Duncan playing for Pitino would have sucked. The thought of Duncan having to play with dumbass Antoine Walker is disturbing.
Imagine if the key Spurs don't get injured the whole year in 1996-97 (I'll be nice, they didn't tank), imagine if they go about 53-29 and stay good but never good enough, the twin towers never come together and Boston wins the lottery that season. Would it have been yet another Celtics dynasty? Or would the bright lights of Boston and the harsher sports climate there mess with Timmy's head? Or is Duncan great but hampered by poor management in Boston and does he go on to have a career as notable as Mitch Richmond?
Imagine the last 20 years...
Duncan playing for Pitino would have sucked. The thought of Duncan having to play with dumbass Antoine Walker is disturbing.
Duncan would've had more finals appearances not having to play the Shaq Lakers, 2006 Mavs, Pau Lakers, etc
That's assuming he had a good enough supporting cast around him.
Then again, who was good in the east from about 1999-2007? The Pacers off and on, the Pistons for a few overrated years (they won a le because the Lakers imploded in the Finals), the Heat with Shaq (who also needed a break or two) and ..? And the Nets don't count, they were just the best of a bad bunch, they may not have made the playoffs as a Western Conference team some of those years.
Exactly. The league would've wanted a lakers Celtics rivalry as well, I'm sure Tim would've gotten some help if not through the draft/FA, through a lopsided trade.
Duncan and Paul Pierce would have been enough to win multiple championships sooner or later.
That's assuming Pierce is still drafted in 1998 by the C's. If they get Duncan, they may have instantly become a power and never been in position to add another star in the draft.
Duncan would have taken the Celtics into the playoffs and they wouldn't have been able to draft Pierce.
Good points scros. Still, Duncan is just too god like to have never rang. On a big market like Boston he would have gotten, sooner or later, the help everyone needs to ring.
Last edited by DAF86; 05-03-2016 at 10:08 PM.
Imagine if he ended up in Vancouver. They had the worst record that year but got ed over because they were an expansion team.
Yeah, they would have definitely won a le or two with Duncan. Well, unless they lost him to Orlando. I'd imagine Pitino and Antoine Walker wouldn't be nearly as good at selling Duncan on staying as Pop and DRob were.![]()
The team with the worst record rarely wins the #1 pick iirc
Well, yeah, it's not like they were guaranteed to win anyway. But they were literally not allowed to win the #1 pick for their first few years of existence under NBA rules. At least the Celtics had a chance and just got unlucky![]()
Wow, I never knew that lol that's ed up
San Antonio was the best thing that could have happened to Duncan. He needed a low key place to grow and thrive in. When he was drafted, San Antonio was much like Oklahoma City or Jacksonville in stature. Given his personality, I could see him wilting under the pressure because of those a-hole fans and media (not all) in Boston. And I don't mean Wilting with a capital dub though he could have gone on a Wilt Chamberlain run also.
That was an agreement between the Raptors and Grizzlies, so it was mutual as they came into the league. It helps stop situations like the Bucks getting Lew Abdul-Jabbar and cashing in with a le in less than 5 seasons. Stupid though, both needed all the help they could get, especially the Raptors who didn't win 50 games in a season until just now.
That's re ed, but typical ignorant Rocket fan logic.
Duncan "wilting under pressure"
That has to be among the most reterded takes I have ever read.![]()
Which part?
Anyways, yes, I think it takes a certain type of personality to play in Boston. Not good, not bad, not strong, not weak but Boston is a tough sports market where many fans are drunk a-holes who, along with the media, scrutinize everything. San Antonio is as laid back as can be and has historically just been happy to just have a pro sports team until the Spurs started regularly winning it all. It was important, especially as a young player, not to have all that pressure and background noise. Boston and Philly are the worst while NYC can be as bad because the spotlight is on you so much. LA can be like that, especially for the Lakers but not nearly as bad.
He would be like 5-3 or 4-3 in the Finals.
Poopovich would be selling Wine in Ukraine
Spurs had the 3rd worst record that year, so by logic, with the same ping pong balls in the lottery, and assuming the teams just move up one spot, the Nuggets would get that pick.
LoL, how are the Pistons overrated when they almost beat the Spurs in the 2005 Finals WITHOUT homecourt & w/ an inferior bench than the 2004 squad.
If it wasn't for Horry having an out of body 4th quarter/OT in Gm 5 & Sheed didn't have a brain fart the Pistons could have repeated. (The 2008-10 Lakers were inferior than those Pistons)
The whole point of the thread was what if TD went to Boston, not what would have happened if the Spurs were good. That said, Denver would have been interesting because it would have kept him out west.
Last edited by Caltex2; 05-04-2016 at 03:11 PM.
It doesn't change the fact they took advantage of a Lakers implosion. It was part of the reason Shaq left in the offseason, he was furious that Kobe wouldn't pass him the ball. It's funny, they should have beaten the Spurs but lost to the Lakers.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)