Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[Pavlov]

no you still don't have it right. Here is the correct version.


Person A: this is my timeline

Person B: your timeline is wrong

Person A: how?

Person B: fix it by adding these two items

Show me where put items.

[TSA]

For the fun of it, I did a quick search and went into the first results and what a surprise...



For context:







And a bonus one for the lulz.





You can just read the whole thing on that particular thread where TSA keeps pedaling links hoping and talking about the impeding indictments here:

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...256863&page=14

So there you go guy. Proof that you pedaled/wanted/talked about her getting indicted.

not going to waste time trying to prove a positive
wastes time trying to prove a positive
proves option b

Your record is abysmal.

Hillary will be indicted soon

Except you had such a hard on for Hillary going to jail that you actually did. You literally spent your days pedaling pending indictments are coming! indictements are coming every single day on here. That is undeniable. I'm not going to waste my time proving a positive.

b. attempt to back your claims and try and argue "should" = "will"

I called it from the start.

You claimed I said Hillary would be indicted, the quotes you pulled said I thought she should be indicted. You just on yourself in the same manner as the "on Hillary"/"from Hillary" that forced you to welch

Thank you for ting on yourself Reck. Sleep it off and regroup tomorrow

[Chris]

[Reck]

Cue the deflection..

You're now moving the goalpost in asking me to prove something else.

When and if I do you'll just have another sorry excuse. You're a pussy that way.

AND...BAM!

Deflection achieved.

not going to waste time trying to prove a positive
wastes time trying to prove a positive
proves option b









I called it from the start.

You claimed I said Hillary would be indicted, the quotes you pulled said I thought she should be indicted. You just on yourself in the same manner as the "on Hillary"/"from Hillary" that forced you to welch

Thank you for ting on yourself Reck. Sleep it off and regroup tomorrow

Only took me 2 minutes to search and quote these.
asks me to prove it, I do, he blames me for proving it.
If she's not indicted this world is a lie!

[Reck]

She'll be indicted after receiving the nomination and then the Democrats will throw out a Biden/Warren ticket giving Obama the third term he's always wanted.

Leave, brah or I'll just keep going in raw.

[spurraider21]

I think she'll be indicted in March on the server issue and indicted again over the summer on her foundation issue.

They've already got enough, it will be up to Lynch. I almost hope Lynch refuses to indict, the storm of leaks that would come out from the FBI would be amazing.

She'll be indicted after receiving the nomination and then the Democrats will throw out a Biden/Warren ticket giving Obama the third term he's always wanted.

ITT lobs clinging to the hope of no indictment. Literally their only chance.

[spurraider21]

the irony of hoping for FBI leaks

[Reck]

Holy .

What an assist.
TSA time to perma ban.

[Pavlov]

But my timeline.

[TSA]

Leave, brah or I'll just keep going in raw.

hmmm...a prediction in jest based on the context of a HuffPo article. I'm not sure I can give you that one. Besides....

You literally spent your days pedaling pending indictments are coming! indictements are coming every single day on here.

Your going to need more than that as it's no where close to claim of indictments are coming every single day. Keep digging Reck, best of luck!

[TSA]

Third post is what Reck found, already addressed. Your other attempts failed as those aren't claims of an indictment coming. Almost a complete waste of your time.

[TSA]

Holy .

What an assist.
TSA time to perma ban.

Besides the one you quoted none of those are claims of indictments coming.

what an assist
what a re

perma ban? for what?

[TSA]

But my timeline.

Fix it.

[TSA]

Reck I have confidence you can find much more as I was claiming indictments daily. I'll check back in tomorrow.
Do not let me down.

[Pavlov]

Fix it.

I think timeline perfect. Show me where put items.

[spurraider21]

Third post is what Reck found, already addressed. Your other attempts failed as those aren't claims of an indictment coming. Almost a complete waste of your time.

I think she'll be indicted in March on the server issue and indicted again over the summer on her foundation issue.

no?

[Reck]

hmmm...a prediction in jest based on the context of a HuffPo article. I'm not sure I can give you that one. Besides....



Your going to need more than that as it's no where close to claim of indictments are coming every single day. Keep digging Reck, best of luck!

Are you literally re ed?

It doesn't get more personal than saying I think and she will.

They're your own stipulations to boot.

You and I both know you would only find posts of me saying "should be" and not "will be"

If I claimed Hillary was going to be indicted

You claimed I said Hillary would be indicted,

Moron, can you even tell me what the past tense of will, is?

Stop embarassing yourself.

[TSA]

no?

"I think" is not a definitive statement.

[Pavlov]

"I think" is not a definitive statement.

It definitive about what you think.

[Reck]

"I think" is not a definitive statement.

You literally said she would be indicted.

She'll be indicted after receiving the nomination and then the Democrats will throw out a Biden/Warren ticket giving Obama the third term he's always wanted.

No speaky de english?

[spurraider21]

"I think" is not a definitive statement.

what? ... any time somebody claims something will happen, that means they think it will happen.

that is a pretty awful attempt at spin, but i cant really blame you since you've backed yourself into a corner

[TSA]

Are you literally re ed?

It doesn't get more personal than saying I think and she will.

They're your own stipulations to boot.







Moron, can you even tell me what the past tense of will, is?

Stop embarassing yourself.

Im not trying to play gotcha because of the word tense you moron


Hillary will be indicted
I think Hillary will be indicted

[TSA]

You literally said she would be indicted.



No speaky de english?

Comment was made in jest, the Obama third term line should have been a dead giveaway.

[Pavlov]

Hillary will be indicted

Means you think Hillary will be indicted.

I think Hillary will be indicted

Means you think Hillary will be indicted.

[Chris]

Libs ITT