Reply With Quote
There would be a market for Parker but he's not being shopped. A difference in cause/effect.
Isn't that what I said?
And even if they were, he's got no positive value. People need to stop trying to pawn him off for a first rounder.
There would be a market for Parker but he's not being shopped. A difference in cause/effect.
What on earth are you getting for Parker?
I'm not one of the Parker truthers out there who thinks he should be cut. He's fine, but you wouldn't get value for him. It would cost you to move him right now for no salary in return because of how valuable cap space is.
Not really.. He can still run the offense and get guys involved. Getting another big guy and more shooters would be ideal
yeah, he gets guys involved when he has no option but to pass with a few seconds left on the shot clock.
Teams like the Bulls and Hawks are going the correct route by blowing up, tbh..Bulls desperately needed to move on from Rose, he's a cancer and an atrocious player..
Hawks just desperately need to shake things up, they are the perfect example of a mid-tier team going nowhere..
Sure, if that's what you want to believe lol
Bud and the like are no fools. They know they need to do something to capitalize on the strengths that they have.
^^Hopefully..I thought they were going to blow it up at the deadline, this past season, yet they decided not to..
Holding on to Horford is the wrong move, though IMO..
Probably felt they owed it to give it a go during the playoffs and see if they could catch lightning in a bottle. They absolutely need to blow the whole thing up. Shroeder and Bazemore are the only pieces I'd keep plus whatever young rookies the have.
the ball moves better without parker. check your signature.
Ah, well that sample size is small. You did see the 2014 finals right? He was involved in plenty of that action
ANALYTICS ART: DERRICK ROSE BOUNCING BACK TO FORM DESPITE BULLS MELTDOWN
pts/48 a/48 r/48 TO/48 FG% 3P% FTA/48 Post all star break 31.0 7.9 5.4 4.4 .524 .483 4.4 MVP Year 32.1 9.9 5.2 4.4 .445 .332 8.8
Still pretty are Gasol will end up in SA.
Woj just said there wasn't any market for Rose, at all
Doesn't sound good for Parker, a superior player to Rose but much older, of course..
I would take Spencer or lamb for the 22nd.
Brooklyn should get on both of these trades. Imagine two picks in the early post-lottery.
Charlotte offering 22nd pick for contracts of Lamb (3 yr/ 21 mil) or Hawes (2 yr/ 12.3 mil), yet you think Suns AT MOST "might" give up the 28th for 33 yr old Chandler w/ 3 yr 39 million remaining.
Looks like you were wrong, again.
I'd take Lamb for the 22nd.. That guy has been on teams that don't know how to maximize talent.
Charlotte WANTS to move Lamb or Hawes. Phoenix hasn't said anything about moving Chandler. You can't leverage extra value out of someone who doesn't want to deal in the first place.
This constant PMSing is really sad, dude. It's just wall-to-wall butt-hurt from you, 24/7 nowadays.
Would you take on Lamb for 22?
Spurs don't need anymore marginal or meh wings. They have those with Anderson/Simmons. No need to clog up that position w/ redundancies.
Not before seeing what Durant wants to do.
They value shedding the "dead" salary to create room to use that salary to sign a better player(s).
There's no reason for PHX to hold on to 33 yr old under-performing Tyson Chandler. They'd be able to utilize that 39 million in better ways that correlate with their current situation.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions