Uh oh. Emo DMC got his gun boner in a twist.
losing side
So then tell that to your buddies here who say an outright ban on guns is uncons utional.
"America's second amendment"
Yeah, I give a what the losing side thinks.
You expect someone to register or pay for that ?
Uh oh. Emo DMC got his gun boner in a twist.
losing side
Last edited by Th'Pusher; 11-25-2017 at 09:37 AM.
cannot even talk without needing to edit
Nuance is tough for DMC. The er interpretation of the 2nd is what it is. There is certainly a valid argument to be made against it and the originalists like Thomas suddenly seem to forget what is written by the founders in their decisions but SCOTUS is the one who makes the decision so all of that is moot.
It's not so much that it is uncons utional as it the judicial reality we live in.
Regardless effective policies like ban of all semiauto sales and transfers, closing the LLC loophole, buybacks, and having police handle all background checks through the already existing waiver system don't require confiscations.
DMC of course has no canned arguments against that so he tries to insist on irrelevant arguments that he sees as winners. Pseudointellectual is as pseudointellectual does.
My phone autocorrected emo to Elmo. I thought it was important to call out your reflexive emotional response to a gun thread.
Remember when Adam Lambert had you spinning like a top?
Sure it did
Adam Lambert
Was that just before I buried him alive?
Puts me on ignore list
Can't stop talking about me
rent free
You mean how you creepily looked up his email address and cross referenced it with other accounts created with the same email address?
Yeah I remember that.
buried him alive
He’s right about your inability to construct a coherent rebuttal to the OP.
losing side
trigger warning
He has risen!
I can't even read the link, idiot. I said so in my first response.
After he swore up and down it wasn't him?
And you... you freaked the out
But you don't give a what the losing side thinks anyway, right?
yeah. I was a little taken aback by the fact that you looked up the email address I used to register my ST account with and then used it to research my personal information. Sue me.
not one single time. im so in your head that youve now invented conversations with me.
Next door neighbor shot her, at 200 yards, what a sharpshooter, except he shot her after daytime hunting hours.
“Supposedly it was 200 yards away.
"The bullet had traveled through her hip and out her back"
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...nl_most&wpmm=1
You can't have it both ways dip .
A. Can't read it
B. Don't give a
Don't piss and moan about "no rebuttal" when it's locked behind a registration wall. I'm not going to register.
Anyone here can read it for themselves.
logging in just to "prove" you weren't neutered
thinking I researched you or know anything at all about you, JP.
paranoid
I can have have it both ways though. You don't give a about what the "losing side says", so why would you bother rebutting what "they" say (as if The Econimist represents the losing side...god, you're such a ing moron)
I don't have to give a about their opinion to rebut it.
That's how debates work. You don't have to be emotionally invested.
You cannot even spell "The Economist"
And you call me a moron
You're so sly. Using those initials you pulled from the email address I used to register with...
paranoid
thinking I'm a moderator
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)