Reply With Quote
I've already exposed dabom....no need to continue on with this nonsense.
But you have an ID right? Maybe some school records? Stupid .
I've already exposed dabom....no need to continue on with this nonsense.
Exposed yourself for not having an EIT.
None of that proves a negative.But you have an ID right? Maybe some school records? Stupid .
Why have you not provided any proof you aren't a child molester?
You must be a child molester then.
Never a good time to go full re .
You have done nothing to prove you aren't a child molester.Never a good time to go full re .
Why not?
Why do people get sucked into these vacuous "debates" with Chump? I just wasted a couple of hours doing the same. I should know better. Wears you down by repe ion.
The way it went with you is the same way it went here.
1) Find a simple question you won't answer because it will undermine your stated position.
2) Watch you do everything in your power to avoid answering that simple question.
All you had to do was actually answer two simple questions.
I have always wondered that as well lol. If you get into an argument with Chump that is at least stretching 3 pages and there is no winner. Pretty similar to arguing with the Dafakengineer. Xmas was the worst about getting suckered into those. I remember before I got post here and could only view the forum Chump would sucker xmas into arguing with him until like 3 in the morning
I have always wondered that as well lol. If you get into an argument with Chump that is at least stretching 3 pages and there is no winner. Pretty similar to arguing with the Dafakengineer. Xmas was the worst about getting suckered into those. I remember before I got post here and could only view the forum Chump would sucker xmas into arguing with him until like 3 in the morning
He's already trying to bait me into round 2.
Nah, I'll just wait til you post some bull in the political forum again, ask you simple questions about it and watch you stonewall yet again.He's already trying to bait me into round 2.
i'll take your bet, Cosilapa. If Deeps doesn't want to hold the money I suggest midnightpulp he's trustworthy
Well, it seems like you're gonna lose your money...
We watched regular season rotations in this game and Kawhi played a more traditional Spurs wing role by design, parking in the corner and taking more three points shots than 2s...back to his role in 2012 so there is no way he can score more than 12 ppg.
His defense'll regress too, he'll lose his confidence 'cause he doesn't fit into the three point shooter role and looks lost on both ends.
RIP Kawhi
Don't worry bro..Well, it seems like you're gonna lose your money...
We watched regular season rotations in this game and Kawhi played a more traditional Spurs wing role by design, parking in the corner and taking more three points shots than 2s...back to his role in 2012 so there is no way he can score more than 12 ppg.
His defense'll regress too, he'll lose his confidence 'cause he doesn't fit into the three point shooter role and looks lost on both ends.
RIP Kawhi
I'm not worried, the team look so good tonight. Also, Kawhi in a limited role can help to improve Anderson.
Where can I bet the under and with who?
That's not going to happen..Relax it's preseason game..
21+
If you don't mind betting with a known welcher with 0 credibility go for it. Personally I wouldn't waste my time.
midnightpulp
take my and Splits 100's....
C'mon...Do you not like my best Kawhi's hater impersonation?
Last edited by YGWHI; 10-23-2015 at 11:56 PM.
bump..
it is looking good after game 1
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions