why is that when Kawhi dominates (>= 18FGAs), 4 out of 10 times the spurs lose...

[ElNono]

At least this thread is engaging a discussion with some numbers and facts unlike certain other threads throwing random numbers out there not even backed up

I'm only here to talk basketball, tbh...

[Hoops Czar]

point taken bra I should have mentioned Duncan era... Sorry

No problem.

[K...]

True dat. Ya know, a lot of part time bandwagoners here actually think the Spurs franchise started back in 1997 because that's when they climbed aboard. However, the franchise has actually been in existence since 1968.

It's even worse! At least the 1997 bandwagon fans appreciate the big three. The millennial s thinks it's all only kawhi. You watch, as soon as Duncan retires your gonna hear people say Leonard> Duncan.

[Brazil]

I'm only here to talk basketball, tbh...

almost

[lilbthebasedgod]

This is bad statistics. What is the sample size? You have to check for that to calculate in uncertainty.

[dabom]

This thread.

[dabom]

OP a got per par. And I'm glad Tony is averaging less than 10 shots a game.

[apalisoc_9]

This thread.

[dabom]

This is bump material if I've ever seen one.

[Refocus]

ing lol'd.

[Brazil]

This thread.

you are so trash and useless.. you did not use got it's already something

[Brazil]

don't make me bump the thread where I got you blatantly lying tbh

why a new age fan, guru of advanced metrics, hating on the 80s would lie 80% on a message board tbh ?

[dabom]

you are so trash and useless.. you did not use got it's already something

This thread is trash and useless. Stay mad got.

[TrainOfThought5]

It's even worse! At least the 1997 bandwagon fans appreciate the big three. The millennial s thinks it's all only kawhi. You watch, as soon as Duncan retires your gonna hear people say Leonard> Duncan.

Millenial s ?? LMAO i think youre being a little tough on the kids. They cant help when they were born. And yeah, i hate NASF too, but Duncan has been playing great for so long (those 2013 finals numbers were INSANE for his age) that i think mollenials have a good appreciation for what Duncan is, and how he great hes been.

[Brazil]

you know what is funny ?

Spurs are 14-3 so far .824

Kawhi had 6 games in which his FGAs were >= 18, we lost 3 of those 6 games... so ya in 2015, thread le should why is that when Kawhi dominates (>=18 FGAs), 1 out of 2 the spurs lose...

Dabom come here and spin dat

[Brazil]

This thread is trash and useless. Stay mad got.

50% got

[dabom]

you know what is funny ?

Spurs are 14-3 so far .824

Kawhi had 6 games in which his FGAs were >= 18, we lost 3 of those 6 games... so ya in 2015, thread le should why is that when Kawhi dominates (>=18 FGAs), 1 out of 2 the spurs lose...

Dabom come here and spin dat

Spurs are 10/13 when Kawhi shoots 15 FGA or more. That's on pace for a 63 win season. Stay mad got.

I'm glad when Kawhi dominates and Tony is a role player. Said this last year.

FYI kawhi had 25,8,1,1,1 games those 3 lost games

Lost versus OKC which he completely dominated Durant.

Lost versus Washington. Tony can't defend worth against a good backcourt.

Lost vs the Pelicans. I don't even know what happened there.

OP never applies context to anything ever.

[Mel_13]

you know what is funny ?

Spurs are 14-3 so far .824

Kawhi had 6 games in which his FGAs were >= 18, we lost 3 of those 6 games... so ya in 2015, thread le should why is that when Kawhi dominates (>=18 FGAs), 1 out of 2 the spurs lose...

Dabom come here and spin dat

You can do even better if your goal is maximum krew reaction:

Kawhi Leonard has at least 18 FGAs in 100% of Spurs losses this season.

[Brazil]

Spurs are 10/13 when Kawhi shoots 15 FGA or more. That's on pace for a 63 win season. Stay mad got.

I'm glad when Kawhi dominates and Tony is a role player. Said this last year.

FYI kawhi had 25,8,1,1,1 games those 3 lost games

Lost versus OKC which he completely dominated Durant.

Lost versus Washington. Tony can't defend worth against a good backcourt.

Lost vs the Pelicans. I don't even know what happened there.

OP never applies context to anything ever.

got you bumped my thread, I did not ask for this so now you don't change the criteria... you were making fun of this thread with its >=18 FGAs, deal with it. When Kawhi took >= 18 it gave the 3 losses of the season for only 3 wins...

If you go 15 FGAs, I'd say yes when spurs offense is more distibuted and Kawhi FGAs are in check, Spurs are 100% for one one. For two I go to the strictly > 18 FGAs, Spurs are 3 losses on 3 games.

if you think this thread useless and trash you should think also Apo thread about parker dominating offense is even more thrash and useless...

double standard

Dude really I'm sorry this bump back fired so badly I had not checked this stuff... I spit my coffee on my screen when I checked this season number with the >= 18 FGAs... too good to be true... boy dat as whipping

[dabom]

got you bumped my thread, I did not ask for this so now you don't change the criteria... you were making fun of this thread with its >=18 FGAs, deal with it. When Kawhi took >= 18 it gave the 3 losses of the season for only 3 wins...

If you go 15 FGAs, I'd say yes when spurs offense is more distibuted and Kawhi FGAs are in check, Spurs are 100% for one one. For two I go to the strictly > 18 FGAs, Spurs are 3 losses on 3 games.

if you think this thread useless and trash you should think also Apo thread about parker dominating offense is even more thrash and useless...

double standard

Dude really I'm sorry this bump back fired so badly I had not checked this stuff... I spit my coffee on my screen when I checked this season number with the >= 18 FGAs... too good to be true... boy dat as whipping

I was laughing at the "correlation equals causation" you imply.

Those loses aren't on Kawhi got. Watch basketball next time.

[Wildcat67]

This is a false correlation OP.

Of course in the close difficult games (losses) our star player is going to play more and take more shots.

A higher amount of FGA is the result of a close loss, not a loss as a result of high FGA.

[dabom]

This is a false correlation OP.

Of course in the close difficult games (losses) our star player is going to play more and take more shots.

A higher amount of FGA is the result of a close loss, not a loss as a result of high FGA.

OP just getting owned per par.

[Brazil]

This is a false correlation OP.

Of course in the close difficult games (losses) our star player is going to play more and take more shots.

A higher amount of FGA is the result of a close loss, not a loss as a result of high FGA.

tell that to the krew, they created about parker dominating offense before this one when btw Parker had 80% win

[Brazil]

I was laughing at the "correlation equals causation" you imply.

Those loses aren't on Kawhi got. Watch basketball next time.

go laugh on Apo's thread got...

double standard
50%
bump backfiring
ass whipping

[Hoops Czar]

Nothing to see here, dabom getting p'wned in another thread.