SO ARE YOU GOING TO WRITE IN SANDERS THE TRAITOR
[QUOTE=baseline bum;8746761]The Democrats can't take the house with all the gerrymandering done since 2010, that's ridiculous.[/QU
I mostly agree, wth the Repug/VRWC "redmap" strategy after the 2010 census and VRWC SCOTUS gutting the VRA, but we'll see.
The VRWC's Repug/tea bagger caucus in the House is tough, but not unbeatable, just highly unlikely the Repugs can lose enough House seats to hand the gavel back to Pelosi.
In any case, America is ed and un able.
SO ARE YOU GOING TO WRITE IN SANDERS THE TRAITOR
I see you have me in the crushing grip of reason.
I guess you and ducks are what conservatives get for stigmatizing education.
Your posts constantly point to a lack of critical thinking skills that have made me wonder what it is about conservative "values" that attract people who just can't think for themselves.
We can't.
But this election is going to be a death rattle for the GOP.
Another four years will be another four years of maturing hispanic voters.
I've noticed that. They keep trying to spin like the other stuff he said doesn't exist.
A 12-14 point Clinton win would make it possible, but yeah the gerrymandering is ridiculous. In 2012 Dems won 1.4m more votes and still had a 33 seat deficit. Criminal
Well, let's start posting quotes then. Suitable tomb grafitti, IMO.
Here’s audio of Trump bragging about walking in on naked beauty pageant contestants
http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/3060...-howard-stern/
Chance of winning
Hillary Clinton 83.4%
Donald Trump 16.6%
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/...tion-forecast/
I don't think it is. The GOP has been an incredibly successful party at the state level, which makes them a very successful party for the house. They're pretty ed in the presidency but will still be controlling a huge proportion of the governments in this nation even if the Dems take the presidency and senate (and the senate is just a little better than a coin-flip for them).
lol you actually believe we are on the verge of being a single party country.
I know you will enjoy the Rah-Rah Go Team Clinton for awhile but the wrecking ball is coming to a political party near you. Hillary's victory will guarantee it...believe me.
for real. Why do these idiots want a 1 party political system?
dumbasses cant see that that basicalky a monarchy
![]()
No, actually, I don't.
I would vastly prefer that Republicans would start embracing moderates I could support again.
Truth.
Believe you? No offense, but I think I will pass until you can demonstrate some modi of critical thinking beyond door-bell ringing partisanship. "but here is why Democrats are bad, it's new from my preferred media outlet that I agree with" doesn't really inspire much confidence in your ability to process information accurately.
The GOP will wander in the wilderness, and hopefully figure out how to find their asses with both hands.
You're right.
We should be talking about the potential direct conflicts of interest in his finances:
Or maybe we should be talking about a "tremendous" businessman who ing doesn't know what a blind trust is after having been running for president for almost a full year. What a ing Biznis geenyus.If Clinton Needs to Close Her Foundation, Trump Needs to Dissolve His Company
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer...-interest.html
Trump plan to avoid business conflicts of interest doesn't fly
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer...-interest.html
It isn't just about the mean words is it?
Hillary Clinton, citing 'Trump Effect,' says teachers are reporting more bullying in schools
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...ays-teachers-/
"Parents and teachers are already worrying about what they call the ‘Trump Effect.’ They report that bullying and harassment are on the rise in our schools, especially targeting students of color, Muslims and immigrants."
Maybe irresponsible, hateful rhetoric is harmful? What do you think?
LOL attributing more bullying in school to Trump.What will you come up with next?
Trash has "mainstreamed", out of the implicit shadows, emboldened not only school bullies, but very probably workplace bullies, and then bigots, racists, xenophobes, liars, misogynists, white nationalists, sexual predators, just assholery in general.
Thanks, establishment Repugs. Trash's supporters are 150% what you've been courting for 50 years. YOU OWN TRASH.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 10-11-2016 at 03:43 PM.
This is horse . For someone who constantly rants about logical fallacies, you can't sincerely believe that there is any meaningful evidence drawing this link. Even the article you posted admits that the claim is not scientific.
Your sensationalism is the same tactic Trump uses. How's that for irony?The center conducted an online survey of approximately 2,000 K-12 teachers and found: "Teachers have noted an increase in bullying, harassment and intimidation of students whose races, religions or nationalities have been the verbal targets of candidates on the campaign trail."
While their findings correspond directly with Clinton’s claim, it’s important to note that this was not a scientific survey, as the report notes. The respondents don’t represent a random sample of teachers, and it’s likely that those who chose to respond to the survey are those who are most concerned about the campaign’s impact on students.
Forgot to add this part:
This means it would be inaccurate to extrapolate from the survey that bullying and harassment are generally on the rise across the country. Rather, it is more a collection of teachers’ anecdotal experiences.
We looked for a scientific study that speaks to this same question but couldn’t find one, mostly because there tends to be a lag in this kind of data, meaning data on bullying trends in 2016 won’t get published until 2017 or later. The process of setting up and getting approval to conduct a scientific study is lengthy and bersome, and would not be approved before the election, said Sheri Bauman, a professor at the University of Arizona who researches bullying.
Following the Hoover Administration the dems controlled congress and the presidency for decades. GOP types still haven't departed from Hoover/Coolidge ideology and people are starting to recall history now that its repeating itself.
Once you lose CU, you will see the Koch/ALEC stranglehold on state assemblies evaporate and the rollback of the massive gerrymandering which is already seeing pushback. The success of Sanders amongst millennials is just writing on the wall while the Boomers who gave us Clinton are marching to the grave.
You can wishcast your preferred outcome but the above are the mechanics that I see.
And I would vastly prefer that Democrats would start embracing liberals I could support again. And not neocons like Shallary and Obomber
"Koch/ALEC stranglehold on state assemblies evaporate and the rollback of the massive gerrymandering"
WTF? precisely how does that happen?
This is dumb as .
You left out the part where he bilked investors and contractors by claiming bankruptcy but not before he used the losses on his personal return as a carryover. You left out the part where he used his charities to pay off state AGs who were investigating his school. You left out the part where he described how and why he committed sexual assault. You left out the part where he is accused of child rape in federal court with 3 witnesses who have come forward.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)