Reply With Quote
What sucks is if Tony does have another season like last year, we still won't be able to deal him b/c nobody in their right mind will take on that contract. We just really need him to bounce back, tbh.
--
Last edited by SuperCam; 10-14-2015 at 02:57 PM.
What sucks is if Tony does have another season like last year, we still won't be able to deal him b/c nobody in their right mind will take on that contract. We just really need him to bounce back, tbh.
Almost any team with a better starter has a better pg situation than us. Parker isn't top ten so there are quite a bit of teams ahead of us.
Our PG rotation sucks, honestly. But we don't need dominant PGs with our current lineup. If Parker loses the extra weight and regains his jump shot, we'll be okay. And with Ginobili and/or Diaw in the second unit, Patty doesn't need to be the playmaker.
I'd say slightly above average. Parker has mega corporate knowledge that'd make Westbrook head explode.
People act like westbrook has zero IQ. Parker last playoffs looked like a mentally re ed child.
So there are only like six contenders. Spurs can still be top ten.
Here are some specifics: better than:
Lullard and trash? Clarkson and Russell? Rondo and belli? Wall and beal? Mavs lol?
I hope Parker takes a huge Whataburger infused on all of us this year and gets back to himself..
No he looked like a middle age multi racial man. You're projecting.
Westbrook isn't dumb. But he's never learn the spurs offense.
Westbrook instead of porker gets us a 5peat easy. MVP candidate at a young age with a stacked team AND bench with a top 3 coach of all time.
So you think Parker withstands pressure well? If you're gonna make lame "Parker is Fat" jokes, try to get psi vs. density (pounds per cubic inch) right, or it just doesn't work well comedically. Fat isn't all that dense, anyway. Back to Fat Joke drawing board.
I can't wait to see Parker all over the ST haters when he has a bounce back year this season.
Westbrook
Paul
Curry
Wall
Lillard
Irving
Lowry
Bledsoe
Lawson
Evans
Teague
Conley
Walker
Jackson
Gragic
Knight
Parker 17
that's just starters right? I was talking about PG depth. Later I proposed to take all starting PG out of the discussion. Where do the Spurs 2 and 3 PG stack?
Thank you! First, I would like to thank all of the little people...
I'll get to thanking Parker later.
Mills plays wells as the second pg when Diaw or manu running the team. His shooting blends well. I like this kid as a young prospect. Has good vision and attacks, which we need from the pg, and with Aldridge and west now in the PnR, he will blend well I'm speculating.
Will be a good rotation for this type of team, that's for sure. One of the better in the league.
Lol. In all seriousness I firmly believe we're going to see a different Parker this upcoming season, but he was simply too dense (better?) for his own good last season.
At least... I hope so.
I'd rather have Mills and McCallum than any other point guards not listed so move the Spurs up the list as high as you want.
LMA will alleviate some offensive duties for porker. Porkers legs will be more rested next year. Maybe even pop benches him when we need too and we start winning more games.
Definitely better: Cleveland, Golden State, Clippers, Grizzlies, OKC, Toronto, Washington
Probably better: Atlanta, Portland
Subjective, but better IMO: Charlotte, Miami, New Orleans
Toss-up: Chicago, Denver, Detroit, Phoenix, Sacramento
Definitely worse: Brooklyn, Dallas, Houston, Indiana, Lakers, Milwaukee, Minnesota, New York, Orlando, Philly, Utah
I could see the Spurs as good as 13th if youre being really optimistic and as low as 19th if we're keeping it 100 IMO..
Way to stir the pot. Notice how all the player fans that are on here are also on your 'cursing on Spurstalk' thread?
You are a player fan. Don't get it twisted. Walk along now.
I agree. Hopefully he feels shamed by last season. Maybe come back with a retooled physique and a new, more team-first at ude.
That would be nice.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
