Bill Clinton slams Obama's presidency

[TheSanityAnnex]

They are free to prove whatever claims they have as well.

spurraider is trying to help you, even though he stumbled right out of the gate.

Why do you continue to withhold information?

[ChumpDumper]

Why do you continue to withhold information?

I asked you to prove your claim, that's all.

There's no conspiracy here, cosmored.

[spurraider21]

You got those mixed up.

lol "pretty clear"

please clarify, as you seem to be on top of it

[TheSanityAnnex]

I asked you to prove your claim, that's all.

There's no conspiracy here, cosmored.

Is he talking about Obama's legacy yes or no?

[ChumpDumper]

please clarify

You

got

those

numbers

mixed

up

[ChumpDumper]

Is he talking about Obama's legacy yes or no?

You seem so unsure of yourself now after such a bld thread le.

[TheSanityAnnex]

You seem so unsure of yourself now after such a bld thread le.

Is he talking about Obama's legacy yes or no?

[pgardn]

He should have included the 8 years before that too.

So I guess we go back to G. Washington for good times?

[ChumpDumper]

Is he talking about Obama's legacy yes or no?

I can easily see how he could be talking about something else. I certainly wouldn't start a thread claiming that's the only thing he could possibly be talking about. I wouldn't be able to prove it and would look pretty stupid.

Wouldn't you agree?

[spurraider21]

You

got

those

numbers

mixed

up

i'm asking you to clarify. its ok if you can't. if i mixed 8 and 7 so be it. is he talking about the last 2 terms?

[TheSanityAnnex]

I can easily see how he could be talking about something else. I certainly wouldn't start a thread claiming that's the only thing he could possibly be talking about. I wouldn't be able to prove it and would look pretty stupid.

Wouldn't you agree?

You look pretty stupid now.

[ChumpDumper]

i'm asking you to clarify. its ok if you can't

I did.

Do you really need to be spoon fed your error?

What part of "You got those numbers mixed up" do you not understand?

There were two numbers.

There is only one correct sequence for the numbers.

You got the sequence wrong.

Do you understand?

Yes or no.

[ChumpDumper]

You look pretty stupid now.

You're the one who is salty about not being able to prove his claim.

[spurraider21]

I did.

Do you really need to be spoon fed your error?

What part of "You got those numbers mixed up" do you not understand?

There were two numbers.

There is only one correct sequence for the numbers.

You got the sequence wrong.

Do you understand?

Yes or no.

i'm asking you to clarify. its ok if you can't. if i mixed 8 and 7 so be it. is he talking about the last 2 terms?

lol

your dodge has been duly noted

[ChumpDumper]

lol

your dodge has been duly noted

lol your edit has been duly noted.

It's your error. So be it.

[spurraider21]

keep dodging. it's funny

[ChumpDumper]

keep dodging. it's funny

Dodging what?

You finally figured out your up.

Congratulations. It's funny.

[spurraider21]

Dodging what?

here i'll post it for a third time

i'm asking you to clarify. its ok if you can't. if i mixed 8 and 7 so be it. is he talking about the last 2 terms?

[TheSanityAnnex]

You're the one who is salty about not being able to prove his claim.

You seemed confident that he was not talking about Obama's legacy and I was sure you'd post something supporting to support your stance and you did not.

What 15 years of legacies was he referring to?

[ChumpDumper]

here i'll post it for a third time

I don't know specifically what he is talking about.

You guys are the one's who are so sure.

Or are you now?

[ChumpDumper]

You seemed confident that he was not talking about Obama's legacy and I was sure you'd post something supporting to support your stance and you did not.

I was sure you couldn't prove your claim and would get salty about it.

What 15 years of legacies was he referring to?

Dunno. I'm not going to jump to conclusions. Could be a lot of things tbh. My guess would be Republicans. That would make more sense than Obama, wouldn't you think?

I mean, it can't be ruled out as a possibility, can it? Not without more context.

[Spurminator]

I don't know if he's talking about Obama specifically or general Washington gridlock caused by a Republican-controlled Congress that has refused to work with him during his presidency. I do know that this is a 25 second video with a sensationalist headline posted by what is obviously a far-right YouTube channel, and since I've had internet access for more than two weeks, naturally my skepticism is high.

[TheSanityAnnex]

I was sure you couldn't prove your claim and would get salty about it.

Dunno. I'm not going to jump to conclusions. Could be a lot of things tbh. My guess would be Republicans. That would make more sense than Obama, wouldn't you think?

I mean, it can't be ruled out as a possibility, can it? Not without more context.

I've never heard people refer to congress legacies, so no, I'm still going with him referring to Obama and Bush.

[ChumpDumper]

I've never heard people refer to congress legacies, so no, I'm still going with him referring to Obama and Bush.

You've never heard of a political party's legacy?

CROFL

Damn, TSA -- of all the things to double down on -- you expect us to believe that you have never heard of a political party's legacy.

[baseline bum]

I don't know if he's talking about Obama specifically or general Washington gridlock caused by a Republican-controlled Congress that has refused to work with him during his presidency. I do know that this is a 25 second video with a sensationalist headline posted by what is obviously a far-right YouTube channel, and since I've had internet access for more than two weeks, naturally my skepticism is high.

It's still laughable hearing Clinton talk about regulation when he gutted it in his presidency. Clinton's pretty much the poster boy for what Chomsky calls our one party system.