Assuming that "military assault style" means the scary black guns they use in the movies, then yes, he could have pulled off the same thing.
I don't know. I'm sure your claim is he could have. Any continued conversation would get bogged down in technicalities and your scoffing at people who don't know the exact terms and jargon. You get mightily defensive about the term assault style rifle because you own and love them. I get it.
Okay, then. We'll play it, straight; I should give a why?If you would have responded any other way than "but muh 2nd amendment
Nope. It's literally one of your fellow crybabies about Trump. If you don't like it, maybe you should switch your .
Would you rather go against bump fire stock or mere rifles? You're a ing moron.
You didn't answer the question.
Why would you buy a bump fire stick for self defense? Give the scenario in which you would use that strictly for defense.
He could have, it's not up for debate. The rifle I posted ITT is no less lethal than an AR15 style rifle. AR15 style rifles aren't the issue.
And I don't own a single assault rifle so that narrative you're trying to steer towards is DOA.
How many bullets does that rifle pictured hold?
See? I already edited because I knew you were going to jump on the technicality.And I don't own a single assault rifle so that narrative you're trying to steer towards is DOA.
This has gone exactly as I predicted. Thank you for going into defensebot mode.
It wouldn't offend me if they were banned. It's you gun freaks that go ape when the talk comes up about the proper term for assault rifles.
So you are good with these not being banned correct?
The question it always comes down to is what is the proper cutoff?
You freaks say "but he could have used a truck, let's ban trucks" but then run away when we start talking about muh 2nd amendment right to bear nuclear arms.
Lets make people with untreated mental illness have to navigate a black market. Good luck with that.
Trump is in South Korea. They dont have this problem. Like, at all. You are 125 times more likely to be shot in the U.S. than in South Korea.
The numbers are even "worse" comparing to Japan.
The stupid talking points used by DMC fall flat because he never says what he really thinks: He likes his guns and doesnt want to give them up. He doesnt care how many mass shootings there are. He's done the same schtick after Virginia tech, Eagle colorado, tucsocn etc.
Holds the exact same amount of bullets as the rifle used by the Texas shooter and has the same rate of fire.
shooter was a 2012 escapee from a mental health facility in NM.
EDIT
To get really precise -- what is the maximum number of bullets that could be in that gun as it is pictured above?
100 rounds
They're for hunting Megadeer, a 20 foot colossus requiring at least 65 hits to take down.
You're telling me there could be 100 bullets in this gun in this picture?
So you are good with these not being banned correct?
Where are they fitting in the gun in this picture?
the magazine is invisible.
Jesus Christ
There could be one bullet in that gun pictured.
The same amount as this one
Do you have a point?
The military is as good at do enting military crime data as it is at accounting for $100Bs it loses every year.
the corporate-welfare/imperial-self-enriching MIC. It's just one of the many scams why most Americans and America suffer.
Dodge #1.
You're telling me there could be 100 bullets in this gun in this picture?
Where are they fitting in the gun in this picture?
I just said one bullet in the gun pictured. You quoted me saying it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
