Reply With Quote
yeah I'm dodging you going over there and looking for yourself. What I note is you didn't review all I said with this latest diatribe. Frankly wgaf?
Fox News Vice President to Hannity: Stop using bull polls claiming Trump won debate
Sean Hannity has reportedly been reprimanded by Fox News for using inaccurate online polls to try to prove that Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton in Monday night’s debate.
Hours after the debate, Hannity said “I’ll give you the list of polls. Time Magazine, Drudge report, CNBC, The Hill, CBS. The only one that has Hillary winning is CNN and they’re the Clinton News Network anyway.”
Hannity claimed that “hundreds of thousands if not millions” of participants chose Trump as the victor in various online polls. However, professional pollsters say that the number of respondents is not nearly as important as whether the respondents reflect the population that the poll is claiming to represent.
Fox News hosts Steve Doocy and Martha MacCallum also misrepresented the polls on their programs. Doocy said “I think a majority of the online polls show, according to the stuff we saw this morning, they show that he’s leading,” later adding as an afterthought that “It’s not scientific.”
MacCallum didn’t identify her sources as online polls at all, saying only that “A lot of polls show him winning last night,” she said. “Fascinating, right? It’s fascinating.”
A memo from Fox News vice president of public-opinion research Dana Blanton has since been acquired by Business Insider, in which the VP tells the hosts to stop citing these misleading polls.
“As most of the publications themselves clearly state, the sample obviously can’t be representative of the electorate because they only reflect the views of those Internet users who have chosen to participate,” Blanton wrote.
http://usuncut.com/news/fox-news-vic...mp-won-debate/
Would Ailes have sent that memo?
yeah I'm dodging you going over there and looking for yourself. What I note is you didn't review all I said with this latest diatribe. Frankly wgaf?
if you're going to accuse me of "outing" myself as one of potentially several posters on a forum i've never been to, you should at least be able to narrow down the several posters and identify a few for me.
NATIONAL POLL: Clinton gets a post-debate bump
Business Insider
Duration 0:01:06
But Trump is leading among independents
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/video/...153057507.html
No, I don't. Get over it. I still never used moral equivalency.
dodge duly noted
Poll: After Debate, Women Think Less of Trump and Better of Clinton
Twenty-seven percent of likely women voters said the debate made them think worse of Trump.
Meanwhile, nearly a third, or 30 percent, said their opinion of Clinton had improved, compared to 22 percent of men.
Women were also far likelier to say Clinton won the debate, by a 10-point margin over men.
"I'm undecided, but I'm leaning more towards Hillary than I ever have before because of the debate," said Joan Hume, a 71-year-old retiree in Fairfield, Ohio who said she voted for Trump in the Republican primary because she wanted to "see Washington shaken up."
Hume added, "There's a side of him that's scary to me that I'm seeing more of. I thought maybe he would change when he got the nomination, but he's getting worse."
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/...sm_fb_lastword
How could any woman, if she GAS about women, vote for Trash, because of Trash?
No doubt women could vote for Trash but only as a vote against Hillary.
Isn't that the crux of this election? How many are voting against Trump vs. how many are voting against Hillary?
I've read up to 30% on each side, but the way Trash is crashing, 30% voting against Trash could go up.
oh...either way then. At least it'll be smack in the middle of both the NBA and NFL season.
Not going to spoon feed you. Google is that way----------------------->
Look it up.
My definition of politician includes dodging questions.
Trump Stumbles All Over Himself When Asked a Single Foreign Policy Question by O’Reilly
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/trump-stu...on-by-oreilly/
4 Questions Voters Need Donald Trump To Stop Dodging
http://thefederalist.com/2016/02/25/...-stop-dodging/
Donald Trump’s secret for avoiding hard questions
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poste...=.84781db963df
Trump Still Won't Answer Key Question About His Business Ties With Russia
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewir...ussia-business
Media Call Out Trump For Dodging Key Science Questions
[url]http://mediamatters.org/research/2016/09/13/media-call-out-trump-dodging-key-science-question
I know where Google is you twit, and the answer is "effectively NO." Yes he was considered the "Reform Party" candidate for 5 months beginning in October 1999, but that hardly qualifies in my opinion.
Whatever the "the Reform Party" is...
short lived nationalist/nativist movement started by Pat Buchanan leading up to 1996. Bears more than a passing resemblance to what Trump is doing now, minus the positive emphasis on Russia.
literally dabom
http://www.theonion.com/article/open...ebate-de-54026
...having reportedly considered roughly two minutes’ worth of statements made by each presidential nominee before declaring that Clinton had turned in a “dominant performance"
lol trump melting down on twitter early this morning
Trump being tore apart by the very people he s on constantly. Muslims and hispanics.
3 minutes though.
For him to have the mass number of loyal followers that he has is embarrassing for our country to say the least. Hillary has her faults yes, but at least she can fake it.
the cnn is very leaning to the liberals and they admit it
So Trump didn't run for president in 2012?
Yes or no, would do.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
