Pretty sad when 100% of your posts and presence here is to defend Trump. You should ask to be on their payroll at least. All this heavy lifting and not even being recognized for it.
Sad state of things.
Well, Jack will have more time to investigate Comet Pizza.
Pretty sad when 100% of your posts and presence here is to defend Trump. You should ask to be on their payroll at least. All this heavy lifting and not even being recognized for it.
Sad state of things.
Dude called a bona fide war hero an Islamist agent.
He mopped the floor with her f'n ass!
Give us the Cliff Notes of what Morris said over the 45 minute video you totally watched.
In your own words.
Thanks.
do my homework for me
![]()
More like "prove you watched a 45 minute video of a Morris in a pink shirt sitting in a pink chair."
Looks like you didn't.
Thanks for proving it.
I did my research and have nary to prove. Try stepping outside your bubble for a few minutes; I watched Maddow for about 20 seconds the other night![]()
You posted a video as if it means something, and when someone asks you for a two sentence summary, you say "do my homework for me", i.e. trying to get someone else to do your work for you...
The irony... it burns.
Not 45. You aren't a reliable source of information since you can't even summarize a 45 minute video you totally watched.
Just say you refuse to watch the video. All that other nonsense is well...nonsense.
Jesus Christ.
![]()
I'll strongly consider watching it if you can summarize the 45 minutes first. It shouldn't be that hard for you since you totally watched the whole thing.
For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.
-John 3:16
But you watched it. Posted it.
You are the one expected to explain point A and B. Not tell the other guy who has no interest in watching said 45 minute video to watch it.
You can tell Chris is beat when he retreats to scripture.
He talks about the the CIA chief in Moscow disavowing any collusion. He talks about his tenure with Bill Clinton during his presidency to establish credibility. He explains the timeline and chain of events pre and post election. He fields questions about Russiagate.
It's a regular hoot and a holler - saavy?
Not at all. He invoked the name ITT, not me.
Oh, Daniel Hoffman? Already read about him without watching for 45 minutes. It's possible that the meeting with Uday was just to screw with the election in a general sense like he said, but I'm fine with investigating it fully to make sure.
Don't you want to be sure?
You don't have to slobber every time the bell rings.
You'll talk to everybody in sentences & candor except me.
What, I'm a butter & egg man? I got cooties?
Ok that's fine, but by that same token don't we want to be sure about the Clinton mafia as well? You routinely laugh off investigations into Hillary and Bill. Don't you dare ding me.
*ding*
Sorry. I have to stick with the shtick.
I routinely laugh at the Clinton investigations because they've been completed several times over with no charges. Which one do you want to start up again?
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)