Trump has been accused of more than groping, i.e. rape. Can I talk about that?
Holy , I literally just heard Franken on the radio setting he's trying to handle it (translation: make it go away)
At least wait until his actions are forgotten before you about Trumps groping unless you want to be known as an idiot.
Trump has been accused of more than groping, i.e. rape. Can I talk about that?
on democrats after voting for Gore, Kerry, and Obama x2
probably just mad because you didnt get the obama phone
Your the one talking about him groping. I don't hear you referring to him as the rapist so I think that speaks volumes about what you believe.
Trump has a lot of ty things wrong with him. I guess I can focus on the rape if that will make you happy.
The Access Hollywood tape where he admits to sexual assault is more catchy though.
I could also call him the Money Launderer In Chief.
He is also grossly imcompetant, lazy, and a nasty human being all around. Limiting myself to just the rape-y parts seems to be leaving out.
nope. actually, you wrapped it up in a bs "FACT" when you stated your question to me and it's not fact so go yourself.
you're not that good at googlin'.
only voted twice and both times for the same pos.
you have a lot of ty things wrong with you. keep throwing stones TROLL.
why not believe what your evil witch **** pelosi has to say and allow for due process all you god damn witch hunting dip s.
So you deny voting for gore and Kerry?
put 2 & 2 together dip ... do i need to hold yalls hand for everything?
I just wanted to get your story straight before sharing this post tbh
LOL reading comprehension
At no time did I use Trumps name. I said "if... a billionaire..."
The purpose of the question, was to get you to realize or admit that billionaires have the motive and capacity to squash stories they don't like, even if they are true.
Not my fault, if you suck at reading comprehension.
.
anyone with money could be pointed at as using his or her connections to get off but to claim it as fact is ridiculous. that's all i am saying. if you had proof then i'd agree with you on the "FACT" point but until then it's all whatif's and hypothetical.
i don't disagree with you that money helps buy time.
koriwhat
Why did you lie about voting for al gre and j
hn Kerry?
i might had supported both back when running and though i said i voted for them i can't really recall doing so but i might've... i believe i only voted obama and have only voted twice unless i am really mistaken. it's never been a priority of mine to vote. i was 18 when gore ran and lost in a rigged system. i can remember specifically not voting for gore personally but supporting him because i hated bush at the time like all ty 18 yr olds at the time. now i'm 36 and hate both bush and gore with a passion.
as for kerry, i can't remember actually casting a vote for anyone that time around but maybe? i only really remember walking into the voting polls twice and that was 2008 & 2012. if i voted for kerry it would've been exactly what i did when i voted for obama; anyone but a republican. i just can't really remember but if i did i did.
either way, tell me again how much of a republican i am.
i'm actually on all your sides and can see both pov's. i agree with this and disagree with that. my main issue is the mentality of some on the left but don't get me wrong, there's good and bad in every group. i just run into more people of said craziness on that side then i do on the other.
You wouldn't know since you never use it. I found what I found on Google and linked it, Joseph Smith.
well the JS i am speaking of doesn't refer to Joseph Smith. try again...
You call liberals a disease but you can see both points of view?
dear goodness youre dumber than I remember.
Anywho what other clf tats did you get?
Well it's what I found on Google, Joseph Smith.
you don't remember me and that's the funniest thing of all.... your bs lie you're trying to keep up here fuzzy but why exactly? we need a special council to look at your bs claim. you're too funny with this .
as for liberals, i believe real liberalism died decades ago. what you got now is PC politics and feelings only. same goes for the feminist movement. it's all about feelings. people just need to stop being such pussies.
well i suppose then you're not that bad at googlin'.
Well, if that's how you feel....
Ahh yes the real scotsman argument. You get to determine what "liberalism" is for the world.
So you think that modern liberals don't have policies on issues like the economy, gun control, abortion, education, consolidation, or the like? I guess I don't put it past you being that ignorant.
I keep it up because I knew you back in HS in the 90s. I don't care if you don't believe me. BTW, how do you know that I don't know you? You are just wishcasting.
Sounds like you were a young liberal who had some life failures and instead of taking responsibility joined in with conservatives and blamed your problems on smelly immigrants benefitting from the welfare state
you never met me or else you wouldn't beat around the bush and actually provide some sort of proof. info i provided previously isn't proof to your claim. sorry but that's the truth.
as well, it's not that liberals have no policies... it's their mental for ude i worry about. i get it, most people, including myself, want more out of life and more quality of life for all. it ain't going to happen though.
wowzas! again, agree to disagree but then that still means i am wrong because you're oh so right, right?
I've given proof. You said that you already shared that before. I then asked you to prove that. You never have.
That is where the argument is and your inability to show you gave your full name before speaks for itself.
You said that modern liberals were all about feelings. I pointed out how there were policies that were not feelings. You have now changed your position once again.
It is obvious you are trying to justify your stance after the fact and are full of .
politics aside. prove you know me. prove yourself fuzzy. it's simple really.
you say you provided info, the info i supplied so what exactly did you provide again? stop playing and man up when you claim . ball is in your court. man up or shut the up already. this game is getting so damn old.
Call him whatever you want to call him. If you believe that you already would be calling him The Rapist (sorry Kobe). It just looks pretty stupid on your part ing about groping when Franken is still in the current news for groping, and theres a picture of him laughing while doing it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)