Still fantasizing about another man's weight![]()
That isn't fantasy. He said he had a knee replacement.
http://www.medpagetoday.com/Surgery/Orthopedics/38786Patients who undergo total knee replacement are at substantial risk for weight gain during the 5 years after the surgery, a large retrospective study showed.
On an adjusted multivariable analysis, recipients of knee arthroplasty were 60% more likely to gain 5% or more of their baseline body weight than matched controls who did not have the procedure (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.2, P=0.003), according to Daniel L. Riddle, PhD, of Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond, and colleagues.
And the chance of that "clinically important" weight gain doubled for individuals who had a second arthroplasty during the subsequent 5 years (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.4 to 3.1, P<0.001), the researchers reported in the May Arthritis Care & Research.
"The logical assumption may be that persons who are overweight or obese prior to surgery are more likely to lose weight following surgery. Because there is less pain and improved mobility, the impediments to increased activity and exercise are eased following surgery, and weight loss would logically follow," they observed.
However, that hasn't been the case consistently in previous studies, which have been hampered by short follow-up times and a lack of controls.
He does have poor impulse control. It is what it is.
Still fantasizing about another man's weight![]()
And this is why I stopped responding in real time. You see it and are now deflecting. You get no more dopamine from me though, weirdo.
Wow. I was hoping for a mildly interesting discussion about whether these asshats were going to be charged with sedition or not...
(sighs)
Looks like a case of armed rebellion to me.
Just about any other government in the world would be sending in the army. I can see it now... let the asshats plunk away at an Abrams or two with their peashooters. Run over their trucks and laugh at them.
That is actually a good question. I wonder if that would give a hunter with a permit a cause of action to sue the rancher.
Sounds a bit like the rancher was deciding for everybody else what the best use of that public land was for, and deciding it in such a way as to benefit himself financially at the expense of other stakeholders.
Yeah, this little maggot keeps talking smack about my (his) imaginary weight problem. Pretty bizarre. It's classic elementary school bull .
There are some accounts such as this one where I will actually argue on merit so I apologize for mucking up the thread.
The thing that gets me is that this is an issue of enforcement that comes down to a direct act of Obama. Our local GOP stooges seem completely lots to this notion. Instead they try and deflect. I guess they identify with the seditionists.
It certainly is childish but you lack introspection into your own role. You decided to fantasize about me and have been flailing about my home and income for a year now. I am just showing you that insults are actually effective when they are based off of truth. I'm rubbing your face in the notion because you are perhaps the most willfully ignorant person this side of Wild Cobra.
You did say you had a knee replacement and I jsut linked a study demonstrating the dynamic I am talking about. Your poor impulse control continues to be on display. You don't even argue points but instead whine that I am making them. Childish indeed, fatty.
I agree. These outside agitators (Bundy, etc.) are even stupider than Fuzzy Lumpkins. I can agree that the ranchers got ed by the BLM without agreeing with these idiots occupying that center.
It takes rubbing your face in it but you always come around.
Not a single person in this thread is supporting the militia take over of the government building. You'd have known that if you'd pay attention and stop talking about other poster's weights.
you, asshole. My position on these outside agitators has never changed. You are just making up again. Ignorant arrogant little prick.
TheSanityAnnex
whatdifferencedoesitmake?
This message is hidden because TheSanityAnnex is on your ignore list.
View Post
Remove user from ignore list
I have sufficient impulse control for this task. You can always try quoting me and including your message in a few words cause of the notification system.
Sorry that you get so mad when your challenged on your opinions. It still is what it is.
Or not.
(j1) The next day federal agents went to the Harney County Sheriff's office and filled a police report making accusation against Dwight and Steven Hammond for starting the backfire. A few days after the backfire a Range-Con from the Burns District BLM office asked Steven if he would meet him in town (Frenchglen) for coffee. Steven accepted. When leaving he was arrested by the Harney County Sheriff Dave Glerup and BLM Ranger Orr. Sheriff Glerup then ordered him to go to the ranch and bring back his father. Both Dwight and Steven were booked and on multiple Oregon State charges. The Harney County District Attorney reviewed the accusation, evidence and charges, and determined that the accusations against Dwight & Steven Hammond did not warrant prosecution and dropped all the charges.
Fast forward 5 years
(n) During the trial proceedings, Federal Court Judge Michael Hogan did not allow time for certain testimonies and evidence into the trail that would exonerate the Hammonds. Federal prosecuting attorney, Frank Papagni, was given full access for 6 days. He had ample time to use any evidence or testimony that strengthened the demonization of the Hammonds. The Hammonds attorney was only allowed 1 day. Much of the facts about the fires, land and why the Hammonds acted the way they did was not allowed into the proceedings and was not heard by the jury. For example, Judge Hogan did not allow time for the jury to hear or review certified scientific findings that the fires improved the health and productivity of the land. Or, that the Hammonds had been subject to vindictive behavior by multiple federal agencies for years.
(o) Federal attorneys, Frank Papagni, hunted down a witness that was not mentally capable to be a credible witness. Dusty Hammond (grandson and nephew) testified that Steven told him to start a fire. He was 13 at the time and 24 when he testified (11 years later). At 24 Dusty had been suffering with mental problems for many years. He had estranged his family including his mother. Judge Hogan noted that Dusty’s memories as a 13-year-old boy were not clear or credible. He allowed the prosecution to continually use Dusty’s testimony anyway. When speaking to the Hammonds about this testimony, they understood that Dusty was manipulated and expressed nothing but love for their troubled grandson.
You are a ing idiot. The fire had nothing to do with the outside agitators taking over the building. Knowing the rancher is getting persecuted by the BLM does not mean I support these militia idiots.
Two very separate issues that some posters are having trouble grasping and discussing.
Mostly little Fuzzy, the forum idiot.
I think it's sort of humorous if they just let the Bundy offspring sit there. Not let anyone in.
Now if they had a Qiran on the premises they might get blowed up.
When the honkeys came to steal the native americans land , they slaughtered the buffalo to squeeze them out and off their ancestral lands as well . Im happy for every white honkey that gets kicked off his so called 'property' .
No, we can't have any innocent Douglas Fir die as collateral damage.
Just let them go hungry.
Stupid honkeys make my ing day with these boohoo oppressed little ol me EMO videos. Lord, let this devil drink himself to sleep like they do to themselves nowadays lol
MaryKah!lol
You said complete fabricated lie. Your hair splitting is adorable, fatty. The Bundy people are there on the strength of your position.
Funny thing is, I haven't head squat about this here in Oregon. Must not be newsworthy here.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)