Th'Playtex desperate to deflect from the huge Bernie took on that stage tonight.Not emotional. Just asking for clarification on where the resident fake libertarian stands. Thanks for continuing to display your inability to take any sort of a principled stand on anything.
Bernie? I simply asked you to say who you supported. Initially you said you were going to write in RonPaul, then you came out in support of Trump.
I asked you to clarify and you couldn't.
Now you're talking about Bernie Sanders.
You're obviously a ing moron who has no idea what you'r talking about, nor do you have the ability to formulate an intelligent opinion and defend it.
in short, you're an irrelevant time waste.
I liked O'Malley and Webb best, but they have no chance. Bernie says that makes the left moist, but his dream of turning America into Denmark or Sweden or (insert any uber white Euro socialist country here) is unhinged from reality.
is the JudeoMarxist still your first choice, then Shillary?
The Democrats need a professional black Witch to counter the Dr. Ben. She could boil white folk and cast spells while on the campaign trail. Counter Trump... I see a vagrant with a shopping cart slurring out whatever is on his mind, insulting Hillary's swollen ankles or something. The Democrats already have a candidate to match Nixon, Hillary was busy removing stuff, so the Dems ahead in that category.
Welcome Joe Biden into the race near future.
Cnn sets up fights for republicans and democrats a love fest
Donald Trump is my first choice, Bern Man is second, then Hillary.
For those missing Intrade, there's a new site doing basically the same thing:
https://www.predic .org/Browse/Group/53/President
What the does that second tweet even mean?
Thats the reverend Huckster so he is saying we in the US don't really have a problem with skin color. We have a problem with people just plain being naughty, sin.
The sin and skin played off against each other in such a clever evangelical way. Huckster has not met m>s,
Infinitely Limited, etc..
I don't know how anyone could watch Clinton's old tired ass. She's the worst Dem since Gore.
Look how bad a candidate 2012 Obama was though, and does the GOP have a candidate with as much appeal as Romney? That ing is probably going to get elected, this field is truly horrible on both sides.
They elected their token. You didn't think they were going to do it again did ya.
Sanders was a wimp in the debate. He basically licked Hillary's ass in the debate. He would bankrupt America with his free programs. O'Malley would be bankrupt America with solar and wind energy to fight evil climate change. Republicans would bankrupt America with more nation building. Oops, the Democrats would do that too. None of the dummies on stage talked about how Obama bombed a doctors without borders hospital in Afghanistan. This debate was a joke.
Waiting for the token Mexican/Latino, then the openly LGBT candidate (or whatever they're called) candidate etc. Anything to milk gender, race and sexuality to election victories. Surprised they just went all in with Hillary.
They'd hardly be 'free ' programs if they're being paid by an increase in tax dollars.
Actually, Chaffee brought up the hospital thing. It was ignored and quickly swept under the rug.
Right, yet that is how it is advertised.
On Bernie's website:
"It’s Time to Make College Tuition Free and Debt Free"
I was interested in seeing if Bernie even offered a budget but all I saw was a bunch of tax proposals that would be lucky to cover the current deficit let alone fund all of his additional programs.
The proposal is charging 50c on every $100 worth of stock trades:
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/ar...r-free-college
Does he have a full budget? I checked his senate page but only saw a bunch of tax/fee proposals. Does he plan on balancing the budget? If so, how? Stuff like that is very important.
According to the WSJ his new proposals would increase spending by $18 trillion over 10 years and his taxes/fees only bring in $6.5 trillion I just don't see how that is sustainable at all when current spending can't even be funded. You can only tax the rich so much before they're no longer rich.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/price-ta...ion-1442271511
"the WSJ his new proposals would increase spending by $18 trillion over 10 years"
... 18 has been debunked by many sources. WSJ is political toilet paper,
the question "do you think a democratic socialist can win the Presidency" was stupid, was a "personality" question, but that's how Americans vote, superficially, emotionally.
the question should have been, and will never be, "do you think your programs and policies can win the Presidency". (classic) socialism isn't in the picture.
Hillary's oppo "Sanders voted against the Brady bill 5 times" should have been answer "I get a D- grade from the NRA"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
