Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[djohn2oo8]

[djohn2oo8]

[djohn2oo8]

[boutons_deux]

aka, Congressional perjury, was she under oath?

[djohn2oo8]

[djohn2oo8]

aka, Congressional perjury, was she under oath?

Yup.

[dabom]

At what point does "I forgot" for a ton of people stop working, and start being a consorted effort to lie as a group?

[TSA]

FBI agent dismissed from Mueller probe changed Comey's description of Clinton to 'extremely careless'

(CNN) A former top counterintelligence expert at the FBI, now at the center of a political uproar for exchanging private messages that appeared to mock President Donald Trump, changed a key phrase in former FBI Director James Comey's description of how former secretary of state Hillary Clinton handled classified information, according to US officials familiar with the matter.

Electronic records show Peter Strzok, who led the investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server as the No. 2 official in the counterintelligence division, changed Comey's earlier draft language describing Clinton's actions as "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," the source said.

The drafting process was a team effort, CNN is told, with a handful of people reviewing the language as edits were made, according to another US official familiar with the matter.

The shift from "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," which may appear pedestrian at first glance, reflected a decision by the FBI that could have had potentially significant legal implications, as the federal law governing the mishandling of classified material establishes criminal penalties for "gross negligence."

Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, raised questions over why the change was made after receiving do ents from the FBI last month, but the iden y of who was behind the edit has not been reported until now.

CNN has also learned that Strzok was the FBI official who signed the do ent officially opening an investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, according to sources familiar with the matter. As the No. 2 official in counterintelligence, Strzok was considered to be one of the bureau's top experts on Russia.

But the news of Strzok's direct role in the statement that ultimately cleared the former Democratic presidential candidate of criminal wrongdoing, now combined with the fact that he was dismissed from special counsel Robert Mueller's team after exchanging private messages with an FBI lawyer that could be seen as favoring Clinton politically, may give ammunition to those seeking ways to discredit Mueller's Russia investigation.

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2017/12/04/p...mey/index.html

[Pavlov]

KT lied on purpose so she can be convicted of a felony and take down Obama, just like Flynn did.

[dabom]

House of cards is falling.

[Pavlov]

FBI agent dismissed from Mueller probe changed Comey's description of Clinton to 'extremely careless'

(CNN) A former top counterintelligence expert at the FBI, now at the center of a political uproar for exchanging private messages that appeared to mock President Donald Trump, changed a key phrase in former FBI Director James Comey's description of how former secretary of state Hillary Clinton handled classified information, according to US officials familiar with the matter.

Electronic records show Peter Strzok, who led the investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server as the No. 2 official in the counterintelligence division, changed Comey's earlier draft language describing Clinton's actions as "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," the source said.

The drafting process was a team effort, CNN is told, with a handful of people reviewing the language as edits were made, according to another US official familiar with the matter.

The shift from "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," which may appear pedestrian at first glance, reflected a decision by the FBI that could have had potentially significant legal implications, as the federal law governing the mishandling of classified material establishes criminal penalties for "gross negligence."

Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, raised questions over why the change was made after receiving do ents from the FBI last month, but the iden y of who was behind the edit has not been reported until now.

CNN has also learned that Strzok was the FBI official who signed the do ent officially opening an investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, according to sources familiar with the matter. As the No. 2 official in counterintelligence, Strzok was considered to be one of the bureau's top experts on Russia.

But the news of Strzok's direct role in the statement that ultimately cleared the former Democratic presidential candidate of criminal wrongdoing, now combined with the fact that he was dismissed from special counsel Robert Mueller's team after exchanging private messages with an FBI lawyer that could be seen as favoring Clinton politically, may give ammunition to those seeking ways to discredit Mueller's Russia investigation.

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2017/12/04/p...mey/index.html

Hey, TSAbot is back!

[boutons_deux]

Yup.

"as described above", neat lawyerly qualification/escape clause. Nasty ing people, Trash's mafiya

[djohn2oo8]

[Chris]

Mueller and his team are under 11 month long criminal investigation by the Justice Department. Possible indictments coming before Christmas.

[Pavlov]

Mueller and his team are under 11 month long criminal investigation by the Justice Department. Possible indictments coming before Christmas.

Did Steve Bannen tell you that?

[Pavlov]

Mueller and his team are under 11 month long criminal investigation by the Justice Department. Possible indictments coming before Christmas.

How could his team be under investigation before it was even formed, Chris?

[DarrinS]

So, when does Hal reboot these things?

[dabom]

Boom X4.

[dabom]

Did Steve Bannen tell you that?

[pgardn]

Extraordinary means? That's how they passed their tax cut last time under Bush. That's how they were trying to repeal the ACA. Extraordinary means would be doing something that could have gotten 8 Democrat votes to get to 60. You have way too much faith in the GOP breaking from Trump, which doesn't make much any sense to me as we're seeing the party being purged and remade in Trump's image.

Yes.

Are you serious? The tax bill is the most important thing possible to the GOP and he got 51/52 votes for it from his senate. He's going to destroy the ACA by getting rid of the mandate, Trump and the billionaires who run the party get a fat windfall, there will be automatic cuts to Medicare and Medicaid from the budget sequester being triggered to pay for that windfall, he's sticking it to blue states with inability to deduct state taxes, he's sticking it to graduate students by increasing their taxes hugely. The wall is just some stupid to get votes, it doesn't matter whether he builds it or not. There is no way to get the coal jobs back but it's a hammer he'll use effectively against Democrats because facts don't matter. This tax bill is ing mission accomplished even if the GOP loses the house and Trump becomes the same lame duck president Obama was after the GOP took the house in 2011.

And Yes.


I will get back.
Good exercise.
Gotta shower
Gotta eat
Gotta watch my Spurs.

[Chris]

“There’s been absolutely no collusion, so we’re very happy.” - Trump

[dabom]

“There’s been absolutely no collusion, so we’re very happy.” - Trump

That guy never lies.

[Pavlov]

“There’s been absolutely no collusion, so we’re very happy.” - Trump

Just multiple convictions for lying about Russian contacts, and it looks like more in the works.

Why did they all lie, Chris?

[Reck]

“There’s been absolutely no collusion, so we’re very happy.” - Trump

Did he say that while eating two bic macs and a pair of filet o fish with a super size order of fries?

[djohn2oo8]

Don't even pay any attention to Chris. He can't go one day without coming to this thread.