Reply With Quote
Had you ever called out krew members for insulting Parker and LMA, I might not doubt your sincerity.
Nah. I just find it surprising that the mods allow trolls here to insult our players. I understand some trolling not the "re ed kid" thing...That's all.
Had you ever called out krew members for insulting Parker and LMA, I might not doubt your sincerity.
In the OP? I read OP and says Kawhi taking less shots, says something about Parker too? Weird.
Yes, Parker is mentioned too.
You can tell because he uses the word "Parker."
It's been more counterproductive then anything.
Thing is I usually just call it out rather then resort to hating on parker or aldridge (seemingly it's 2 favorite players) to counter it's kawhi hate.
I never called Parker Porker, never wished him an injury, and I always say LMA is a DREAM addition...so better you don't doubt my sincerity.
But that's it all? Why do you try to justify a guy calling Kawhi re ed because other called Parker Porker?
He's not better than the others guys. In fact, he's a disgrace to this board.
Yet you never call out the Parker/LMA hate. Do you find it productive?
I'll give OP and this thread a second read then...
I see those with the constant kawhi hate typically get away it.
Calling kawhi kawitism or calling him re ed and mocking him for it is low. greatcuck is guilty of contributing to that garbage.
How? You and the krew jump on every single instance.
And barely anyone else.Calling kawhi kawitism or calling him re ed and mocking him for it is low. greatcuck is guilty of contributing to that garbage.
You're really sensitive about the insults directed at Kawhi but no one else really.
Why is that?
Still don't get this...Why should the Spurs fans celebrate that the player, who has been great from just about any spot on the court, shooting better than the rest of our guys, is getting 3.3 fewer shots per game?But my player!
Not sure since when if your most efficient player has fewer shots that's good for the team and sustainable in the long run.
Kawhi's still a far ways away from being a finished product on the offensive end.
We can all agree that it's so hard to develop a player if he doesn't have the ball in his hands very often...Kawhi getting more touches would help to continue developing him on that end.
Developing Kawhi isn't about him as individual player, it's about him helping the Spurs to win games and les being the best player that he can be if they play him to his strengths...
Getting less and less opportunities (3.3 FGA in the Spurs offensive system is a strong number) to improve him doesn't seem the way.
Agree. It's weird/funny that the hot hand concept never applies to Kawhi. He was shooting so well and still couldn't get the ball to create for himself or others.
Team is doing much better overall and you are whining about your player's individual stats.
I don't expect you to ever get it.
Of course I do. If not who else will? Or will they just be left to continue their hate?
Which is why I call that clown out only.
Do you feel mocking someone's supposed condition is ok?
Well, I don't expect you to understand that can't be sustainable in the long run. I can't help if you think the Spurs shouldn't continue to develop Kawhi on offense, or if you think the best thing for them is having a passive Kawhi on that end.
Your entire krew jumps on every perceived insult.
Your a real hypocrite about it. You don't call out anyone else for insulting other players.Do you feel mocking someone's supposed condition is ok?
I can't help it if you build straw man after straw man to try to justify your whining about your player; I can only point out your making straw men.
The team's offense needs to be developed. You will never understand this because you only care about one player's stats.
Calling other people hypocrite...Like you call out someone for insulting Kawhi on those threads.
I have.Calling other people hypocrite...Like you call out someone for insulting Kawhi on those threads.
Several times.
So you can shut up about that.
What is more sustainable during the long run, a team effort (2014 championship) or Kawhi carrying the team throughout a full 7 game series? I can't recall Kawhi pulling together a great 7 game series tbh, 3-4 games yes but not a series. He's not consistent enough.
Can you give us a ratio between the two?
a-Obviously Kawhi is MY player, like Tim, Patty, Manu, every Spurs player.
b-If a true fan wants the best for his team, he expects they keep continue developing his best young player.
c-I don't care if Kawhi scores less, but if he gets less touches frezzing his improvement on that end...that would care everyone. Not sure why you give a about Kawhi's development.
This troll acts like Kawhi wasn't the best player and the leading scorer in the last three games of the Finals.
If we have learned one thing from 2014 WCF and Finals is we can't have a passive Kawhi on the offensive end.
Thanks for completely avoiding the question. So, 3 games = championship run?
Kawhi isn't consistent in the playoffs and it hurts you.
Kawhi's minutes have gone down from 35 to 32, so that factors in a bit. Also opposing teams are more focused on stopping Kawhi now than they were last month so naturally that will result in fewer shots.
If we look at it from a per 48
November: 29.9 pp48 10.3 rp48 3.7 ap48 2.5 sp48 1.7 bp48 1.5 tp48
December: 28.7 pp48 10.5 rp48 4.9 ap48 3.4 sp48 0.9 bp48 1.4 tp48
Kawhi's FG% is a bit lower and he's taking fewer shots but he is also getting more FTA (up from 4.4 per 48 to 6.7). His 3pas are about the same and he's still shooting 49%.
If we factor in Kawhi's lower FG% he'd be averaging 29.5 pp48.
So really if Kawhi was shooting as well as he did in November Kawhi would be scoring at practically the same rate but just more efficiently.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
