Reply With Quote
Just more crybaby .
Just more crybaby .
Be that as it may, Trump is putting people who not only oposed him while he was campaigning--but they are also ultra insiders.
That swamp got even more swampy after all.
Putting them where or are you using a golf term?
Nothing wrong with surrounding yourself with people who aren't ass kissers (though Romney is an exception, huge ass kisser).
Clinton slammed Obama during the primaries, but he made her SoS. He was lauded as a visionary and given the Nobel.
Once again, the left is using the same old post-Brexit playbook that didn't work then and won't work now.
Yeah, butObama didn't run as a non political outsider like Trump did. These picks are putting into question what he ran his campaign on.
Yeah it is a problem if the non ass kissers have no fckn clue what they are doing.
Im gonna trust that they have a clue. Give em a chance.
If it offends you, then it shouldn't matter how he ran. Did you vote for Trump?
So Mattis has no clue about defense but somehow a guy who only reached 1st Lt does, because he was appointed this or that?
Name the individuals who have no clue. If he wanted that, Trump could have picked ass kissers. That's the point of choosing the best for the job instead of an ass kisser. Meanwhile John "3 Purple Hearts" Kerry and "wife of Bill" Hillary were somehow qualified to be Sec of State.
On how to actually run a government? Are you fckn serious?
How bout chief of staff Bannon. This man knows experts? You are nuts. This man knows propaganda.
And try reading my whole post again chief.
Mattis doesn't need to "run a government". There are a host of people qualified to do that.
Anyhow... Reince Priebus says hi. When was Bannon made the chief of staff?
Last edited by DMC; 12-04-2016 at 07:04 PM.
Hmm...
When were you sure any appointment is as announced?
Are you kidding about running a government? I'm not talking about collating papers. You don't think he may want to reorganize hierarchy? You don't think this has any affect on how a department is run?
"How is that hope and change working out for you?"
Meh. Seen it before.
So then just pull some random name out of your ass and call it Chief of Staff, why not?
Who exactly are you referring to by "he"?
Let you know in a few months. Right now your tears are excellent.
Only a small minority of his supporters will have regrets - the majority of Trumpkins don't even care about policy.
Most Trumpanzees would be happy for Trump to take a dump in their mouths - so long as a nearby liberal is forced to smell it.
That is sheer fallacy as you guys would have been even worse, hence the continued facade of moral superiority and continuing to fight a fruitless fight. This amount of butt hurt from iden y politics prac ioners is the most obvious obvious-thing, ever.
That's it. Sour grapes taste so much better from a 3rd person view.
Mattis.
And Priebus.
Yeah it was random. I got trolled by Donald. It's tough a tough thing figuring out what Donald really means and what he says and what THE MEDIA predicts he means.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/1...ategist-231304
Bottom line: You are nuts if you don't think people in these positions have no effect on how a department is run. Especially when the swamp is drained and all the politicians are gone.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
