Reply With Quote
We'd be in fourth place and not championship contenders without Patty. Ya don't need to bump every loss. All 15-19 all year.
So still a positive impact player. My .
We'd be in fourth place and not championship contenders without Patty. Ya don't need to bump every loss. All 15-19 all year.
He's had over two weeks of "bad games" and was terrible in the last 6 meaningful games (playoffs) the Spurs played.
But you refuse to be humbled about House. Just accept he's a microwave player and end your dip "Start Patty" crusade.
GTFO
Thanks for 2014, but see ya man!
Spurs will be dumb to spend 50 million on a prime Dana Barros/Eddie House when they have a player like Murray thirsty for a bigger role for 1/12th of Barros expected salary.
I said it at the start of the year, and I'll continue to say it til the summer.
You also said LMA was getting traded.
Wrong. Troll somewhere else.
You even bet me. Weird...
Absolutely....
On another note, if he continues his play of past month he is going to tank his value anyway..35% both FG/3PT in his last 11 games..
Let's ask you for a take, got. Is he gonna keep shooting this numbers over the next half of the season?
Absolutely....
On another note, if he continues his play of past month he is going to tank his value anyway..35% both FG/3PT in his last 11 games..
You don't need to answer it, got.
Let's ask you for a take, got. Is he gonna keep shooting this numbers over the next half of the season?
You don't need to answer it, got.
Look, I was on board with House at the start of the season when he was on fire and Parker was looking like . But defenses have adjusted now and House hasn't got it going in a month. And no, he "always shows up in the playoffs" isn't a valid hope. You hoped for that last year and he responded with 4ppg on .280 3pt, and a wide open missed game winner.
If I'm Pop, House has 5 more games to show me something (really something, like 18 points on good shooting. None of this 10 points on 4-11 shooting horse ) or I'm playing Murray more backup minutes.
Any logical non-player fan would agree. House might've peaked.
Price has got to be free falling. Would anyone really pay this guy 10+ million right now? He should just sign a 4/35 extension with the spurs now before he loses even more.
They better not overpay for a 6ft shooter tbh.
He always shows up in the playoffs, tho
I don't really want him back. Would rather try and trade him for a taller player that does something consistently (in the playoffs).
His play in the postseason will decide it. If he performs well I think the Spurs give him $50-60mil. If not they won't offer any more than $40mil which means he's prolly gone.
Regressing to the low 40% chucker he was post shoulder surgery
Wouldnt pay more than 5M/yr for him
Last edited by TheGreatYacht; 01-27-2017 at 11:23 PM.
Just when I thought I've heard it all. Pay a one trick pony $50-60M to shoot a basketball because he's awful at everything else would be pretty irresponsible. They might as well go out and Sign Teodosic for half that amount and actually get themselves a halfway decent ballhandler and creator.
CROFL..
I am almost in" trade his ass for something before the deadline" camp..
It's so obvious he's gone in the offseason. Only a drunk driving GM wouldn't see it coming and would keep him past the trade deadline, tbh...CROFL..
I am almost in" trade his ass for something before the deadline" camp..
Hope that isn't the case here.
Make a take lukewarm got.CROFL..
I am almost in" trade his ass for something before the deadline" camp..
I know Im in the minority and I dont care, but Id trade him at the deadline.
I said at the start of the year, if Murray progresses to the point where hes deserving of a role by the trade deadline, then Id pack Mills bag myself and get a return for him before the Spurs let him walk in the offseason.
As I said millions of times now, Spurs would be dumb to pay Dana Barros/ Eddie House 40-50 million this summer when they have a 20 yr old PG with all the talent in the world making 1/12th of the estimated salary. Would be terribly inefficient allocating that much money to a 5'11" shooter that cant defend.
Didn't know this was the ing thunder getting rid of all their talented players for the "future".
We're talking about moving Microwave Paddy, so you don't have to worry about thatDidn't know this was the ing thunder getting rid of all their talented players for the "future".
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions