Reply With Quote
Are you stupid? This is why I am asking.
Do you know why they would do this?
Are you stupid? This is why I am asking.
You expected to find a sufficient answer here? Are you stupid?
I expected you to be as partisan as humanly possible and not even be curious about this issue because it has to do with Trump.
You have not disappointed.
I learned during the Hillary investigation that it was common practice for government workers to use personal emails, you are not even moving the needle with this attempt.
Of course you will never ever even be curious about Trump or his administration. Your needle will never be moved one iota when it comes to him.
I see SpursTalk continues to have idiots post.
Nobody cared that Hillary used her private account until she started doing so with classified material.
Why can't you Clint- s get that through your heads?
We need an FBI investigation into this hugely important breach of national security.
Right now.
Private email good now.
We get it.
We need to find out how much classified material got emailed. It is hugely important to our national security.
How many FBI agents do you think we should assign to this massive potential breach?
JK and 6 others WH assholes did it
Lock 'em up!
So, you think he is supposed to disclose every foreigner he's ever encountered?
He's supposed to disclose all the foreign contacts the security clearance requires.
He did not.
He left off hundreds.
Why would you want to give him a free pass for that?
If he broke the law he should go to jail. Did he claim to not know how to tell if a do ent is classified?
I don't know the exact rules/laws on disclosures. Is he supposed to all the foreigners he encountered? You didn't actually answer that question.
Since you're too feeble to look up anything yourself, I will perform some charity work.
Here's the basic question on the SF-86 form Kushner was required to complete for his security clearance:
Do you have, or have you had, close and/or continuing contact with a foreign national within the last seven
(7) years with whom you, or your spouse, or cohabitant are bound by affection, influence, common interests,
and/or obligation?
Kushner left off over 100, including his meeting with the Russians in his attempt to collude with them to influence the 2016 election.
Applicants are routinely denied clearance after they have left foreign contacts off the SF-86 form. Why should Jared be treated any differently?
If you have ever been through the clearance process, (I have), yes you are supposed to. He did not.
That is one of the most blatant goal post moves we've seen here. Impressive.
You were the one being feeble, bro. You were saying he shouldn't get the job based on disclosures without stating its significance.
So, that disclosure basically says the relationship has to be continued and substantive and not merely having encountered someone on some occassions. You're talking about "100" contacts who do not necessarily meet the threshold for disclosure. You are pretty pathetic, dude. Enjoy your witch hunt.
And for the record, I don't even like Kushner. In fact, I know he's just another unscrupulous elite. I just LOL at your desperation.
Pavlov (and the actual law) disagrees with you.
Do you have, or have you had, close and/or continuing contact with a foreign national within the last seven
(7) years with whom you, or your spouse, or cohabitant are bound by affection, influence, common interests,
and/or obligation?
you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.
Why are you even trying?
White flag observed, bro.
You didn't even say anything.
Your white flag is recognized and accepted. Enjoy your L.You didn't even say anything.
So all you have to do is spout any ignorant statement and you think you win?
All this says is you're afraid to talk about this anymore.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions