Reply With Quote
We won as a team, Bonner helped us with the Thunder to get 5. Team chemistry goes beyond playing time.yeah, we won those five because of matt bonner's great play in the playoffs
yeah, we won those five because of matt bonner's great play in the playoffs
We won as a team, Bonner helped us with the Thunder to get 5. Team chemistry goes beyond playing time.yeah, we won those five because of matt bonner's great play in the playoffs
that's why patty should start over parker.
so... what is it you think parker does so much better than mills?
Fits better with the 1st unit. Same goes for Patty with the second unit.
gambit continually gets lambasted for this awful trade idea and continues to try defending himself. Now he says he's okay with "win now" mode which means trading one of two guys on your team that can defend wings (Green) for a redundant part THIS YEAR in Whiteside (may be different if Duncan retires, but you could lose Whiteside for nothing anyway).
Full of contradictions.
Lmao... Trade Parker for a pass first pg...But also let's starts no pass patty mills
Lmao..why won't you admit Whiteside is a real boss (proceeds to ignore how boss Duncan and lma are)
Lmao Danny green for Gerald green
Lmao rental for Whiteside,, paying for tosb dragic
Lmao Slovenian pg
Whiteside getting schooled in garbage time by friggen Boban. Also he's never seen a shot he hasn't wanted to swat out of bounds and give the shooting team a mulligan.
Empty stats guy who is about to get maxed.
Last edited by cjw; 03-23-2016 at 10:07 PM.
Dude's self-taught.
But yeah, it was a bad proposal in almost every facet.
Wow, too mesmerized by him. Time to fix that.Dude's self-taught.
????????
-how stupid can you be? i said from the start that the point of my trade proposal was to win now
-yeah, i would've sacrificed green in part to get whiteside... we would've still had butler to defend wings. how does having whiteside make him redundant on this team??? according to you he'd be redundant because we have someone who's turning 40 next month
-you said i'm full of contradictions... look up that word in the dictionary before you use it you stupid .
you two are so right, whiteside wouldn't be exactly what we need on the defensive side. we have diaw and west and boban to block all those dunks okc attempted against us!
Wow, putting all that weight on a game without five of your key players including your best two bigs. If you answer this adequately, I'll shut up but if you're in win now mode, why do you give up one of the best 3 and D players in the league that you NEED to beat the only team ahead of you in the standings (Green) for a redundant player in Whiteside (Aldridge is way better, and Duncan is still a better defender - defense isn't all about swatting the ball out of bounds). He's also unplayable against GS smallball lineups if you want to use Aldridge.-how stupid can you be? i said from the start that the point of my trade proposal was to win now
-yeah, i would've sacrificed green in part to get whiteside... we would've still had butler to defend wings. how does having whiteside make him redundant on this team??? according to you he'd be redundant because we have someone who's turning 40 next month
-you said i'm full of contradictions... look up that word in the dictionary before you use it you stupid .
you two are so right, whiteside wouldn't be exactly what we need on the defensive side. we have diaw and west and boban to block all those dunks okc attempted against us!
Whiteside is redundant with Duncan this year, and is an UFA this offseason. Danny Green for a rental ... lol
Seriously, just go back to your phantom world of 2K trades and spare us the drivel.
right, cause bringing diaw + west never limits our front courtwhiteside wouldn't have helped grab some rebounds last night?how does having whiteside make him redundant on this team??? according to you he'd be redundant because we have someone who's turning 40 next month
^^No, because he's injured and will be limited if he even returns at any point in the playoffs
Joe Johnson has been a ing embarrassment in the playoffs, btw
Should have looked to move Diaw/Mills back then, tbh..
Gambit has to be the dumbest poster this side of Fuzz. Worst bumps ever.
if whiteside was traded to us and injured atm, we'd still have mcroberts. taller, younger, more athletic than diaw and west. led all big men in assists a season or two ago. fantastic court vision and passing ability:^^No, because he's injured and will be limited if he even returns at any point in the playoffs
and dragic would've been an upgrade.
whiteside, dragic, mcroberts > parker, green
everyone on this board agrees we need a pg for next season. with my trade proposal, that wouldn't be a concern.
No way Miami does that trade...
i do not argue it was a very implausible trade. what's SO funny is that posters here on the proposal even if it was totally plausible.
obviously you recognize we would get back more than what we would be giving away
Agreed I would do that trade in a heartbeat but Miami would be dumb to accept such a lopsided deal...i do not argue it was a very implausible trade. what's SO funny is that posters here on the proposal even if it was totally plausible.
obviously you recognize we would get back more than what we would be giving away
post more tbh.
it is a very lopsided deal. some posters here think it would've been a terrible trade for us
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions