Reply With Quote
3-10 2 assists no defense smh can'tthat one paddy krew
but he closed out on a loss
8 rebounds.
3-10 2 assists no defense smh can't
damn, bringing us down from 26 in the 3rd... aussie gonna get dem greenbacks...
If Danny green can just get on track, Spurs would be on a another level.
The Spurs are 30-1 when mills scores in double figures, that's mind boggling. Just score 10 points god damn it.
Well, if he starts, I think that is possible.
I was actually thinking about it during the Thunder game, but why not just start him, especially when TP is out? I mean, I don't see why always bringing him off the bench is the best way to go to supposedly keep that bench unit intact. I think he'd get a better offensive rhythm starting. Does anyone agree with that?
I like having Murray out there because I think he's got superior defensive potential, but if you'd prefer offense and a better chance for Mills to get in a good offensive rhythm, you probably should be starting him rather than keeping him with the bench unit all the time.
"He needs to get over himself" -
If Mills and Green can start shooting the ball with consistency, this Spurs team will be really good. Oh, and we really need Kawhi and LMA back healthy. Put all that together and this team can be really, really good.
That's 3 losses the whole year max on average.
forget last year's playoffs the way mid forgets about his ty takes.
try making up your mind got
I post that as an example because all you morons thought Patty was gonna be the solution to the Parker problem.try making up your mind got
So what happened?
If that series didn't humble your ass, then nothing will.
patty was definitely the solution to the parker problem last night.
and since you're so keen on spurs v okc... tp has shot 28.6% against them this year. patty? 41.2%.
Patty in the last 4 years in the playoffs is better than anything porker has done. And that's including the okc series. Mid being a got per pax.
march was the toughest month of the regular season. we played HOU, OKC (x 2), GSW (x 2), MEM (x 2), CLE. let's take a look at the numbers:
FG% 3P% AST TO PPG tony .387 .278 3.4 1.6 6.9 patty .428 .396 4.2 1.1 10.0
bonus: here's a look at their numbers over the whole season:
FG% 3P% AST TO PPG tony as a starter .458 .338 4.6 1.4 9.9 patty as a starter .479 .442 6.0 0.9 13.6
parker is the biggest liability on the team and should be treated as such.
do i play him over forbes? okay, you got me. i play parker over forbes.
do i play him over murray? nope.
do i start him over patty? nope.
do i want him taking less shots than kawhi, lma, gasol, and patty? you ing bet.
all parker should be doing is practicing his 3 point shot. let him play 15 minutes every other playoff game... there's been moments this season where parker shows his vintage burst of speed. he should be lightning in a bottle off the bench, look to attack. he can't probe like nash or cp3, should stop acting like a game manager.
Fatty Chills cant play vs Staring PGs thou
Dont lie to yourselves spursfans
you acting like tony can
The starting lineup with Porker. Meager net rating...
L.Aldridge, P.Gasol, D.Green, K.Leonard, T.Parker7.3 Net RatingL.Aldridge, D.Dedmon, D.Green, K.Leonard, T.Parker
8.4 Net RatingL.Aldridge, P.Gasol, D.Green, K.Leonard, P.Mills
The lineup looks like its on steroids with Patty.
23.3 Net RatingL.Aldridge, D.Dedmon, D.Green, K.Leonard, P.Mills
14.3 Net Ratinghttp://stats.nba.com/lineups/advance...sort=MIN&dir=1
Shut it down.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
