The train of baseless accusations with no evidence will continue on no doubt.
How does one interfere in an investigation that didn't exist?
The train of baseless accusations with no evidence will continue on no doubt.
It sure exists now.
lol SA
Deutsche Bank, a major Russian money laundering bank.
What a nutcase.
you nominate the guy for the job and you're already maligning him.
So he didn't interfere in his own investigation.
TSA:
C O V E R U P
If Trash and his entourage were being witch hunted, they wouldn't be lying, forgetting, obfuscating. They could and would prove their innocence, so they could get on with #MAGA.
Why don't they come clean?
The C O V E R U P is blatant, UNDENIABLE
btw, the Trash and team's "collusion" was, in my laser-like perception, passive, silent.
Pootin's boys made sure Trash's entourage, and Trash were informed, that the Russians were ing the campaign, attacking Hillary, fabricating fake news all over social media, to elect Trash, expecting fully, wink wink, they would be repaid, which is EXACTLY what Trash has been, and will be doing.
Mueller may have to recuse himself
RandomGuy you're the self proclaimed conflict of interest specialist what's your take?
must be the most sophisticated cover up the world has seen as the FBI, CIA, and NSA still haven't been able to find a shred of evidence.
large red mad font
PROVE IT.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 06-16-2017 at 07:43 PM.
lmao reaching.
Im most definitely not a lawyer or an aspiring one but where is the conflict of interest? Comey is a potential witness, that's it.
the fact they might be friends shouldn't have to matter unless they're ing each other.
then again, spurraider21 and the other lawyer in the house should have concrete and a definitive answer.
also, Rosenstein would have known if this would be a problem already.
Uhhhh Comey?
He left him on. He could have immediately let him go. Especially since Trump claims he was going to fire him using his crocodile tears concerning Hillary very early on. Trump has said this. He was planning to get rid of Comey post haste.
Is he going to fire his DOJ hires who appear to be following a more even handed approach now? Has the investigation been dropped? Did he fire Sessions for properly recusing himself? Is the Special Counsel fired yet?
Last edited by pgardn; 06-16-2017 at 08:13 PM.
i dont see how there's a conflict of interest if comey isnt the subject of the investigation.
the result of the investigation or potential charges are completely inconsequential as to comey. he doesn't stand to benefit from it one way or the other.
i'd have to sift through case law on what cons utes a conflict on interests in this scenario to be certain, and i dont have a ton of time. my gut says no. if you have to recuse yourself because you have a conflict with any tangentially related party to an investigation, then how the can people in government ever be investigated without a conflict somewhere?
how can anybody in the FBI investigate if comey was the director of the FBI...
goddam, y'all right wing nuts are ing stupid.
y'all's Big Orange Turd is going down and all y'all's dumb takes can't stop it
Comey is NOT the "subject of investigation or prosecution"![]()
I'll just bet you don't.
Flynn flips on Pence. Pence lawyers up then hosts super pac dinner parties to pay for his legal fees![]()
question only remains open to you. just like the Earth is still flat to some people.
lmao, keep laughing at other peoples sources while providing BOOMs from "the chairman of @trumpstudents"
Trump and Sessions have power to make investigate.
You tell me why they not make investigate.
Bob Mueller and the Kushner client conflict question
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN18R2SU
Rosenstein may need to recuse himself from Russia probe: ABC News
U.S. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein has privately acknowledged he may need to recuse himself from matters relating to the Russia probe,
given that he could become a potential witness in the investigation,
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-rosenstein-idUSKBN197207?feedType=RSS&feedName=politicsNews&u tm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign= Feed%3A+Reuters%2FPoliticsNews+%28Reuters+Politics +News%29
Republicans are already placing their bets on who Pence will pick as his VP after Trump
the latest Republican “parlor game” focuses on who current Vice President Mike Pence would choose as his own VP should President Donald Trump be impeached.
Played in “the shadows of the Russia investigation,” this VP speculation game focuses on the desired “effect” each speculative vice president would have on the country.
The choice of Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan or Nikki Haley would result in a “return to normalcy,”
while Bob Gates or John Boehner would help ease the “anxiety” created by Trump.
Picking Joe Biden or Michael Bloomberg, Axios noted, would “calm the country”
by assuring them there would be no Trump-era status quo in the White House, whereas someone like
Jeff Sessions, Rudy Giuliani or Newt Gingrich
would “keep the spirit of America First Trumpism alive.”
http://www.rawstory.com/2017/06/republicans-are-already-placing-their-bets-on-who-pence-will-pick-as-his-vp-after-trump-report/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaig n=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story%29
![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)