Reply With Quote
when you cut a board the wrong size when building a wall
deleting a picture on the computer you did not want deleted that was a idiot thing to do
Give an example
when you cut a board the wrong size when building a wall
deleting a picture on the computer you did not want deleted that was a idiot thing to do
Sheldon Adelson still fuming over theRRaiders-Vegas deal going through behind his back, so he stages a false flag attack to punish them.
Trump still bitter that he actually manages to bankrupt a casino, so he went along with the conspiracy to get revenge on those elitist hotels that generate income.
Also his USFL failure and failure to get a gaming license in Vegas.
IT ALL MAKES SENSE.
Yall s need to quit trippin.
Sprinkle in some George soros and clinton foundation and it all comes together.
Terrorists don't hide their motivations this thoroughly. Quite the opposite.
That was a very odd presser. Seemed like they put the under sheriff up there today to walk back some of what the sheriff previously said. They know less now than yesterday? Something seems off. Maybe they do know the motivation and are figuring out how to release it. Just strange all around.
Withholding information makes no sense at this point -- and again, why would a terrorist not want people to know his motivation?
This theory depends on the integrity of ISIS. Think about that for a second.
ISIS is already losing. It's going to go back to terrorist attacks itself soon for which it can rightfully take credit.
Did you watch today’s presser? If so did it not seem strange compared to yesterdays? Why the new under sheriff? Did you not hear the off camera voice yesterday tell the sheriff “don’t go there” when a reporter asked about a get away vehicle?
It’s very possible Paddock left no clues,no manifest, talked to no one etc but that would be very weird. I’m curious what the story is on his final calls to/from Hong Kong and the UAE.
I'm assuming the sheriff is sleeping for the first time in a few days.
Why would a terrorist of any kind leave no clue to his motivation whatsoever?It’s very possible Paddock left no clues,no manifest, talked to no one etc but that would be very weird. I’m curious what the story is on his final calls to/from Hong Kong and the UAE.
Simply makes no sense.
You're going to go full ar15.com if you keep filling in the blanks yourself. I did a deep dive on Columbine and the UT tower awhile back. I just think what Eric Harris and Charles Whitman might've been like if they somehow suppressed their impulses into their 60s. The reality of Paddock isn't far off from what my speculation for the others would be. It's maddening but I think that's as satisfactory an explanation as I'm ever going to reach.
I mean seriously, one text or email that says "allahu akbar" or " Trump" or "I really don't like New Country" is all this guy had to send and everyone in the world knows what this is about.
With nothing coming out from the investigation the only thing to do is speculate and wait. Nothing wrong with it
As soon as the thing hit the news some white supremecists put out fake reports of a muslim. My guess is that the ISIS dude responsible for their pronouncements pounced on something they read on the internet, and just simply ed up.
ISIS is usually a bit more careful, but a simple -up for a group that is eager for propaganda victories makes sense to me.
You should read this. It would be more than a simple ISIS up.
http://news.siteintelgroup.com/blog/...ut-las-vegas-1
Psychotic break caused by some reaction to a drug of some sort, either prescription, or otherwise.
Just enough to leave the base personality and intellect intact, but just far enough to make mass murder seem logical and required.
Read a couple of descriptions of people in that state, and it is consistent. The mental clues were barely noticeable to the people nearest them, and came off as just "a bit odd", but nothing that raised huge red flags until the very end, when the people sought help and admitted all their thoughts to the psychiatrists treating them.
The brain is a sensitive thing. Unless you are ducks. Then, not so much.
Heard similar on NPR.
ISIS is likely the target of more than on intelligence agency, including that of the U.S. which likely has some pretty well developed capabilities in terms of infiltration.
Would not be surprised if they were given some faked bull to make the thing seem legit to the jackwads in Syria making the claims.
When I was an intelligence analyst, we practiced old-school radio-net infiltration. If the target net didn't do things like simple authentication protocols, you could do some serious damage.
Getting into someone's systems and producing strings of vague emails about an attack would be easy to do.
Since mass shootings happen sadly often in the U.S., it would be an easy way to take advantage of the way humans react to prophecies, in a way that is similar to how people fill in the blanks for fake psychics.
Or just simply hack the internal emails, and when the people responsible for making the claims ask around for confirmation, just fake some emails from the people they are asking that say "yeah, it's one of ours".
Out of 50 ISIS claims she’s studied since 2014 only found 3 to be false.
https://mobile.twitter.com/rcallimac...98590153129984
This could be the 4th false one, or not. I’m keeping an open mind.
So you don't think he's a terrorist? You must be racist according to liberal talking points.
You sound oppressed.
And he pretty much does think he's a terrorist, so you wasted your reach for victimhood.
people denouncing derogatory names while using other derogatory names ftw.
Clark County Sheriff Joseph Lombardo confirmed earlier this week that they found ammonium nitrate in Paddock's car – the same chemical compound used in the Oklahoma City bombing that killed 168 people in 1995. Officials also reportedly found a significant quan y of explosives inside one of his residences.
https://theintercept.com/2017/10/07/...led-with-guns/WE LIVE IN a sick country. A country where it’s legal for someone to purchase 30 assault weapons and unlimited ammunition, weapons that really only have one purpose: to hunt and kill other human beings. A country where a cabal of high-powered lobbyists, bought-off politicians, and gun manufacturers profits off of massacres, where the meaning of the Second Amendment has been twisted so intensely that it no longer matters why it was written or what it was actually intended for.
The leaders of the National Rifle Association, who would be viewed as terrorist enablers and promoters in a sane society, they don’t like the first part of the Second Amendment — so much so that they don’t include it in their very public memorializing of their Holy Bible of gun addition.
The version of the Second Amendment displayed at the NRA’s headquarters doesn’t include the first half of the Second Amendment. The NRA only wants you to focus on the second half, which says, “… the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The first part of the Second Amendment, which the NRA finds too inconvenient to include, states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State …”
Was the Las Vegas shooter a member of a well-regulated militia? No. Were any of the murderers who shot up schools or religious assemblies or workplaces members of a well-regulated militia? No. And regulated — that’s an interesting word, because no thoughtful person can really argue that guns in the United States are actually regulated in any meaningful way. In this country, you can buy dozens of assault weapons. You can store enough guns and ammunition in your garage to wage a small war. Why? Because the Second Amendment has been laundered through lobbyists, and some Supreme Court justices, to mean something it does not mean.
The coalition that fans the flames of fear and promotes the idea that guns keep us safe — that the solution to gun violence is more guns — makes a load of money off of all this death and misery. And they will make more money off of the Las Vegas massacre.
You can murder 20 innocent children between the ages of 6 and 7 at Sandy Hook Elementary School and these villains are unmoved in their belief in the golden calf of assault rifles. “If only the teachers had been armed, those kids might be alive today. Now let’s check out our stock prices.”
Each time we’re faced with a new mass murder with guns, in this case 58 killed and more than 500 wounded, we end up in the same place: “Let’s pray. Let’s tweak this or that law. Let’s talk about using acoustic sensors to detect gunshots. Let’s put armed private security in schools. Let’s use the terrorist watchlist to deny gun purchases. Let’s have more surveillance, more religious and racial profiling.” Which is absurd, given that most mass shooters are white.
None of what most politicians and TV pundits offer up in the aftermath of these killings is going to do anything to solve the real issue: We are a nation filled to the brim with guns, including assault weapons that are actually meant for assaulting people. Not for hunting. Not for sport, unless your sport is murder.
Watch what happens in Congress in the coming days. Empty pla udes. Bull proposals: “We must do something about this.” And, of course, a lot of prayer. But none of that is going to change to the fact that we live in a sick society that believes guns bring us security. A nation that has been taught by powerful, twisted people that guns aren’t part of the problem. That everything except guns — and how easy they are to get — is the problem. Mental illness is the problem. Muslims are the problem. Gangbangers in Chicago are the problem. Not having a gun is the problem. And when these mass shootings happen, most of the time, the shooter is a white man. We want to know who he was, why did it, what his motive was, as we should. But compare that to how black victims of police killings are treated in the media: “Well, did they do drugs? What were they wearing? Did they have a criminal record? Did they listen to hip hop? Where are the fathers?”
After he was killed by George Zimmerman, Trayvon Martin was characterized as a thug, his hooded sweatshirt somehow evidence that he was scary or menacing. That’s how black victims are portrayed. After police shot Tamir Rice, the head of Miami’s police union called the 12-year-old a thug, saying that if you act like a thug, you’ll get treated like one.
Contrast that with some of the stories we’ve seen about the Las Vegas shooter — not victim — shooter! One headline (since changed) in the Washington Post said he “enjoyed gambling, country music, lived quiet life before massacre.” Black victim is a thug; white shooter is a character from a country western song who just happens to murder 58 people. It’s sick. And this is a pattern.
What if mass shootings carried out by white men were covered the same way that stories involving shooters of other races are covered on a daily basis in this country? White-on-white crime. Let’s investigate country music and its violent lyrics. Let’s find some white people brave enough to speak out on this pandemic of white men carrying out mass shootings at an alarming rate. And let’s make them speak for their entire race.
We all know why the narratives are different. And another thing: We’re hearing once again that this is the most deadly mass shooting in U.S. history. It’s just not true. There are several examples of white gunmen killing huge numbers of black people. The 1917 East St. Louis massacreresulted in an estimated 100 black people being shot and lynched; in 1873, between 60 and 150 black people were massacred in Colfax, Louisiana. We don’t even know the exact numbers of Native Americans killed in mass shootings since the founding of the United States: Hundreds were killed in places like Sand Creek, Clear Lake, and Wounded Knee.
Donald Trump, who boasts that he’ll be the best friend the NRA could possibly have in the White House, suddenly found God when he first addressed the Las Vegas shooting. Let’s be real: Trump’s deepest connection to the Bible is watching Charlton Heston as Moses. But religious Trump, who speaks from the Scriptures, was praised for his perfect tone across the media. Specifically, on CNN: “Just what we needed to hear.”
A big part of our problem on guns is how it’s discussed in the media. Presidents who get prayerful are praised instead of held accountable for the role they play in sustaining this nation’s gun addiction, in promoting the gun industry that profits off of murder. When the shooter is an Arab or a Muslim, they are often immediately branded as a suspected terrorist. After Las Vegas, the president and other politicians called this shooter “deranged” or “insane” or another word that’s lost all meaning — “evil.”
When it’s a Muslim shooter, it’s perfectly acceptable to talk about what the U.S. response should be: watchlisting, banning people from entering the country, surveillance of mosques. But when white people do the killing, don’t talk about guns. That’s politicizing the tragedy, disrespecting the victims. Whether it’s someone inspired by ISIS murdering his coworkers or a white man shooting up a school or a white man gunning down Sikhs because he thought they were Muslims, they all do it with guns.
We don’t need prayers. We don’t need fake unity over the tragedy. We need to look at the common factor in all of these heinous acts of mass murder: guns. Anything else is just putting a Band-Aid on a gaping, infected, and lethal wound on our society.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions