Reply With Quote
I don't have daddy issues like you. I'm not too bothered by women looking for a payoff.
It's not because Trump is president, but good luck defending all the sexual harassers, assaulters and pedophiles. Looks like you actively want to defend them tbh.
Do you actively want to defend them, Spurtacular?
I don't have daddy issues like you. I'm not too bothered by women looking for a payoff.
So you're saying every accuser is lying?
Yes or no.
I don't make dumb blanket answers. You should get help for your daddy issues.
You just made a dumb blanket accusation.
As tends to be the case. Doesn't mean I need to say legitimate voices shouldn't be heard. But I don't think you give a damn about legitimacy as you've pretty much presented in your zeal. Get help for your daddy issues, bruh.
That's a dumb blanket statement.Which voices that accuse Trump and Moore do you consider to be legitimate?Doesn't mean I need to say legitimate voices shouldn't be heard.
Presented where? Quote my presentation.But I don't think you give a damn about legitimacy as you've pretty much presented in your zeal.
^^^
You already been exposed. Take care of your daddy issues.
Where?
Quote the passage.
#DaddyIssues
Linking fake quote. That's some desperation right there.
The "fake quote" doesn't contradict your position.
#Gyst
Sure it does.
Sorry I ruined your night.
You had such high hopes.
Same ing meaning, hole:
"for why"?
To make the Republicans the party that defends and rewards sexual harassment, sexual assault and pedophilia.
Nope.
Do you really say "for why" to people? Because that would be incredibly stupid -- like baby talk.
Dispersion... Same meaning, hole.
Yeah, you mad.
Not the same. This is bigger than that. Only the small minded could not see that.
^^^
Unraveled.
Nah, if you want to see someone unravel check out the guy melting down about attribution for an article that was fully attributed.^^^
Unraveled.
An article interspersed with OP commentary is suddenly attribution.Nah, if you want to see someone unravel check out the guy melting down about attribution for an article that was fully attributed.
Linking the article before posting the article has always been attribution.An article interspersed with OP commentary is suddenly attribution.
Wait, are you saying his linking the full article is plagiarism and doing that has always been plagiarism?
Yes or no.
Having someone else write your OP for him, bruh. What you think plagiarism is?
You didn't answer the question, bruh.Having someone else write your OP for him, bruh. What you think plagiarism is?
Are you saying his linking the full article is plagiarism and doing that has always been plagiarism?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions