Reply With Quote
Hillary Repeatedly Answers 'Do Not Recall' in Email Lawsuit Testimony
how does she rember what trump says?
WHY NOW WHY NOW
oh look the Clintons put money into their accounts!
Hillary Repeatedly Answers 'Do Not Recall' in Email Lawsuit Testimony
how does she rember what trump says?
Secretary Clinton states that she does not recall being advised, cautioned, or warned, she does not recall that it was ever suggested to her, and she does not recall participating in any communication, conversation, or meeting in which it was discussed that her use of a clintonemail.com e-mail account to conduct official State Department business conflicted with or violated federal recordkeeping laws," Clinton's lawyers wrote.
She signed the filing on Monday "under penalty of perjury."
the current president will pardon her because he does not believe in the usa laws should apply to the Clintons!
Mic e Obama Says She's Never Heard Anything Like Trump?
And if you're asking: No, she hasn't had a comment on her husband parading around an airplane 2007 with an erection in front of a bunch of impressed female infobabes. She hasn't commented on that.
And then she said... You know what else she said? She said, "We need to elect Hillary Clinton because we need somebody to heal the wounds that divide us." Well, now, wait just a minute. Wounds that divide us? Why are there divisions in Barack Obama's America? Why are there wounds in Barack Obama's America? Why is there any healing necessary in Barack Obama's America? Whatever happened to hope and change? Whatever happened to postracial? Whatever happened to postpartisan? Whatever happened to all this?
So you mean we have racial wounds?
We have wounds, we need healing, and apparently Obama's not up to the job?
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/20...ing_like_trump
RUSH: Mic e Obama says she doesn't know men that talk like Donald Trump. She's forgotten Reverend Wright talking about Bill Clinton and Monica. Reverend Wright, from the pulpit of the Obamas' church, "Yeah, Bill was riding dirty! His chickens have come home to roost!" She never heard talk like that, I guess, at church.
RUSH: Yeah, I guess Mic e Obama wasn't there when the Reverend Wright was talking about Bill Clinton. You remember what Reverend Wright said about Bill Clinton, Monica Lewinsky? (interrupting) No. That's not what he said. (impression) "And Bill and Monica Lewinsky was riding dirty. Yeah, chickens have come home to roost, baby." "Bill was riding dirty," and the population, the congregation went nuts.
I would love for Trump to make the mistake of going after Mic e. That would be an epic failure.
Curt Schilling Ties Himself In Knots Defending Donald Trump's Lust For A Young Girl
he was there to defend the reputation of Donald Trump, who once bragged about sexually assaulting women and stands accused of doing just that.
Along with those accusations came a 1992 video in which Donald Trump looks at a pre-teen girl and says, “I’m gonna be dating her in 10 years. Can you believe it?” Schilling wanted to defend that statement in particular, and things did not go well:
Schilling starts out by proclaiming that it’s totally normal for adults to remark on the physical appearance of their friends’ kids—which is much different than “I’m gonna be dating her in 10 years,”
but I digress—and stumbles a bit when the host tells him that not everyone would consider such behavior normal.
Then Schilling says, “I have a daughter, my daughter has friends. I’ve seen my daughter’s friends, I’m a man—wow she’s a beautiful young lady. I don’t immediately jump to molesting her.”
Curt Schilling is a carnival attraction, and
he has nothing of interest to say about anything,
but let this clip serve as proof of just how much one has to debase themselves at this point in order to remain in the tank for Donald Trump.
http://deadspin.com/curt-schilling-t...d-t-1787764072
Trump Reportedly Referred to Deaf Apprentice Contestant as Re ed
http://www.mediaite.com/online/trump...t-as-re ed/
Donald Trump has gone nuts: In speech meant to defend sex assault allegations, he goes full Breitbart
Donald Trump's first public comments following a rash of sexual assault allegations went beyond ugly into madness
The Republican presidential nominee espoused a fringe conspiracy theory about “international banks” conspiring to undermine U.S. sovereignty.
He called former president Bill Clinton and Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton “criminals” who have orchestrated a massive cover-up of their alleged crimes, and
he lashed out at the women who came forward to accuse him of assault,
suggesting that one of them wasn’t attractive enough to merit his sexual advances.
Trump opened up his remarks by claiming that a global cabal of shadowy “special interests” had looted the American economy and destroyed local manufacturing. “The Clinton machine is at the center of this power structure,”
Setting up the Clintons as the leaders of a vast global conspiracy was the transition Trump needed to defend himself against the rash of sexual assault allegations he’s now facing.
First, he called the Clintons the true lawbreakers. “The Clintons are criminals. Remember that. They’re criminals,” Trump said. “This is well-do ented, and the establishment that protects them has engaged in a massive cover-up of widespread criminal activity.”
Then he turned his attention to the women he allegedly sexually assaulted. “Another ridiculous tale, no witnesses, no nothing,” Trump said, referring to The New York Times report that he groped a woman on an airplane in the 1980s. “These events never, ever happened,” Trump added, “and the people that said them, meekly, fully understand. Take a look at these people. Study these people, and you’ll understand also.”
When it came to the People magazine reporter who alleged in a wrenching accountthat Trump forced himself on her during an interview, Trump dismissed her claim and then pretty much called her too ugly to assault.
As Trump put it: “Look at her. Look at her words. You tell me what you think. I don’t think so.”
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/13/dona...ull-breitbart/
The Hate Comes Home To Roost
There's a new conspiracy theory rapidly gaining traction among Trump supporters about the origin of the 'Access Hollywood' Trump tape which triggered days of new allegations about Donald Trump's alleged history of sexual abuse.
The claim is that Dan Senor, a prominent GOP political operative, who is Jewish and married to former television reporter Campbell Brown, is behind the tape disclosure and part of a plot of "GOP elites" to destroy Donald Trump.
In other words, in this conspiracy theory, Senor is now cast as the Jewish "traitor" working for the conspiracy of political elites, international financiers and the media who Trumped railed against today in his speech.
it's not just that Trump and his campaign are bringing marginalized extremists into mainstream politics. He's radicalizing new people.
The Senor/Access Hollywood conspiracy theory seems to be rapidly morphing into a vehicle for these at udes and beliefs.
Trump's animosity against 'Republican elites' and the new charges about global financiers are getting wrapped together with explicit anti-Semitism even if Trump hasn't made the connections himself.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/the-hate-comes-home-to-roost?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_ca mpaign=Feed%3A+tpm-news+%28TPMNews%29
Why is that person calling Megyn Kelly a liberal?
She may be hot but she's as crazy and ultra conservative as the rest of the people at Fox.
Jack Abramoff Goes Off On Hillary: ‘Most Corrupt Person In History Of United States To Get This Close To The Presidency’
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/13/ja...#ixzz4N1MrHURt
She did not rule out going to CNN after contract out
She also is for clinton
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/...user-s-house-2
In the Abuser's House #2
Once again we have a day that knocks into pieces everything we think is within the realm of the possibly normal or conceivable in our politics. Republicans half cut Trump loose over the weekend, only to see a rapid and brutal backlash from Trump's supporters who make up the bulk of the base of the Republican party. That they didn't anticipate this is a measure of how much, at this late date, they still don't quite grasp the nature of the person they are dealing with or the moment they are operating in. By Monday, the few Republicans who had explicitly jumped ship were starting to jump back on the ship. Now over the course of a single evening we have as many as a dozen new accusers - women from various walks of life, different parts of the country, different historical eras. By any remotely reasonable political, moral logic, Trump's whole party would now desert him en masse. But it's less than four weeks before the election. And the process of endorsing, de-endorsing, re-endorsing and more has become too much of a dark comedy to go through yet again. As I noted earlier this week, Trump is now at war with Hillary, the media and the GOP. But the GOP is the only one of those three he's in a position to hurt. And bullies prey on the weak.
It is difficult to keep track of, to comprehend the totality of what's going on. And by that I mean not simply Trump's being revealed as a serial predator on what's looking like the scale, if not the MO, of a Bill Cosby. We know many such men exist. But it's also the man who's spent a year and a half demonizing and targeting various ethnic and racial groups, mainstreaming white supremacists and anti-Semitism. He's also threatened to upend core geopolitical ties around the world, been revealed as a serial con artist, from high-flying cons involving hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars to the most penny ante seminar schemes targeting the desperate and vulnerable.
All of it of course comes back to a simple reality. This is the consequence of a major political party tethering itself and its fate to a deeply damaged psyche. Not just the entire party but the entire country is forced into the chaos and drama that might only exist in such a person's head and for his family members and work associates. People with severe personality disorders create drama and chaos around them. They create more when placed under stress. This is one of the most basic and enduring facts of human experience. We've seen it play out with Trump. As we've discussed in recent weeks, everyone who crosses into Trump's orbit, into his gravitational pull, gets damaged. No one gets out unhurt. What stands out about all these cases - the Christies, Giulianis, Priebuses - is that the damage is almost always self-inflicted. They give way to it willingly. They surrender their dignity and selves through an alchemy which is all but inscrutable. But the damage is always part of the time with Trump.
Think of Paul Ryan, Chris Christie, Reince Priebus, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Paul Manafort. I could list dozens of others. It is impossible to think of any of these men and not see their stature reduced, their dignity in tatters and in some cases quite possibly their careers over. And these are the people who've tried to enlist with Trump or manage in his presence. It doesn't get to the men and women he's victimized. Of course, the ultimate victim is the Republican party and on a larger canvas the country itself. As I wrote Sunday night in reaction to the debate, one of the greatest damages is that we've all come to see Trump's chaotic emotions, violence and tirades as perhaps half normal. I had a hard time divining whether his angry bluster and transgressive antics in the debate would have any effect because we've all become so used to it. Like family members living in the home of an abuser our sense of what is normal starts to get blunted and deformed under the weight of abuse. The whole country is damaged in a way that won't soon lift under the best of cir stances.
Dale wants
Jack Abramoff, the Republican lobyist who was sentenced to six years in federal prison for mail fraud, conspiracy to bribe public officials, and tax evasion? That guy?
He was never going to win VA, far to diverse and has rapidly trended Democrat since 2004 (when Bush won it) 3 of last 4 Governors and both senators are Democrats with the last Repug being brought up on bribery charges.Trash yields VA. Now running only a 4-state campaign, with comparatively absent staff campared to Hillary's army.
"rigged!"
I see Virginia staying blue for a long time in Presidential elections, the Asian American population has exploded and they tend to vote Democrat along with a large black population.
Jerry Falwell Jr.: Trump has email evidence proving accusers are lying
http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/13/politi...ers/index.html
And West Virginia GOP gubernatorial candidate Bill Cole says he won't excuse what Trump says, but, "You have one candidate who wants to be there for our coal and our natural gas industry, and another one that wants to destroy them."
Clinton answers written questions under penalty of perjury in email lawsuit
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/1...#ixzz4N1tspJgJ
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
20 more times how should I know do not know
Bull . And you will NEVER see his tax returns unless someone leaks them.
Cut Ties to Donald Trump, Big Donors Urge R.N.C.
Several of the Republican Party’s most generous donors called on the Republican National Committee on Thursday to disavowDonald J. Trump, saying that allegations by multiple women that Mr. Trump had groped or made inappropriate sexual advances toward them threatened to inflict lasting damage on the party’s image.
To an elite group of Republican contributors who have donated millions of dollars to the party’s candidates and committees in recent years, the cascade of revelations related to Mr. Trump’s sexual conduct is grounds for the committee to cut ties with the party’s beleaguered standard-bearer, finally and fully.
“At some point, you have to look in the mirror and recognize that you cannot possibly justify support for Trump to your children — especially your daughters,” said David Humphreys, a Missouri business executive who contributed more than $2.5 million to Republicans from the 2012 campaign cycle through this spring.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/14/us...gn=pubexchange
"you have to look in the mirror"... such self-awareness, cir spection? for Trash's white men?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
