Reply With Quote
technically speaking, its the gay community with the sticky asses
technically speaking, its the gay community with the sticky asses
tolerance doesn't mean you have to like it. everyone is en led to their opinions. but you cant say "i'm tolerant!" and then say "they shouldn't be allowed to marry." if you personally dont think gays should marry, thats your opinion and thats fine. nobody is forcing gay marriage upon you, and nobody is taking away your ability to marry a woman. but once you try to insert your opinion into somebody else's lifestyle (by trying to ban gay marriage), you are no longer being tolerant
"but once you try to insert your opinion"
... it's not "opinion", it's evagelical Bible humpers/Taliban trying legistlate the Bible and the hateful ethics, morals on everybody, where they have perversely interpreted the Bible to justify their hate, their excluisveness, much like the gun fellators, NRA/GOA/etc perversely interpret "militia" to mean EVERYONE ALL THE TIME ALL AGES EVERYWHERE BE ARMED TO DEFEND AGAINST THE FEDS.
it's an opinion, and you dont agree with it.
thats ok
Are you serious?
It must be from a gun forum. You wouldn't stonewall so seriously were it not.
America is a wimp when it comes to democracy. People yell Murica and put their hands over their hearts during the national anthem yet they're too scared to have nationwide votes on issues. Ireland had a nationwide vote on gay marriage and Scotland had a nationwide vote on independence from the UK. I just don't get it. Oh I know because gay activists would lose a popular vote so they get their way by activist judges.
You trying to fumble through things is sad, puto. Its typical that when you copy and paste other people's work you credit them with it. We both know you couldn't come up with that.sources
its the gay marriage ruling replaced with gun rights.
You are channelling that an inherent legal right is interchangeable with a license to carry a concealed handgun. What it sounds like is a CCL instructor gun nutter type who has no legal background but is determined to make everything about guns. Nutters don't seem to want to recognize how the courts have defended the right to bear arms and defend oneself as universal similar to how they just defended the right for anyone to choose who their family is.
So were those rainbow lights energy efficient? Were they "green"?
Do you know how the Cons ution works?
LED floods - so yes.
I don't think that. It's just a fact.You think I give a about what you think of me?
It would look right if the black guy were working a southern plantation cotton field in chains.
Where you from Blake? Texas???
The BlakeDumper combo ?
So when's Obama gonna sign an executive order to close Gitmo and end The Patriot Act and NDAA?
Someone with some sense answer this for me. Do liberals only care about two issues: gay rights and abortion?
You don't know anything about the Cons ution of the United States.
Why doesn't it bother you that muslims are killing sexuals by the handful? And if it does bother you, why are you so reluctant to discuss it?
Simply because it doesn't fit the anti-Christian narrative that you're trying to push?
I didn't think i needed the blue font
"The*fallacy of relative privation, or*appeal to bigger problems, is an*informal fallacy*in which it is suggested an opponent's arguments should be dismissed or ignored, on the grounds that more important problems exist, despite these issues being often completely unrelated to the subject at hand.
A well-known example of this fallacy is the response "but there are children*starving in Africa," with the implication that any issue less serious is not worthy of discussion......"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fall...tive_privation
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
