You're either lying or misinformed. I read that article 10 minutes after it was posted, it is where I got the screenshot of the golden shower page I posted on page 1. The only updates are the responses by Trump and Conway. They didn't "walk back" . All those caveats were in the original.
This dossier seems like the kind of thing Wikileaks would have published back when they weren't openly partisan. Given how many news desks it apparently went to in the past few months, I would be very surprised if Wikileaks didn't have it prior to Buzzfeed publishing it.
Too bad... They had potential.
Doesn't Wikileaks have a 100% accuracy track record. Why would you expect them to publish a fake do ent?
It's not a fake do ent. It is an actual do ent that has circulated within the IC and in Congress.
The controversy is over what is in the dossier, no one's claiming the dossier itself is fake.
Yeah but that's based on them not doctoring do ents or inventing do ents. If they published emails, it doesn't matter if the contents of the emails are accurate, just as long as their publication is an accurate representation of the original email
An actual do ent containing fake information.,
got it.
Why would Wikileaks publish a do ent with content that hasn't been verified?
On a humorous side note, my wife had to google "golden shower"...
Did you read it? How would you know it's vadility.
The CIA felt like they needed to have that in their intelligence briefing. It wasn't for nothing. If anything..it was a warning for Trump.
Here is the part I'm talking about. I don't remember reading this when it was originally posted
"It is not just unconfirmed: It includes some clear errors. The report misspells the name of one company, “Alpha Group,” throughout. It is Alfa Group. The report says the settlement of Barvikha, outside Moscow, is “reserved for the residences of the top leadership and their close associates.” It is not reserved for anyone, and it is also populated by the very wealthy."
And here is the twitter timeline with them posting link to the same article ten minutes apart
https://twitter.com/BuzzFeed?ref_src...Ctwgr%5Eauthor
3:29
3:39
No one presented the 35 page dossier to Trump.
The intel community was using it as an example of unverified BS and didn't even bother to present it to Trump. Now it's their fault that CNN reported it as if they had a massive scoop?
Bull .
This basically shows the progression.
This got passed to the CIA and they bit.
Thats what you are saying. So you, in effect, you have done more checking than the CIA who brought this to Obama and Trump.
How are you so good and the CIA so stupid?
Straight shooter...
Wow...
This is straight shooting.
What happens when he is off target...
Why wouldn't they? Are you suggesting if this dossier was an attachment in one of the Podesta emails, they would have withheld that email from their leak? They've never been about validating the content, only the sources.
*unsubstantiated
This is the most predictable response in this thread. I should have made a side bet.
If you were worth the time, I might take a few minutes to remind you who was in office in 2010 when Wikileaks released a ton of classified State department do ents and explain the difference between releasing those do ents vs what they do now, but you're not worth the time so I'm just going to embed this tweet from the official Wikileaks Twitter handle and let you decide if you think this sounds like the Wikileaks of 2010.
Where are you hearing that's how the IC was using it? I'm not sure how anyone whose been paying attention the last 6 months could come to the conclusion that there is anything but a serious cluster happening in the IC... they have a really bad "anonymous source" problem lately.The intel community was using it as an example of unverified BS and didn't even bother to present it to Trump. Now it's their fault that CNN reported it as if they had a massive scoop?
Anyway, CNN didn't publish the dossier, BuzzFeed did. Both said the claims in the do ent were unverified.
Bush was still the sitting president when WikiLeaks released the Republican vice-presidential nominee's private emails. Time to find a new excuse, since this one isn't working.
So you're just going to ignore the 2010 leaks because they also leaked stuff about Bush/Cheney before that, and you're going to call me the partisan one. Okie dokie.
No, I'm just calling your lame excuse what it is.
WikiLeaks has leaked dirt on Republicans under Republican administrations. They've leaked dirt on Democrats under Republican administrations. They've leaked dirt on Republicans under Democrat administrations. They've leaked dirt on Democrats under Democrat administrations. You can't get more non-partisan than that. You're just mad that they don't protect Democrats like our media does.
NBC/MSNBC. I posted the video earlier this morning. I agree about the IC.
And yes the do ent has been stated to be unverified numerous times and yet some people still took it as fact. At least the "fake news" crap pretends that they're telling something legitimate, even though they aren't, so I get gullible people believing it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
