Telfers donations were never disclosed to the public and millions were channeled through CGSCI.
REMEMBER
Telfers donations were never disclosed to the public and millions were channeled through CGSCI.
Oh look more Obama administration under investigation
TSA just doesn't give a about child sex abuse or NSA unmasking anymore.
Weird how his crusade changes in conjunction with whatever new conspiracy theory the right s out.
I'm done answering questions that have been answered in provided links.
Just answer the question Chumpdumper.
Not Russian.
Canadian born in Britain.
Your claim is the Russians funneled millions into the Clinton Foundation.
Trouble is the links prove you are full of .
Those ing rightwingers at The Hill ting out another right wing conspiracy theory
Who controlled Uranium One at that time?
They posted a couple of facts. You and 4channity are producing the conspiracies.
Why do you not give a about child sex abuse anymore, TSA?
You'll have to be more specific. There were four donations from this not Russian person's family foundation.
Sessions replies to Grassley he will not comment on an ongoing investigation. You then ask me what is actively being investigated and expect an answer. Your questions are full of .
Three donations in 2010, 2011, 2012. Who controlled Uranium One at that time?
Sessions did not say there was an active investigation. Damn, another link you provided proves you're full of .
I'll refer you to the same video posted today from the Hill article with Sessions mentioning an ongoing investigation.
Ongoing...active what is the difference?
How is that relevant when it's a British born Canadian giving his family foundation money?
You need to prove it's Russian money being funneled into the Clinton Foundation. Your innuendo isn't cutting it.
He never said there was an ongoing investigation.
http://thehill.com/policy/national-s...uclear-bribery
Why do you continue to lie, TSA?
Just answer the question Chumpdumper. Who controlled Uranium One at that time?
I never once said it came from anywhere in the article, it is in the video with Grassley questioning Sessions. When asked about Clinton/Obama administration Session states it would not be appropriate to comment on any ongoing investigations.
You need to explain the relevance, because I don't see it.
Watching libs try to spin this as no big deal is quite entertaining.
Chumpdumper serious question...are you paid to post in the political forum?
You don't see the relevance of the chairman of a Russian owned company donating millions through a subsidiary of the Clinton Foundation?
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)