Reply With Quote
Cool. Thanks.
This has been covered already. See previous posts.
Cool. Thanks.
Right, you provided no other reasons.
Issue resolved.
No. Reread.
Goddammit, chump is getting his pushed in here too?
Reread.
You provided no reasons.
Issue resolved.
No, reread. It's pretty simple. You may get it. Keep reading until you do.
Click on thread
See Chump logging overtime playing 21 questions
Back to downstairs, I guess
Click on thread
See Chump logging overtime playing 21 questions
Back to downstairs, I guess
Whoa. Wow.!! Simmons is really good..
Nice composure there Becky!
You didn't panic when Brooklyn lead. :,tu
Nice D too Spurs.
Simmons, Lalanne, Anderson.
Spurs win a spot in the quarter finals !!!!
Reread. It's pretty simple. You provided no examples. You may do it at some point. Keep trying until you do.
I know you won't.
you missed the "keep rereading until you get it" portion of the conversation. It may get you stuck in an endless loop, but we're gonna have to go with that.
I already got it.
You failed to give any reasons to not pay $5 for Summer League Pass.
That's all I need to know.
You may not know that, but we're gonna have to go with that.
Nope. Still haven't gotten it. Missed almost ALL of it, actually. Back to the drawing board!
No need.
You failed. That's all that matters here.
Feel free to try again.
I failed, at explaining your errors to you. Only because I didn't try. That is correct. I failed.
You failed at many things. That is correct.
And that's OK.
True. No evidence is ever good enough anyway, for some. I have failed to convince moon landing deniers that we really landed on the moon. I take no discomfort in that.You failed at many things. That is correct.
And that's OK.
Any evidence would have worked here.
But you produced none.
Because I've witnessed the Chump in action. No evidence produced is acceptable. And you already refuted your original claim, coming up with one counterexample yourself, that disproved your original statement. Moving the goal posts, now asking for ADDITIONAL reasons why your initial statement was erroneous. There are more, but there need be only one, which you already conceded to. End of story. I have no further obligations, nor did I even have an initial one, which we've already discussed, but you don't understand.
I provided the one reason I could think of myself, and asked you for any other reasons.
Since you failed to produce any other reason, I can only conclude you failed to produce any other reason.
So in that case, you failed. You never had any obligations, but you failed anyway.
All you had to say was "That one thing you mentioned is the only thing I could think of." In which case, you would be agreeing with anyway, because that has nothing to do with the $5 I mentioned in the first place. I stand by my statement that if you don't have $5 to spend, you probably shouldn't be interneting. If you disagree, you can give your reasons and that can be discussed. So far you haven't.
You can only conclude that because you are good at making premature and faulty conclusions based upon your own inability to find additional reasons to the one that already proves you wrong. No problem.
And, why would I say that when there are so many others? I don't lie to make you feel better. But, i also don't spoonfeed you answers. You found one. Good job. I leave it as a thought exercise for you to find all the others. Just because you can't find them all doesn't mean there are not more. We've gone over this. But, congrats on finding the one. Again, I am not required to provide anything further for you to be incorrect.
One last comment, then you can have the last word. I will not revisit the topic. But, I will play reductio ad absurdum with you, and since you are so curious for answers, you can think about it. But, the statement that "if you don't have an extra $5.00 to spend on sporting websites, you probably shouldn't be on the internet" was so snarky and full of hubris...maybe after reductio ad absurdum, you may be able to find some people in between, maybe even billions, that may qualify as well. Probably not, given your past. But, maybe:
I introduce you to an entire class of people that probably don't have an extra $5.00 to spend on summer league games, yet still "internet", but probably shouldn't be, according to Chump.
http://www.biztechafrica.com/article.../#.VamG2Nm9LTo
That doesn't even begin to address the false premise that the reason he needed a link was that he couldn't afford the five dollars. There are all sorts of first world reasons and/or philosophical ones as to why someone doesn't buy the league pass. But, I have a feeling you won't accept anything provided, so I won't waste any more of my time.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
