Good luck with those lottery balls Kool....
I got to 60% by virtue of the Lakers beating the Spurs directly or winning the le during a Spurs repeat attempt .
Nice analysis by Kool....
99 spurs win *
2000 the Lakers win le..
2003 spurs win
2004 Lakers beat Spurs
2005 Spurs win
2006 Lost to Dallas
2007 Spurs win
2008 Lost to Lakers
2014 Spurs win
2015 Spurs lose to LA
tim went out with an injury in 2000. didnt even play in the playoffs
either way, apparently a lockout le doesnt count according to you guys, so technically the lakers winning in 2000 doesn't matter regardless of tims injury cause if the spurs won in 2000 it still wouldn't be a repeat. No double standards
The pure definition of irrelevant is the Lakers
Time to go back to jacking off to pale white, no ass having Hathaway while watching those ping pong balls not falll your way again, kool.
thai ping pong?![]()
kobe repeated twice in the "poop and Jim era"
The only thing that matters...
99 spurs win
2000 the Lakers win le..
2003 spurs win
2004 Lakers beat Spurs
2005 Spurs win
2006 Lost to Dallas
2007 Spurs win
2008 Lost to Lakers
2014 Spurs win
2015 Spurs lose to LA
They won all their les on down years of the NBA
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)