Explain to me how unmasking USP's caught in foreign surveillance and disseminating to WH staffers to leak to the press is legalTrump finds out there's legal and legitimate surveillance, he rages about it on Twitter, claims it's illegal, and accuses Obama of being the mastermind behind it. Then the public finds out about the legal surveillance and somehow that vindicates Trump
The only thing less credible than Louise Mensch is a Louise Mensch boot licker. Enter Claude Taylor
Why are you so afraid to name who is going down and for what?
who cares about laws anymore.
Hmm now CIA Director has turned on wikileaks after once praising them. lol
The European intelligence agencies detected multiple communications over several months between the Trump associates and Russian individuals -- and passed on that intelligence to the US. The US and Britain are part of the so-called "Five Eyes" agreement (along with Canada, Australia and New Zealand), which calls for open sharing among member nations of a broad range of intelligence.
Explain to me how legal surveillance vindicates Trump saying "Obama illegally wiretapped me
the illegal dissemination is separate from the legal surveillance
Jared Kushner could stay tbh. He seems like a nice chap.
Take the rest though and hang 'em.
have you {heard} about the "five eyes"?
Last edited by clambake; 04-13-2017 at 07:28 PM. Reason: "heard", that other shit doesn't make sense
Legal surveillance became a political tool when it was illegally disseminated to WH staffers to leak to the press
that would be cool.
During the 2013 NSA leaks Internet spying scandal, the surveillance agencies of the "Five Eyes" have been accused of intentionally spying on one another's citizens and willingly sharing the collected information with each other, allegedly cir venting laws preventing each agency from spying on its own citizens.[50][51][52][53]
The 2013 NSA leaks are not entirely new, but rather, they are a confirmation of earlier disclosures about the UK-USA espionage alliance. For example, the British newspaper The Independent reported back in 1996 that the U.S. National Security Agency "taps UK phones" at the request of the British intelligence agency MI5, thus allowing British agents to evade restrictive limitations on domestic telephone tapping.[54]
The mutual surveillance and sharing of information between allies of the UK and USA resurfaced again during the 2013 mass surveillance disclosures. As described by the news magazine Der Spiegel, this was done to cir vent domestic surveillance regulations:
"Britain's GCHQ intelligence agency can spy on anyone but British nationals, the NSA can conduct surveillance on anyone but Americans, and Germany's BND (Bundesnachrichtendienst) foreign intelligence agency can spy on anyone but Germans. That's how a matrix is created of boundless surveillance in which each partner aids in a division of roles.
They exchanged information. And they worked together extensively. That applies to the British and the Americans, but also to the BND, which assists the NSA in its Internet surveillance."[55]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/UKUSA_Agreement
Trump tweets US and Russia will be BFFs
Donald J. Trump
✔@realDonaldTrump
Things will work out fine between the U.S.A. and Russia. At the right time everyone will come to their senses & there will be lasting peace!
8:16 AM - 13 Apr 2017
https://www.cnet.com/news/donald-tru...tag=CAD590a51e
Trash and his coterie are stooges for Pootin
As long as the surveillance is legal, trump was wrong
https://theintercept.com/2017/04/13/...ithin-90-days/
Trump 90 Days Ago: “My People Will Have a Full Report on Hacking Within 90 Days!”
EXACTLY 90 DAYS AGO — on Friday, January 13 — Donald Trump, then president-elect, issued a series of tweets attacking the claims in former British MI6 officer Christopher Steele’s “dossier” that the Russian government had long been “cultivating, supporting and assisting” Trump.
Trump called the allegations “phony” and “totally made up” and pledged that “My people will have a full report on hacking within 90 days!”
No such full report has appeared, nor is there any evidence that an investigation by the Trump administration is currently underway — or was ever initiated.
LOL. Kushner is up to his eyeballs in this .
The liani connection is easy to believe. That old man has been dirty for decades.
but but but he was
Apparently he is spilling the beans on Trump . There is another investigation on Trump from the NY AG. Any state crime Trump is convicted of is not pardon able in the state of NY.
There are currently 10 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 10 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
