Judge puts restraining order on new Trump travel ban

[TSA]

Going full re .

I'll pay you man, I'll pay you.

I will pay to see your IQ test results. I want to know if the constant stupidity is a schtick or if you're just plain dumb.

[TSA]

http://www.wrapsnet.org/admissions-and-arrivals/

Checking Wrapsnet this morning, here is a summary of the refugees admitted to Hawaii in the last 14 years, 5 months and 10 days:

Of the total 123 refugees they “welcomed” to Hawaii, the largest number (66) were Vietnamese who came in the early years (FY03,04,05). Another 40 were Burmese (most Burmese are Christians). Only 5 from any Middle East country came. In 2004, 1 Iranian was resettled there and in 2013 they got a grand total of 4 Iraqis. None of the thousands of Syrians admitted to the US in the last 2 years were seeded in Hawaii

A smattering of Russians and Ukrainians were placed there over the years.

There were no refugees sent to Hawaii at all in FY11 and last year

[TSA]

Time to put Hawaii at the top of the list for the refugee resettlement program.

[Reck]

I will pay to see your IQ test results. I want to know if the constant stupidity is a schtick or if you're just plain dumb.

Offering money to random guys online.

[mavsfan1000]

Gotta love Judicial Activism.

[monosylab1k]

[TSA]

Offering money to random guys online.

declining money to take an IQ test

[Dirk Oneanddoneski]

Gotta love Judicial Activism.

[Reck]

declining money to take an IQ test

Yes, because clearly I'm in such need of 100 dollars.

Let me quit the high paying job I now hold and live on your 100.

I wonder what I would find if I search for you in the sex offenders database.

More worried about me declining a random dude's money offer than realizing said offer is suspect at best. Gay at worst.

[TSA]

Let me quit the high paying job I now hold and live on your 100.

It's statements like this that have me wanting to see your test results.

Why won't you accept my offer?

[spurraider21]

do you check under your bed and in your closet for scary jews every night?

[Reck]

It's statements like this that have me wanting to see your test results.

Why won't you accept my offer?

The irony is rich coming from a guy known for making one of the most infamous and laughable thread ever. Your credibility is shot right there to begin with. You're a dumbass, there is no arguments to be made there.

Now what's more re ed: (And gay) You offering money to find out something about a guy or that you want to know their IQ number.

Sit your gay ass down.

[ElNono]

Judge in Hawaii is going off feels and not the rule of law. This will go to the Supreme Court now as it should, unlike the first one which would have been DOA.

Well, not quite now. First it has to go to appeals, then if appeals sides with the judge, they can then go to the SCOTUS. The other route is through conflicting rulings.

It's going to take a while, but in the end they'll get something close to what they want.

[TSA]

The irony is rich coming from a guy known for making one of the most infamous and laughable thread ever. Your credibility is shot right there to begin with. You're a dumbass, there is no arguments to be made there.

For even richer irony look no further than the welsher questioning someone else's credibility.

[TSA]

Well, not quite now. First it has to go to appeals, then if appeals sides with the judge, they can then go to the SCOTUS. The other route is through conflicting rulings.

It's going to take a while, but in the end they'll get something close to what they want.

I had forgotten it went to the 9th and clarified later on. It followed their instructions will they rule against their previous ruling?

[Reck]

For even richer irony look no further than the welsher questioning someone else's credibility.

The cucking. Never forget it.

[ElNono]

I had forgotten it went to the 9th and clarified later on. It followed their instructions will they rule against their previous ruling?

I don't think the cases are necessarily the same since the EOs are different. The question is if the Executive rescinded the first EO (I'm unaware), but regardless, this would be a new case.

Also don't forget the appeals' court didn't actually rule one way or another, they just denied the lifting of the TRO, which can happen. It's all depends on the likelyhood of prevailing. With this EO it might be different.

[Reck]

I don't think the cases are necessarily the same since the EOs are different. The question is if the Executive rescinded the first EO (I'm unaware), but regardless, this would be a new case.

Also don't forget the appeals' court didn't actually rule one way or another, they just denied the lifting of the TRO, which can happen. It's all depends on the likelyhood of prevailing. With this EO it might be different.

The bright dear leader wants to go back to the first one. So I'm guessing it's still there in the backlog.

"I think we ought to go back to the first one [executive order] and go all the way" to the Supreme Court, the president told the receptive crowd, adding that "this ruling makes us look weak."

http://www.npr.org/2017/03/15/520342...s-us-look-weak

[TSA]

I don't think the cases are necessarily the same since the EOs are different. The question is if the Executive rescinded the first EO (I'm unaware), but regardless, this would be a new case.

Also don't forget the appeals' court didn't actually rule one way or another, they just denied the lifting of the TRO, which can happen. It's all depends on the likelyhood of prevailing. With this EO it might be different.

In any case I don't see Hawaii having rule of law on their side. This EO was cleaned up unlike the first.

[TSA]

The cucking. Never forget it.

Exactly what do you mean when you refer to "the cucking"?

[baseline bum]

In any case I don't see Hawaii having rule of law on their side. This EO was cleaned up unlike the first.

He should just stick with Syria. That's where the refugee problem is coming from and courts calling it a religious test wouldn't have a leg to stand on there. And accepting Syrian refugees likely isn't very popular in this country anyways. As much as I hate Trump I support not accepting Syrian refugees and it's one of the things I hated most about Obama and Clinton.

[TSA]

He should just stick with Syria. That's where the refugee problem is coming from and courts calling it a religious test wouldn't have a leg to stand on there. And accepting Syrian refugees likely isn't very popular in this country anyways. As much as I hate Trump I support not accepting Syrian refugees and it's one of the things I hated most about Obama and Clinton.

Trump should send every Syrian refugee to Hawaii as they've taken 0 so far. (except Kauai I go fish there a few times a year)

[djohn2oo8]

[spurraider21]

i don't understand this though. SCOTUS justified obamacare as a tax despite obama specifically saying it wasn't a tax. so they ignored the president's words then. but they're taking trump's words into full consideration like this?

i think the first exec order was clearly a religious test because it had provisions about making exceptions for religious minorities. this one though? i don't agree with the policy, but i think it ultimately is legal

[baseline bum]

Trump should send every Syrian refugee to Hawaii as they've taken 0 so far. (except Kauai I go fish there a few times a year)

Or he should stop ing around and do the Syrian travel ban that makes sense and won't be found uncons utional because of a religious test.