Reply With Quote
Stop being such a pussy.
Just wait until your social media offerings are filtered to avoid "fake news". Wait until the new protocol surfaces that requires IPs and anyone owning a domain to police the content for "truth". Left started the fire with the 2nd Amendment, now the 1st is going to be attacked in the name of safety.
Stop being such a pussy.
It took you pages to even begin to fathom reasons you never considered . You were led around like a little dog. I fed you bits and pieces to allow you to find the obvious.1. Allocating police resources by gun ownership
2. Talking points for the left
It took you how many pages to actually concoct those two worthless offerings? Police resources are allocated by funding and need, which is crime, not gun ownership. Knowing who bought the gun doesn't tell you where that person currently lives, in what regions the guns are or anything else. It's just a precursor step to salve the left gunphobia.
And yeah I have a huge gun phobia. I live in Texas you fool. I can't think of a friend who does NOT OWN A GUN. But they are not NRA lapdogs like you are. I love the outdoors and spend tons of vacation time WITH gun owners. And I personally find guns fascinating. There were no less than 3 guns bought for kids this xmas (for hunting) and time spent explaining safety and dates for practice set.
You ability to catch on is severely lacking.
Still waiting for a legit reason for gun registry.
not sure I understand this.
Yup, DMC's critical thinking is on display. The fixation on Hillary is interesting if not surprising. Mommy issues maybe?
He never rebuts what you say. He used smilies to tell you he laughs at you and then dismissed you as leftist. He is not arguing honestly. It's how he rolls. Instead he tries to dominate a conversation like a dog marking its territory. If anything it underscores that he knows he it's a loser. When he thinks he can win he argues on merit. When he doesn't he does this. Intellectual cowardice is what it is.
You named several public health and safety initiatives and are hardly exhaustive. Then of course there are things that will arise out of the study that are not anticipated. The 2nd amendment is not going away so there fearmongering is baseless.
He has nothing worthwhile in response.
.... conned YET AGAIN by NRA/GunIndustry fake paranoia
Similes. If you're going to act smart at least don't look like an idiot doing it.
"on ignore"
Gun supporter who calls guns 'toys' is promptly shot by toddler son from backseat of car
Her Facebook account is an ode to right-wing political opinions, Second Amendment rights, and anti-immigrant/racist type meme activity. She also thinks Bernie Sanders is a socialist. Yesterday, on her way to see about a horse (she has a passion for horses), one of her—maybe her husband’s—guns found its way into her four-year-old son’s hands.
Putnam deputies found a truck and a horse trailer just after 3 p.m. in the middle of travel lanes on Highway 20 near Rowland Avenue.http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/3...ackseat-of-car
They found 31-year-old Jamie Gilt in the front seat with a bullet wound. Police said Gilt's 4-year-old son shot his mother through the back of her seat as she was driving.
She was taken to UF Health and is in stable condition, according to deputies.
they never grow old.
The emoticons come out. You got nothing left.1. Allocating police resources by gun ownership
2. Talking points for the left
It took you how many pages to actually concoct those two worthless offerings? Police resources are allocated by funding and need, which is crime, not gun ownership. Knowing who bought the gun doesn't tell you where that person currently lives, in what regions the guns are or anything else. It's just a precursor step to salve the left gunphobia.
Two. You fckn can't see more than two.... You want me to list everything WE would like to study that requires some stats on where guns are? Really? You need help old man. You are now reconstructing the argument conveniently leaving out points that I already brought forth.
Do you think gun violence, crime, accidents is important enough to have good data on? (not your surveysYeah, im that crazy leftist Texan that wants guns eliminated...Not)
If its not, why does the CDC think knowing where guns are located IS important?
You really either have no fkn clue, or have lost your case in a most embarrassing fashion. At least you should be embarrassed.
The only relevant stats you might gain from registered gun owners is accidents by registered gun owners....and....duh...you get that information already when there is an accident with a legal gun owner. same with gun violence and crime....FBI already gets those statistics.
So you believe the statistics concerning gun related crimes, accidents, etc... are good enough? We know what's going with what is a public health concern for others. Why does the CDC want more stats? They do work not only gathering gun stats but crunching them and assessing validity. The FBI does not. The FBI is not tasked with this. In fact the CDC has been asked to run better studies to which it replies it cannot. Can you explain this void in good numbers which allows Boots and DMC to put up whatever survey they feel makes their point?
We got really good numbers on a much larger health concern, car injuries and accidents. Wonder why?
News from NRA/GunIndustry fantasyland
Florida’s ‘stand your ground’ law increased homicides by 31 percent — and now they want to expand it
Gun homicides have jumped in Florida by more than 30 percent in the decade since lawmakers passed the “stand your ground” self-defense law.Florida was the first state to pass the law, which allows deadly force if a person believes they faces great bodily harm, and a recent study found an “abrupt and sustained” increase in the state’s homicide rate since then
monthly rate of homicides by firearm had increased by 31.6 percent since the law was enacted in 2005.
“It’s not surprising because when you lessen the standard for self-defense you create more opportunity for the use of deadly force,”
“When you have more opportunity for the use of deadly force you are going to have more fatalities. It’s pretty much guaranteed.”
Florida’s crime rate has been dropping, with few exceptions, since the law was passed — but that trend began a decade earlier, in 1995.
Baxley would like to expand the law by requiring prosecutors to prove the law does not apply in individual cases.
“The stand your ground law has been and will remain a political statement about the cons utional right to bear arms,” Rose said.
“It creates misunderstandings and a more dangerous environment on the streets of Florida.”
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/12/flor...e+Raw+Story%29
What the is the Center For Disease Control doing getting into the politics of gun control?
And how much have those "statistics" on car accidents reduced car accidents?
The answer is ZERO.
ZERO proven cause and effect in your lib story.
The Orange crop has also failed five times in Florida since that law was passed. Damn law cause orange juice to be more expensive!!!!
They are tasked with public health. Why do they gather car statistics? You do realize that the names of different agencies do NOT describe everything they are tasked with? The politics? They have been asked by members of congress to gather numbers. But no funding. You see, when Congrees does debate this because of a Sandyhook or whatever, it is made clear they do not have accurate information. Both sides of the aisle know this.
If the majority of members in Congress thought it was important they would fund it. Obviously it isn't a priority for them either.
Yes of course it is not.
The NRA tells them it's not.
Well there ya go. Democracy in action. Let the whining begin.
Yep.
Drain the Swamp. Donald will F all those lobbyists. Should be interesting. No. actually it won't.
And congrats for finally getting it.
This is what happens when you show your hand early on. The CDC has been down the gun control road before and this is why they have been restricted from doing so again. Guns aren't diseases, they aren't killers. People kill. The CDC can study the living conditions, cultural and economic factors that affect the murder stats. They won't publish the truth though, it's not politically correct. Instead, go after people who are exercising their cons utional rights and treat them like criminals. Make it so that, if an otherwise legal gun owner doesn't register, he's now a criminal. What other right get's monitored to see who's using it? Other rights get monitored to see who's being denied that right.
You really like to wave your hands around and talk about how important gun registry would be because the stats are important. You cannot say how they are important though, just that they are. I think you've already realized you don't have a case here and so you're just stalling. Else you'd make a numbered list of the reasons gun registry is important, other than just saying it's important or "police allocation" and "talking points on forums".
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
