dudley doesn't even play for the Suns anymore idiot.
Oh look, laker and suns fans trying to diminish the achievements of the greatest/ most successful franchise in professional sports over the last 2 decades.
Good thing nobody gives a about these meaningless opinions on a message board and the general public and all basketball experts still know that the Spurs are the greatest NBA team/overall team in professional sports the last 2 decades.
You couldn't even stand up for yourselves the past fortnight. You played like has beens.
20, you disgraced yourselves.
Team A: B2B2B, B2B, won H2H vs. Team B 4-2*
Team B: 5 scattered rangs, on the short end of 4-2 schtick, NEVER repeated
Sometimes 5 does not equal 5.
*Kobe didn't play during the last series loss to the Sp*rs
^^^ TRUTH. BTW ESPN, haven't watched in a while and won't start soon.Suns fans on ESPN message boards were still ing this year about 07 playoffs and how they were cheated, they never get over it. Spurs owned them so bad it still haunts them.
Team A: B2B2B, B2B, won H2H vs. Team B 4-2*
Team B: 5 scattered rangs, on the short end of 4-2 schtick, NEVER repeated
Sometimes 5 does not equal 5.
*Kobe didn't play during the last series loss to the Sp*rsIn the words of former President Bush "That's some fuzzy math."
Y'all DID cheat in 2007. If Horry didn't...you know the rest son.
Who wants to repeat anyways? Look at the franchises who repeated the past 15 years. Lakers turned into dog with Kobe demanding a trade and missing the playoffs and the 2nd time they did it they went to after. Look at them now, they're the laughing stock of the NBA and won't contend for a le for many years to come. The Heat went all out and had to bring together 3 superstars in their prime to repeat but what future do they have now? They may not ring in another 20 years. Spurs are tied with the Lakers for most les in the past 20 years. 18 consecutive playoff appearances, 16 50+ win seasons despite never signing a big name free agent or having a high draft pick. And guess what? They drafted the DPOY and a Finals MVP with the 15th pick in the 2011 draft.
Matters to whom? Re ed lakerfan minds?
That doesn't proof . You dont need to be repeating every year to show dominance.
This is only a phenomenon in the NBA. You dont see this kind of talk in other sports.
If you had it your way, would you rather have back to back les or 3..4 or more over a span of say 15 years? Answer should be a pretty easy one to make.
Repeating is an arbitrary concept.
Winning two out of three championships (W-L-W) is equally impressive as winning two and then losing one (W-W-L). Mathematically, they're the same. To suggest otherwise is irrational.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
