Reply With Quote
Biden lied and he made VP twice.No skin off your , right?
No skin off your , right?
Biden lied and he made VP twice.No skin off your , right?
Like always, you fail to understand a simple word.
Context!
If Hillary's AG did this and LIED under oath to Congess, Repugs would go insane.
context? A Repug did it, so that context means LYING under oath is OK.
unless they can actually confirm that he spoke specifically about the election, he has an out, imo
Obama lied and he was reelected.
under oath?
He was asked twice if he had contact with the Russians without a qualifier stating that it was about the election.
What context?
He was asked if he had contact with the Russians twice. He was not asked if he had contact with the Russians regarding the election.
It helps if you are going to make such claims that you explain the proper context else you sound as you usually do: talking out of your ass.
Frankly why would there be an expectation that a Senate that is evaluating a AG nominee would limit a question about a foreign interest to the election?
Absolutely, Obama was under oath when he lied.
What Jeff Sessions Said About Perjury During The Clinton Impeachment
In 1999, then Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) described perjury claims against President Bill Clinton as “serious allegations.”
“In America, the Supreme Court and the American people believe no one is above the law,” he said. Sessions also voted “guilty” on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice during Clinton’s impeachment trial.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...out%20perjury&
The "law" only applies to non-Repugs.
Clapper lied under oath.
Bannon and Sessions were the architects of Trash's campaign, so Sessions had an overwhelming interest in how Pootin was ing the campaign towards a Trash victory.
I asked about obama
When was this
Why did Sessions LIE under oath?
For the same reason Trash won't expose his tax returns.
They both have something, a lot?, to hide from The Great American People.
Thats ight.
His boy tapper also lied under oath to congress and in front of the cameras. Thye both lied about their secret spy program.
Sorry Clapper mot Tapper. That Clapper even kept his job
Here ya go in case anyone "forgot"
Attorney: Spy chief had 'forgotten' about NSA program when he misled Congress
http://thehill.com/policy/technology...ut-nsa-program
the piece of "forgot" they were spying on all americans and his boss Obama agreed with him
Heres where Obama lied to the world about stopping his spying on allies and congress. He promised it but he did the opposite:
Soon after it was revealed that the NSA was spying on our allies President Obama assured America and the world that we would no longer spy on friendly nations. A new Wall Street Journal report shows that his no spying promise, like so many others made by Barack Obama, was a lie.
The President was so anxious to protect his Iran deal and have something he can call a foreign policy legacy, he decided to keep “certain allies under close watch” and topping the watch list was Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
http://lidblog.com/obama-lied-had-ns...ect-iran-deal/
More fake news by the left.
Sessions, as a Senator on the Armed Services Committee, met with over 20 ambassadors in 2016. One of them was the Russian ambassador. There is no evidence, at all, Sessions met with the ambassador to review Trump campaign strategy, or anything of the sort. The suggestion that our Senators should not be meeting with representatives of foreign governments is ludicrous, especially coming from people who championed the Clinton Foundation meeting with foreign governments frequently to fund their Clinton Foundation and personal enrichment.
The criminal law only prohibits lying to Congress under two statutes — 18 USC 1621 ands 18 USC 1001. Section 1621 requires a person "willfully and contrary" to a sworn oath "subscribe a material matter" which is both false and the person knows to be false. Section 1001 is basically the same, without certain tribunal prerequisites: it also requires the government prove a person willfully made a materially false statement. This requires three elements: first, a false statement; second, the false statement be "material"; and third, the false statement be made "knowingly" and "willfully." A statement is not false if it can be interpreted in an innocent manner. A statement is not material if it is not particularly relevant to the subject of the inquiry. Willfully is a very high standard of proof: it requires the person know they are committing the crime, and do so anyway. None of the three exist as to Sessions.
http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/sorr...-about-russia/
Lol lawnewz.com
Sam Bee on Jefferson Beauregard, Son (of a ) of the South
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoyLYumj7tI
Like I've been saying since yesterday, if they don't have transcripts that confirm what he spoke about, he has an out. Otherwise it ends up being like the Clinton/Lynch meeting
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions