gun owners

[CosmicCowboy]

Fundamentally you're asking how law enforcement would use a registry to find criminals, but I'm not sure the goal of a registry would be to aid in law enforcement after the fact. Whatever system they decide on, the goal should be to reduce the ability of criminals to get the guns in the first place.

Law abiding citizens are already going through the check before they buy guns.

criminals are going to be criminals. if they are willing to murder someone which is clearly against the law a gun registration law won't stop them.

[Spurminator]

It's about controlling access. Nothing is going to stop crime 100%.

[CosmicCowboy]

It's about controlling access. Nothing is going to stop crime 100%.

We already control access. The issue is a registry.

[clambake]

Law abiding citizens are already going through the check before they buy guns.

criminals are going to be criminals. if they are willing to murder someone which is clearly against the law a gun registration law won't stop them.

pretty simple. what is wrong with people.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Law abiding citizens are already going through the check before they buy guns.

criminals are going to be criminals. if they are willing to murder someone which is clearly against the law a gun registration law won't stop them.

Have to love regurgitation of NRA rhetoric. If only it was so simple to divide the world into black and white, citizen and criminal.

[clambake]

oh....and having several legally registered guns makes it easy to hide the illegal guns.

[CosmicCowboy]

Have to love regurgitation of NRA rhetoric. If only it was so simple to divide the world into black and white, citizen and criminal.

Love the goty regurgitation of Boutons level logic.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Love the goty regurgitation of Boutons level logic.

So you have nothing so instead go for this tactic of baseless insult. Not surprising considering you are not even thinking for yourself.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Here's the shortcut version: do you trust the federal government with that list?

Go.

The list will be abused.

Already happening in CA.

http://www.guns.com/2015/11/20/attor...tion-is-legal/

[spurraider21]

off topic

how will ownership of handguns protect you from federal government tyranny?

[CosmicCowboy]

So you have nothing so instead go for this tactic of baseless insult. Not surprising considering you are not even thinking for yourself.

Coming from the got who can't answer the simple question...what is the practical purpose of a gun registry?

[Spurminator]

We already control access. The issue is a registry.

We don't control access sufficiently.

[Chucho]

So you have nothing so instead go for this tactic of baseless insult. Not surprising considering you are not even thinking for yourself.

He insulted one of your typical posts where you brush off someone dismissively with your tropical nothingness you are so convinced is sage and it isnt, its just more comprehensible Boots garbage like this post. Fuzz, get over yourself. You add nothing and you simply arent intelligent no matter what your mail-correspondence vocabulary tells you.

[CosmicCowboy]

We don't control access sufficiently.

How does a registry control access?

[CosmicCowboy]

of course, the discussion is academic. We know isn't gonna happen on gun control for at least 4 more years. Damn, we are gonna get tired of winning!

[Spurminator]

How does a registry control access?

Any unregistered firearm can be confiscated in a routine stop. People who commit violent crimes can have registered guns confiscated. It's an additional consideration when you're trading or selling guns. Probably a number of other reasons.

[spurraider21]

of course, the discussion is academic. We know isn't gonna happen on gun control for at least 4 more years. Damn, we are gonna get tired of winning!

yeah very academic. i'm right on the issue because the candidate i said i dont like won the election

[DMC]

you guys be sure to tickle the nra's nut sac when you go down on them, i hear they like it when you do that
*choke* *gag*

I'm not a member of the NRA. You think every dissenting opinion can be categorized into some evil group?

[DMC]

yeah very academic. i'm right on the issue because the candidate i said i dont like won the election

You'll never have to worry about that, since you've never taken a stance on anything.

[DMC]

off topic

how will ownership of handguns protect you from federal government tyranny?

Start a new thread.

[spurraider21]

You'll never have to worry about that, since you've never taken a stance on anything.

[DMC]

Arm a prison population and see how they deal with abuse from guards. That should tell you something.

[pgardn]

How does gun registry solve either issue?

Be specific.

If we knew the number of guns in households and businesses we might be able to say something meaningful about claims that guns do or do not lower crime rates in specific areas. This is something everyone wants to know about and the data is absolute crap right now.

Thats why this board can choose any preferred "study" they want to prove what they want about guns. But we know the NRA is scared to death of the CDC. And it took this long... We have already had this discussion.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

He insulted one of your typical posts where you brush off someone dismissively with your tropical nothingness you are so convinced is sage and it isnt, its just more comprehensible Boots garbage like this post. Fuzz, get over yourself. You add nothing and you simply arent intelligent no matter what your mail-correspondence vocabulary tells you.

Outside of recognizing that he had nothing but an insult is the only thing you have right here.

The criminal/citizen rhetoric is NRA propaganda. They spout it in their mailers and meetings. Do you address this? Nope you just double down on more baseless insults.

Sorry that my use of multisyllables bothers you. Intelligent people actually try to show that I don't use the terms correctly or something of that nature. You aren't even able to do that.

Speaking of diction? Tropical nothingness? What sort of gibberish is that?

As for getting over myself? Please point to the part where I make it about me. I see you making it about me. I was talking about NRA rhetoric. I think it is you that needs to get over me. You get caught up in my diction and intercede into every discussion I have. It's typical of people that I have made feel stupid in the past.

It's not me though that is at issue here for all of your attempts to make it so. It's you and your insecurity.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Coming from the got who can't answer the simple question...what is the practical purpose of a gun registry?

Research.

You can track guns and their impact on public health. Researchers have been asking for it for decades at this point. You seem extremely ignorant on the topic if you don't even know that.

Now what that has to do with you spouting NRA rhetoric mindlessly is beyond me. You can keep calling me gay if it makes you feel better but regurgitating propaganda is indicative of someone that doesn't think for themselves.

Insults without basis don't bother me. I'm not that insecure, fattie.