Mass shooting Sutherland Springs church

[DMC]

No it has not always been the case.
Absolutely not.

Bull . As long as there has been gunpowder, poison, fire.. there has been the ability for one person to kill a mass amount of people in one fell swoop.

[DMC]

Guns that are capable of mowing down dozens of people should be prohibitively expensive, and ideally collector's items that are worth more unused.

No one's running an Aston Martin into crowds of people.

It's very simple to create a sear and modify a receiver to full auto. The full auto sear (transferable) is already very expensive because they are not being manufactured for sale to the public since 1986. So then a full auto that's legal to own is very expensive, but not because it's not been fired. Most of these guns get fired all the time. It's because of the little registration number on the small piece of metal in the receiver that allows someone to build a gun around it over and over. Otherwise the 20,000 dollar Colt M16 is no different than an AR-15 that costs 800.00 at a sporting goods store.

Again, learn about it first, talk about it second. Stop proposing solutions when you don't understand the concept in the 1st place. Just say guns are bad, like the liberal women do, and sit down.

[DMC]

I'm sure suicidal murderers are scared of getting killed.

Are you this stupid? Do you think someone bent on taking as many people with them as possible is going to pick a situation where they are shot right away? no, they want to see the carnage they cause, they want to leave an impression.

In your haste to be pithy you come across as immature and naive.

[Blake]

Right or wrong from a logical standpoint, not a moral one, dip .

Dmc outsourced logic police.

[DMC]

Dmc outsourced logic police.

Blake, whiny lapdog cuck.

[Blake]

Blake, whiny lapdog cuck.

Lol I'm making fun of your original whining, dip

[pgardn]

Bull . As long as there has been gunpowder, poison, fire.. there has been the ability for one person to kill a mass amount of people in one fell swoop.

Totally and utterly stupid.

Its much easier today for a larger % of the population to do the deed.
You are "dead" wrong. It's easier to get info & materials.

[Blake]

It's very simple to create a sear and modify a receiver to full auto. The full auto sear (transferable) is already very expensive because they are not being manufactured for sale to the public since 1986. So then a full auto that's legal to own is very expensive, but not because it's not been fired. Most of these guns get fired all the time. It's because of the little registration number on the small piece of metal in the receiver that allows someone to build a gun around it over and over. Otherwise the 20,000 dollar Colt M16 is no different than an AR-15 that costs 800.00 at a sporting goods store.

Again, learn about it first, talk about it second. Stop proposing solutions when you don't understand the concept in the 1st place. Just say guns are bad, like the liberal women do, and sit down.

Can you create a sear and modify a handgun or Walmart hunting rifle to fill auto?

[DMC]

Can you create a sear and modify a handgun or Walmart hunting rifle to fill auto?

Absolutely, if it has a semi-auto movement then it already has the energy required to squeeze off another round. All the energy is needed to chamber the round, releasing the firing pin is nothing.

[DMC]

Totally and utterly stupid.

Its much easier today for a larger % of the population to do the deed.
You are "dead" wrong. It's easier to get info & materials.

Here's what you said:

The problem is also technology and information has allowed one Fd up individual to kill a whole bunch of people in a few minutes. It's not just a leader who can take the le of mass murderer.

You didn't mention anything about being easier or harder, so now you've gotten away from your original statement and moved the goalpost.

Technology didn't allow it. It just made it easier. It's always been allowed through simply being possible to do.

[pgardn]

Here's what you said:


You didn't mention anything about being easier or harder, so now you've gotten away from your original statement and moved the goalpost.

Technology didn't allow it. It just made it easier. It's always been allowed through simply being possible to do.

Seriously...? Holy ...


Its implicit in the original statement, especially when I referred to leaders who have access to info, materials and means.
You can't stand wrinkles in your bed can you...

[Blake]

Absolutely, if it has a semi-auto movement then it already has the energy required to squeeze off another round. All the energy is needed to chamber the round, releasing the firing pin is nothing.

Is it possible to make handguns that cannot convert to full auto?

[Th'Pusher]

Seriously...? Holy ...


Its implicit in the original statement, especially when I referred to leaders who have access to info, materials and means.
You can't stand wrinkles in your bed can you...

He’s a pedant.

[DMC]

Is it possible to make handguns that cannot convert to full auto?

They are called revolvers.

[DMC]

Seriously...? Holy ...


Its implicit in the original statement, especially when I referred to leaders who have access to info, materials and means.
You can't stand wrinkles in your bed can you...

You always say something stupid then return with this air of incredulity as if the other person said it instead.

Clean your up. I shouldn't have to point out your own ing statements to you.

[Th'Pusher]

You always say something stupid then return with this air of incredulity as if the other person said it instead.

Clean your up. I shouldn't have to point out your own ing statements to you.

Everyone understood his point but you.

[pgardn]

You always say something stupid then return with this air of incredulity as if the other person said it instead.

Clean your up. I shouldn't have to point out your own ing statements to you.

I have not . So there is nothing to clean up.

"Now you see here, you have moved the goalposts" ... Good lord...

Are you serious? You knew exactly what I was writing but just wanted to be difficult.
You do have a wad up your ass.
I need to write a technical paper for you.

[DMC]

Everyone understood his point but you.

Did you take a poll?

[pgardn]

Everyone understood his point but you.

I admit I am a lazy even sloppy writer on this board.

But holy ...

[Spurminator]

It's very simple to create a sear and modify a receiver to full auto. The full auto sear (transferable) is already very expensive because they are not being manufactured for sale to the public since 1986. So then a full auto that's legal to own is very expensive, but not because it's not been fired. Most of these guns get fired all the time. It's because of the little registration number on the small piece of metal in the receiver that allows someone to build a gun around it over and over. Otherwise the 20,000 dollar Colt M16 is no different than an AR-15 that costs 800.00 at a sporting goods store.

Again, learn about it first, talk about it second. Stop proposing solutions when you don't understand the concept in the 1st place. Just say guns are bad, like the liberal women do, and sit down.

When did I even say anything about full auto? You jumped to the NRA semantics argument strategy a little ahead of schedule there, TSA. No one is impressed by your gun nuttery.

An AR-15 shouldn't be just $800. Period.

[pgardn]

Did you take a poll?

You pick up on my "air of incredulity", but can't understand context and what is implied...

Ok then...

[DMC]

Totally and utterly stupid.

Its much easier today for a larger % of the population to do the deed.
You are "dead" wrong. It's easier to get info & materials.

Seriously...? Holy ...


Its implicit in the original statement, especially when I referred to leaders who have access to info, materials and means.
You can't stand wrinkles in your bed can you...

I have not . So there is nothing to clean up.

"Now you see here, you have moved the goalposts" ... Good lord...

Are you serious? You knew exactly what I was writing but just wanted to be difficult.
You do have a wad up your ass.
I need to write a technical paper for you.

When you say stupid then try to backtrack on it (never admitting you were wrong), it always looks like this... fake incredulity out the ass.

You make some off the wall statement, I point out that you're wrong (not just misunderstood, flat out wrong) and you begin to defend it as if you actually meant what it appears you meant. Now you're saying you didn't mean that. What were you defending again?

[DMC]

You pick up on my "air of incredulity", but can't understand context and what is implied...

Ok then...

See above... pick up on it? You slather it on like butter on a hot muffin.

[pgardn]

See above... pick up on it? You slather it on like butter on a hot muffin.

So you know me but you don't.
Thank you Mrs. Crutchfield for your help.

[DMC]

When did I even say anything about full auto? You jumped to the NRA semantics argument strategy a little ahead of schedule there, TSA. No one is impressed by your gun nuttery.

An AR-15 shouldn't be just $800. Period.

So then any gun that fires a projectile with enough KE to kill a human should be cost prohibitive?