That twink could have dropped trou, taken a deuce in a gatorade cup, dumped it on LeBron's dome, and not be suspended for G7.
League is primed for the finale in Oakland, twink bros will get every single call.
I'm saying intent doesn't matter. It could be a gun or a nerf ball. Just because Curry "didn't mean to" doesn't magically change the results of his actions. A fan was hit.
That twink could have dropped trou, taken a deuce in a gatorade cup, dumped it on LeBron's dome, and not be suspended for G7.
League is primed for the finale in Oakland, twink bros will get every single call.
There's a 0% chance that fan isn't getting something IMO![]()
I would have gotten pissed off and started talking to Curry and thrown it right back at him.
Should have seen what Jason Day's wife did - she sold that better than Mr. Perfect
Perhaps in an alternate Mandela universe the fan was murdered by the mouthpiece.
If I accidentally hit someone with a nerf ball I'm not going to jail![]()
Mandela is about other dimensions, not universes. Tesla counted up to 24 dimensions during his lifetime.
Fan missed out on some cash imo. I would have milked that .
The Berenstein has me freaked out. I'm trying to track down my old books to double check. Of course I go through phases of smoking too much so my memory isn't perfect, but it's still weird.
yeah, but Lebron wasn't throwing a tantrum, he was going for a loose ball. Huge difference.
I remember back in the day when my grannys neighbor called the cops because we accidently hit her with a football.![]()
Incorrect. Players have gotten suspended multiple games for firing objects into the crowd in the past. Granted most of those were RS and certainly none in the Finals, but there is a precedent for it. Twink should absolutely be suspended.
It's called a ing soccer ball in this country
Yes, but whether or not you intended to hit the person or not doesn't change the outcome of your actions. That's my point.
Curry shouldn't be granted absolution in this case because "I didn't mean to do it!" I would think the NBA would look down on players throwing tantrums to the point where they're indiscriminately hurling germ infested mouthpieces toward their paying customers.
I agree, though, that since no precedent was set (has a player ever been suspended for throwing something into the crowd?), Curry will get off scot free.
Yeah I freaked out a bit, then realized how little we know about how the Universe works, and that God has everything well in hand.![]()
You're really reaching here. Draymond's suspension was 100% warranted but Curry doesn't deserve one.
No. Not for the mouth piece. Everyone I can think of has gone by the same set of rules:
Aimed at/hit ref = suspension
Aimed at/hit fan = fine
That fan is wealthy as , doesn't need gifts.
That fan was a little ; should've been a fist.
Jalen Rose says he bets Curry gets suspended, but I don't know if he knows more than we do.
Would be funny if that actually happened.
Who is "Wardell"?
Is spitting on someone illegal?
A:
Quick Answer
In the United States, Intentionally spitting on someone is illegal. While it may not cause physical damage, it meets the requirement threshold for the definition of Battery.
https://www.reference.com/government...60134c13ccc698
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)