Reply With Quote
Bro, how can I be moving the goalpost when I quoted one of my own quotes that same day saying there needs to be do ents about Hillary doing illegal things or certainly doing something wrong. So where is that?
Top 3 welsh moment on ST, tbh...surpassed only by dallaskd and Koolaid Man
Bro, how can I be moving the goalpost when I quoted one of my own quotes that same day saying there needs to be do ents about Hillary doing illegal things or certainly doing something wrong. So where is that?
Are you referring to this quote?
"Directly on" =|= "directly from"
"Do ents about" =|= "do ents from"
What a welsher . . .
That would be the one.
Point out a batch of emails where they focus on herself.
So far you've mentioned the portion of the leaked speeches which weren't even transcripts. It was some guy picking and choosing passages and telling it as second hand to Podesta.
Then you have these emails that were hacked from John Podesta that only contain boring talking points.
I want to see actual do ents of Hillary doing it in the thick.
But hey, according to you, some 4chan users have recovered the missing 33k emails so surely, if so those will contain direct infomation from Hillary and I will be gone. ?
you are so ing re ed
the email chain doesn't start at the top you idiot. That is Hillary responding to Podesta's comment below.
He quotes where the source used is specifically excluded and you have a legion of mouthbreathers calling welch.
The collective intelligence of this board's conservatives is pretty ing sad.
Nothing is excluded wit. Reck just confirmed his own quote.
I confirmed my own quote with the terms, not the source.
Let me ask you this...how did wikileaks get this information? Was it lifted from John Podesta or Hillary?
You keep forgeting the key word directly.
Not even close. Thunderup and his got fartcatcher in 2014 after they lost my Spurs Thunder ELE are number 1 on the list.
You'll also notice each of them are Trumpies. Bunch of deplorables who would be the first ones to run from a bet.
At least I'm still standing by our bet. Once TSA produces direct evidence from Assange to Hillary then I will honor it.
I don't gaf about a bet but the wiki leaks thus far have been a total dud and everyone knows it.
You've confirmed your terms, thank you. Your white knights RG and Fuzzy must feel even stupider than you at this point.
Here were your terms, and you even made them very clear as you so felt the need to point out
you said Assange had nothing more "on" Hillary and you needed to see do ents of Hillary doing "such and such".
Only a person as stupid as yourself would start with lets be clear and finish with such and such.
Assange provided not only emails "on" Hillary but also "such and such". You call them mundane and talking points but that email was classified information on strategies dealing with ISIS.
You've shown how stupid you are, go out with some dignity and honor your bet. Kill your account or forever be known as not only a eel her but the stupidest poster here since Norcal.
How many times are you going to say stupid? Is that the only word you know?You've confirmed your terms, thank you. Your white knights RG and Fuzzy must feel even stupider than you at this point.
Here were your terms, and you even made them very clear as you so felt the need to point out
you said Assange had nothing more "on" Hillary and you needed to see do ents of Hillary doing "such and such".
Only a person as stupid as yourself would start with lets be clear and finish with such and such.
Assange provided not only emails "on" Hillary but also "such and such". You call them mundane and talking points but that email was classified information on strategies dealing with ISIS.
You've shown how stupid you are, go out with some dignity and honor your bet. Kill your account or forever be known as not only a eel her but the stupidest poster here since Norcal.
You already tried and failed when you made this thread. You tried to pass off the transcripts exerpts from a random guy to be the thing that got me off the board..then that failed and you tried to say the latest email in which talking points were being discuss to be the "it" thing.
You have failed again.
Everyone knows these leaks have been a total fail thus far that have had zero consequences to anyone let alone Hillary.
You dont dictate . The rules are the rules.
You cant make useless information into legit information just because.
Also, you didn't answer my question.
How did wikileaks get this information? Was it lifted from John Podesta or Hillary?
TSA's reading skills are just as ty as ever.
You want to jump in on this go ahead. You'll only kill the account you are white knighting for.
Here are his terms. Explain how a hacked email of classified information between Clinton and Podesta released by Assange doesn't check off all of them.
" Originally Posted by Reck
I'm fairly confident. This guy has nothing more on Hillary.
And let's be clear. There needs to be do ents about Hillary doing such and such. Not some indirectly bull like the DNC hack."
I'm not calling you stupid as an insult, it is just what you are. Your rant now is just more proof.
You poorly worded your terms, you continue to confirm those were your terms. You were told by multiple posters not to accept those terms, you ignored them and accepted your terms.
You are a ing idiot.
You are a pussy.
You are a welcher.
Its always more fun when someone welches, this place never forgets. You've already gotten top 3 recommendations. Congrats welcher, this may be a positive as people may now forget stupidity as your top trait.
Holy . Mega re sighted.
You dont get to call anyone stupid when you're candidate #1 when it comes to posting stupid . Not even ducks level. You go beyond Ducks and boutons level. For sure, undisputed.
I haven't welched because Assange and wikileaks have yet to release direct information from and of Hillary.
Oh and..
how did wikileaks get this information? Was it lifted from John Podesta or Hillary?
Why are you avoiding answering those questions? Top 3 recommendations the re says.
You seem to be stuck on stupid. How many times are you going to post that?
I've already posted it myself and it doesn't show anything that haven't been posted before. Grow a brain.
Not some indirectly bull like the DNC hack.
Reading is tough.
As many times as it takes your undeveloped brain to realize "on Hillary" is not the same as "from Hillary". You set the "on Hillary" terms not me. And even when you try and squirm out of that you lose because an email discussing classified information between Clinton and Podesta released by Assange 100% falls under "Hillary doing such and such". Again, your terms.
Welch on Reck
been a while since I read any of the DNC hack but I'm pretty sure none of it had actual Clinton emails and was more her campaign member staff amongst each other. Correct me if I'm wrong
Your lack of understanding is scary.
You're angling and you're doing it wrong. I said directly on Hillary. What's so difficult to understand?
how did wikileaks get this information? Was it lifted from John Podesta or Hillary?
Answer the questions and then ask yourself if that meets the terms agreed.
Perfect place for the o'keefe video he promised last week
NYC dem election commissioner----voter fraud
o'keefe said he's also got a Hillary Clinton saying niggger video coming out Monday. He's kept his word up until now.
https://mobile.twitter.com/0HOUR1__/...10776733626368
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
