Page 7 of 45 FirstFirst ... 3456789101117 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 175 of 1110
  1. #151
    Veteran szkorhetz's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Post Count
    2,128
    Marc Gasol will possibly miss the remainder of the season with a broken foot.

    I can easily see Memphis blow the team up.

  2. #152
    Veteran sasaint's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    14,298
    Too early, but I'm hoping that Vasquez gets bought out after the deadline. He'd be good Manu insurance. The could waive McCallum or Bonner to make room.
    If the Bucks succeed in moving MCW, do you also expect them to buy out Vasquez? I haven't seen him play enough but his 3pt % and PER are not really great. Don't really see that we would have a lot of interest. Good size, but poor shooter it seems. Don't think I would be willing to get rid of either McCallum or Bonner for him - unless Bonner really is done.

  3. #153
    Veteran spursistan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    14,864

  4. #154
    Every game is game 1 Seventyniner's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    10,608
    If the Bucks succeed in moving MCW, do you also expect them to buy out Vasquez? I haven't seen him play enough but his 3pt % and PER are not really great. Don't really see that we would have a lot of interest. Good size, but poor shooter it seems. Don't think I would be willing to get rid of either McCallum or Bonner for him - unless Bonner really is done.
    I think it's more likely they buy out Vazquez if they don't move MCW.

  5. #155
    Veteran Spurs9's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    7,081
    I called it tbh

  6. #156
    Veteran ace3g's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    40,447
    Jared Dudley Verified account ‏@JaredDudley619

    Enjoy some peace and calm until tomorrow morning when you will hear a 100 trade rumors lol.. #nbatradedeadline

  7. #157
    Veteran ace3g's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    40,447
    Just randomly saw this tonight on twitter. It had my curiosity until I clicked the link. Doesn't mention "according to sources" or anything along those lines.


  8. #158
    I will not be mishandled MI21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    6,884
    Just randomly saw this tonight on twitter. It had my curiosity until I clicked the link. Doesn't mention "according to sources" or anything along those lines.



    Spurs going with the Parker, Leonard, Horford, Aldridge, Duncan mega size team - I don't think so.

  9. #159
    Hope springs eternal. SAGirl's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    27,774
    Just randomly saw this tonight on twitter. It had my curiosity until I clicked the link. Doesn't mention "according to sources" or anything along those lines.

    it would make sense if the Timmy knee issue is old age and not going away. It would mean Timmy is retiring for sure. I will leave others to sort this out bc I am not great with contract issues at all. Danny must f or sure be coveted now that he found his groove back.

  10. #160
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    265
    Just randomly saw this tonight on twitter. It had my curiosity until I clicked the link. Doesn't mention "according to sources" or anything along those lines.

    Won't put any stock into this. Site is based off of utilizing the ESPN Trade Machine.

  11. #161
    Veteran BG_Spurs_Fan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    5,931
    No chance. Atlanta would get much better offers for him.

  12. #162
    Starter off the bench Uriel's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Post Count
    9,483
    Just randomly saw this tonight on twitter. It had my curiosity until I clicked the link. Doesn't mention "according to sources" or anything along those lines.


  13. #163
    Starter off the bench Uriel's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Post Count
    9,483
    No chance. Atlanta would get much better offers for him.
    And even if they didn't, I'm not exactly sure this is a good trade for the Spurs. The frontline is already the best frontcourt in the NBA; no need to inflate it further, especially if it comes at the expense of our starting SG.

  14. #164
    Veteran BG_Spurs_Fan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    5,931
    And even if they didn't, I'm not exactly sure this is a good trade for the Spurs. The frontline is already the best frontcourt in the NBA; no need to inflate it further, especially if it comes at the expense of our starting SG.
    Spurs would bite their hands off on something like Horford + Korver for Danny Green + Boris + picks, if only for the talent upgrade, however, a team like Boston could easily outbid the Spurs.

  15. #165
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    7,288
    Does not make sense since Green has a no-trade clause.

    I would trade Aldridge for Horford and Korver. Spurs need a quicker center.

  16. #166
    Veteran BG_Spurs_Fan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    5,931
    Does not make sense since Green has a no-trade clause.
    No.

  17. #167
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    Spurs would bite their hands off on something like Horford + Korver for Danny Green + Boris + picks, if only for the talent upgrade, however, a team like Boston could easily outbid the Spurs.
    From what I've been reading, Boston is trying to low-ball the out of Atlanta right now. They don't even want to give up Jae Crowder for him. And all three of the Brooklyn picks are off the table. As I mentioned before, it seems like Horford's value is depressed enough to where the Spurs are going to be able to make a compe ive offer if they so choose.

    That said, they shouldn't offer any starter for Horford. He's not an upgrade to the team if they just create another hole. That's even more true when you consider that Horford is probably not going to help them get over the hump against Golden State. You don't trade your best guard defender for a big when you're already going to have to play small. That just doesn't make sense. And the Spurs haven't been a team that trades production/chemistry for talent. Add in the fact that Horford would probably take too long to integrate, and I see this as an off-season move at best.

  18. #168
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    Does not make sense since Green has a no-trade clause.
    You MFer.

  19. #169
    Defense Wins Championships Texas_Ranger's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    13,364
    if they are stupid enough to take Green for Horford, why not just try and get him for Bonner. @ this trade. The Spurs don't need bigs, but they do need a bigger PG.

  20. #170
    Veteran BG_Spurs_Fan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    5,931
    From what I've been reading, Boston is trying to low-ball the out of Atlanta right now. They don't even want to give up Jae Crowder for him. And all three of the Brooklyn picks are off the table. As I mentioned before, it seems like Horford's value is depressed enough to where the Spurs are going to be able to make a compe ive offer if they so choose.

    That said, they shouldn't offer any starter for Horford. He's not an upgrade to the team if they just create another hole. That's even more true when you consider that Horford is probably not going to help them get over the hump against Golden State. You don't trade your best guard defender for a big when you're already going to have to play small. That just doesn't make sense. And the Spurs haven't been a team that trades production/chemistry for talent. Add in the fact that Horford would probably take too long to integrate, and I see this as an off-season move at best.
    I agree with everything about fit, timing, etc. It's true of course, however, in my opinion the talent upgrade would be too significant for the Spurs to pass on such a trade. They'd obviously be confident of re-signing him if they pull the trigger. 2017 cap space spent a year earlier, in a sense. They've done that.

    Ainge is smart though, he's not going to lowball himself out of Horford's sweepstakes. He's doing it because he knows he's in pole position, but on trade deadline day I'm sure he'd be OK giving them a compe ive offer to get it done. In any case whatever Atlanta get it'd be 50 cents on the dollar anyway.

  21. #171
    SA fan since 03 playoffs spursparker9's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Post Count
    6,972
    Is Danny hopeless already?

  22. #172
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    I agree with everything about fit, timing, etc. It's true of course, however, in my opinion the talent upgrade would be too significant for the Spurs to pass on such a trade. They'd obviously be confident of re-signing him if they pull the trigger. 2017 cap space spent a year earlier, in a sense. They've done that.
    It wouldn't be too significant. It would concede this year to the Warriors while leaving them with the MLE to replace their starting two. The Spurs are good enough to win a championship this year; you don't waste Tim's last chance(s) for Hoford. And the point of 2017 cap space is to add to their core. Swapping out Green for Horford is limiting their flexibility, not expanding it.

    Ainge is smart though, he's not going to lowball himself out of Horford's sweepstakes. He's doing it because he knows he's in pole position, but on trade deadline day I'm sure he'd be OK giving them a compe ive offer to get it done. In any case whatever Atlanta get it'd be 50 cents on the dollar anyway.
    Ainge has had some terrific assets over the recent years, and he still has nothing to show for them other than some good-but-not-great players. I don't know that he would be willing to part with the premium assets for Horford, and I don't even know if he should. Atlanta doesn't want to tank; they has the second-longest playoff streak in the league and want to maintain that. So they want actual rotation guys for Al. It might not make sense for Boston to offer guys like Bradley and Crowder if they don't think they can replace them, because Horford may not want to stay on a roster that doesn't have good talent. The Brooklyn picks are valuable enough, but the Hawks are pretty bad at drafting, so I could see them not wanting those too badly.

  23. #173
    2 Doors Down BillMc's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Post Count
    20,599
    I agree we shouldn't do this. (If its still there in the summer that could be different). If the Spurs were seriously considering it, I would think that means 1) Timmy is done. 2) They think Simmons is ready for a bigger role.

    Probably just a baseless rumor. Or RC being polite enough to take Bud's calls.

  24. #174
    Veteran Russo21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    2,945
    Baseless rumour but the Spurs would do that in a heartbeat. Simmons and Butler are doing ok to play at SG instead of Danny.

    This is possibly Tim's last season, or if he plays next year he'll play all games and probably only 15mins per game in the games he actually does play. Imagine a prime Leonard, Aldridge and Horford front court, watch out NBA for years to come!

    If you can steal a player like Horford for Green you do it immediately and work the rest of the roster out as best you can. Oh and the Hawks have a descent front office, no way they do this.

  25. #175
    Veteran Maddog's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    2,057
    I agree we shouldn't do this. (If its still there in the summer that could be different). If the Spurs were seriously considering it, I would think that means 1) Timmy is done. 2) They think Simmons is ready for a bigger role.

    Probably just a baseless rumor. Or RC being polite enough to take Bud's calls.
    Baseless rumor
    1. Hawks can do better
    2. Simmons not ready (love em but not quite there yet)
    And maybe it's me, but not a big Horford fan don't think he adds a lot to the team...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •