Reply With Quote
Oh, and funny that this was the best deal he could get on the open market.We couldn't afford 3 years 20million for him?I thought someone would give him way more.
It wasn't about cost, homie. He didn't want to be here.We couldn't afford 3 years 20million for him?
Oh, and funny that this was the best deal he could get on the open market.We couldn't afford 3 years 20million for him?
This is probably the day racist PATFO had it.
The last guy that could wake up those fat AT&T Center fans. Gone. For 6Mthat dunk
Kawhi running Simmons out of town.
This place and the theories. Golden
Fake news
Ah so just more silly nonsense, gotcha
I didn't really want Simmons on a big contract but 3 yrs/20 million is a pretty team friendly deal. I wouldn't mind paying that much for some bench atheticism. Guess he just wanted a bigger role. Murray now has all the opportunity to prove himself. Unless he gets traded soon.
Which interviews ?Yep. He made that pretty clear in several interviews.
He wasn't a spur at heart. He had zero loyalty to the Spurs (not that he should), but maybe wasn't quite appreciative of the opportunity he was given. He's been trying to get to this point for a long time. He wanted money way more than anything else and that is totally understandable.
Spurs just dont don't feel he is worth what he could get elsewhere, and I probably agree. I don't expect him to continue his same line of progress in another system,, and I don't see him being motivated after making that pay day. Few "diamonds in the rough" that have left the Spurs have continued on to be successful somewhere else. A lot of people are acting like we let a future all star leave
white, Paul, and or blossomgame can probably become what Simmons is and then some
I'll miss those sky high blocks. He is a solid defender. Magic made a good move. Wonder if they trade frenchie at the deadline to make Simmons their starting SG.
Exactly! I think he's worth more than what he got.
That still translates to around the same or a better deal for Simmons who has done a whole lot less
Well... I'm not going to get on that bus. I'd much rather have $6 Million in cap space than Simmons. I do expect the Spurs to fill in the "void" Simmons left really easily.
So we have 6 mil in cap space now? I know it was rumored about us giving Simmons 9mil/yr, but how does him not signing affect us?
Is that 6 mil left for Pau/*Manu(replacement maybe?) Im a noob to the cap stuff
The Spurs should not have cap space this year, but they do gain room under the apron to give Pau a one-year deal (as opposed to a two- or three-year deal) to make him whole. Next year, they WILL have that cap space, though.So we have 6 mil in cap space now? I know it was rumored about us giving Simmons 9mil/yr, but how does him not signing affect us?
Is that 6 mil left for Pau/*Manu(replacement maybe?) Im a noob to the cap stuff
Good for him, hopefully he doesn't blow it all on child support. I appreciated his time on the club tbh.
Just lost one of the defenders needed for beating the Warriors. You need at least 4 really good defenders and 5 if they play their death lineup.
Gotcha.. so what could they offer $ wise to Pau/ potentially Manu? Vet Min's?
Sup ? Nice to meet you.
Cosigned
Why would anyone give more money for a player that sucks so much?We couldn't afford 3 years 20million for him?
his dumbass agent overplayed his hand. Genius.
Simmons for the vast majority of the season was a below replacement player anyway. Not really going to shed a few tears for a guy that never really improved his outside shot that much, but could throw a few dunks down and play some D.
Spurs need shooters more than anything else.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
/cdn0.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/8318413/leonard2.0.gif)