Reply With Quote
What will ultimately be ironic is that Trumps business a en consisted of looking the other way when no one else would touch this with a 10 foot pole.
That isn't business sense. That is the exact opposite.
I bet Sater, Manafort, Flynn have been shown the govt's irrefutable evidence of felonies, and have already or are negotiating plea deals to rat out Trash, his kids, his companies, all tied to Russian $100Ms, and maybe Rep of Georgia.
Hilarious if Wilbur Ross went down also for his Cyprus/Russian involvement.
What will ultimately be ironic is that Trumps business a en consisted of looking the other way when no one else would touch this with a 10 foot pole.
That isn't business sense. That is the exact opposite.
Republican Congressmen Just Met Assange To Suggest Trump Will Pardon Crimes Against Hillary
suggest that Donald Trump could pardon the Wikileaks publisher if he is charged with crimes for his role in harming Hillary Clinton’s campaign on behalf of Russian dictator Vladimir Putin.
the House GOP Foreign Affairs Committee member wants to give complete legal immunity to the very person who assisted his party in last year’s election by spreading stolen Democratic National Committee emails for Republican propaganda purposes.
http://washingtonjournal.com/2017/08...rimes-hillary/
So who here still believes that Russia hacked the elections to get Trump elected?
never cared about that.
follow the money
Chris asks this every day.
Then he says Hitler did nothing wrong.
I agree tbh
Why can't you answer a simple question?
Then he says Hitler did nothing wrong.
17 Intel agencies.
My answer is the same as every time you ask your stupid question. There is definitely enough that has been proved to happen to justify an investigation.
Which is happening.
Wrong:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/29/p...2017.html?_r=0A White House Memo article on Monday about President Trump's deflections and denials about Russia referred incorrectly to the source of an intelligence assessment that said Russia orchestrated hacking attacks during last year's presidential election. The assessment was made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence community.
Where did I say it was 17 American intel Agencies? German intel, British intel have all passed over materials to US intel showing Trump's involvement.
Technically, yes.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...-either-way-r/Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which is an umbrella agency that oversees all 17 organizations.
If the main agency that oversees all the organizations is saying yes, you can assume they speak for the rest.
Either way, I would just go with the consensus that the 4 main Intelligence Agencies affirms Russia meddled. I mean, what can the Coast Guard say about hacking? That's not their main job.
Nothing has been proven. Mueller is wasting everyone's time.
Prove he is.
Trump's son, son-in-law and campaign manager met with agents of the Russian government to discuss getting dirt on Trump's opponent in the presidential election.
Proved.
Yup, and no dirt was delivered. Nothingburger.
This is what the investigation is for.
So Chris cant say whether it's true that Mueller is wasting his time then?
What crime was committed with the meeting?
In saying nothing, the Coast Guard had a better assessment than the agencies that said the DNC was hacked.
This is what investigations are for.
Jesus, I have to hold your hand like Chris.
I'm content to let the investigation go where it may. Enough has happened to warrant it. Sorry.
What crime "might" have been committed with the meeting?
How so? Because Julian Assange says so?
He keeps saying he has prove but doesn't provide said prove.
Sorry but I'll trust our agencies over Assange any day.
Is enough to make Mueller add it to his investigation. Who knows what will come off it.
It's a mistake to focus on ~20 minutes of a year-long campaign. The investigation started before the revelations of the meeting, so it's safe to say that's not the only reason for the investigation. I only used that as an example of what has already been proved.
I hope you understand.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Posting Permissions
