Reply With Quote
How long can these psychotic breaks last? He's apparently been casing concerts for a while and didn't build up his arsenal in a day or two.
Just told you what I did. I know one lawmaker's position but not the others.
Have you dropped your pizzagate investigation entirely?
Serious question.
How long can these psychotic breaks last? He's apparently been casing concerts for a while and didn't build up his arsenal in a day or two.
You failed to answer the question. I didn't ask what you did but why. Why do you about gun control and bumpfire stocks and then choose to do nothing about it?
Going as well as your Mueller time investigation....zero indictments.
That will be akin to a class 2 manufacturer violation, just like sawing off a shotgun barrel or stock and creating a SBR or AOW. You can even make a sear quite easily, but try registering it or getting caught with an unregistered one.
If the design itself is outlawed, the large majority of folks won't build one because it's illegal and 10 years in the pen doesn't sound good. This is probably why the shooter in Vegas didn't use a fully automatic weapon though he could have legally purchased one OR built his own.
Since I just did something, your question is moot.
Have you dropped the pizzagate investigation entirely?
As long as the medication/drug is in his system.
Nice dodge. About what I would expect. Can't bring yourself to admit you were wrong, and your precious 4chan was full of .
It isn't the end of the world, dude.
The number of problems and concerns I have are vastly beyond the time available to do anything about. Were I to guess, chumpy would answer the same.
Relevence?
You going to try for the failed tu quoque line of reasoning too?
You answered half of the question, try again. Why do you about gun control here and then admit to doing nothing about it?
The idea is to debunk the notion that the gun ban had a positive effect made evident by the lack of a shooting spree. It's like saying that the spare tire in my trunk prevents me from getting a flat since i haven't gotten one during the entire time I've had the spare tire, although I only had one flat tire prior.
Just did something about it.
Have you dropped your pizzagate investigation entirely?
The difference between the two of you is that you'll actually try and do something about it. I respect a person who at least tries regardless of whether or not I agree with their position.
what does this art imply
Screenshot of your email to Ted Cruz.
yes, that is what I stated, but I also added that the same logic is applied in the opposite direction. to make the conclusion that this proves nothing is also predicated upon the same logic (or fallacy). One cannot say they have debunked anything much in the same context that one cannot say they have proven something.
No, actually I won't really do anything, other than support Democrats who want gun control. I don't have the time to do something about everything.
Does voting for gun control count?
Why don't we get to have actual popular elections for such things? I don't remember getting the chance recently.
this place is full of a bunch of liberal blowhard do nothingsyou had me fooled RG.
I don't believe you sent any form. You admitted to not doing about it before, no reason you would do about it now because of pressure from an anonymous message board poster.
Well the leading ar15.com theory is that this guy is a liberal and shot everyone up to prove that guns are bad.
TSA, do you subscribe to this theory and would this count as liberal activism in your book?
Great.
Have you dropped your pizzagate investigation entirely?
gone underground to avoid the shariablue shills on voat
So what have you discovered since your last update?
Feel free to bump your conspiracy thread. I can find it if you have problems.
I don't think it was applied in the other direction though I do see the problem with TSA's article, it seems to debunk itself by considering absence of evidence to be evidence of absence. It only allows that in one way however, not the other.
But there has to be a claim, and the claim is that the gun ban was effective, and the evidence cited was the lack of the very rare mass shooting. So a more accurate claim would be "thus far it appears that..." . It would be more accurate than drawing any other conclusion for or against, but since the act of making guns illegal was an extreme measure, you really need more than "jury is still out" to support it when you try to use Australia as an example.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions