Reply With Quote
indeed he does... attention is nicely describing fuzzy s ways.
now that i know exactly what his end game was, i guess i can go back to ignoring his bs. dude is a nutcase.
If you have him on ignore, you’re doing it wrong. No one cares what that assclown knows or doesn’t know about you. He craves attention and you’re giving ii to him.
indeed he does... attention is nicely describing fuzzy s ways.
now that i know exactly what his end game was, i guess i can go back to ignoring his bs. dude is a nutcase.
Agree to drop this shtick. For both sides.
I agree with my dude Darrin.
All TMZ up in here without TSA/DarrinS/Chris to class up the threadI'll be dropping some fact bombs in a little bit to get it (the thread) back on track.
All TMZ up in here without TSA/DarrinS/Chris to class up the thread
Pics don't count as classing up the thread. And they don't explain anything. It's like spam.All TMZ up in here without TSA/DarrinS/Chris to class up the thread
We can make fun of repugs without the extra stuff. It's more fun anyways.
you voted that it was super importantWe can make fun of repugs without the extra stuff. It's more fun anyways.
And it was funny in that thread.
Running out of new material, TSA?
This is like 3 month old news.
Judicial Watch: Hillary and Huma Hid Call Logs and Record of Gifts When Leaving Obama State Dept
Hillary Clinton and her aide and confidante Huma Abedin were allowed to take many of their U.S. Department of State records to keep them secret when they left office, according to Judicial Watch.
Judicial Watch has just released do ents showing that taking those records is "contrary to FOIA [Freedom of Information Act] and other laws.”
Screenshot/Judicial Watch
The conservative public interest group said that the two were allowed to carry out multiple boxes of records as they walked out the door of the Obama State Department. They were given a specific notation that they may not be released to the general public under FOIA:
NOTE: The Secretary’s call log, grid and schedules are not classified, however, they would not be released to the general public under FOIA. They are being released to the Secretary with this understanding. [Emphasis in original]
Judicial Watch was given a breakdown of some of the items removed:
Electronic copy of “daily files” — which are word versions of public do ents and non-records: speeches/press statements/photos from the website, a non-record copy of the schedule, a non record copy of the call log, press clips, and agenda of daily activities.
[...]
The new records also show that Huma Abedin was allowed to take five boxes of “physical files” out of the State Department that include records described as “Muslim Engagement Do ents.”
Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images
The group reported that the originals of some do ents were allowed to be taken, with “no indication that a copy was made”:
The most significant of these are her personal correspondence and gift binders, which could reflect Clinton Foundation and Clinton Global Initiative ties.
[...]
The do ents indicate that Clinton removed a physical file of “the log of the Secretary’s gifts with pictures of gifts.”
Gifts are regulated by federal law to avoid a conflict of interest, according to Judicial Watch.
In a press release, Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said the people have a right to review these do ents:
We already know the Obama State Department let Hillary Clinton steal and then delete her government emails, which included classified information. But these new records show that was only part of the scandal. These new do ents show the Obama State Department had a deal with Hillary Clinton to hide her calls logs and schedules, which would be contrary to FOIA and other laws.
Gowdy mode
Democrats Mobilize Against Rod Rosenstein As Inspector General Investigation Zeroes In On FBI
Democrats are attacking Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s credibility after the Department of Justice released text messages showing a top FBI agent on both the Clinton email investigation and the Russia probe rooting for Clinton while he was investigating her and discussing an unknown “insurance policy” against Trump in case he won the election.
The pro-Clinton, anti-Trump messages were, ironically, discovered as part of an investigation into the DOJ and FBI launched by the Department of Justice Office of Inspector General (IG) in response to Democratic politicians demanding a probe into possible anti-Clinton bias at the FBI.
Democratic politicians and left-wing media have attacked Rosenstein’s credibility in response, claiming he should have blocked the messages’ release. (RELATED: ‘We Can’t Take That Risk’ — FBI Officials Discussed ‘Insurance Policy’ Against Trump Presidency)
Democratic Maryland Rep. Jamie Raskin, one of 58 House Democrats to vote in favor impeaching Trump, attacked Rosenstein and the Department of Justice on the House floor on Thursday.
Raskin claimed the release of the text messages show “that there are people in the Department of Justice who apparently are cooperating with this effort to undermine the integrity and the strength of this special counsel investigation.”
The DOJ, Raskin argued, should have withheld the damning messages, which were exchanged on taxpayer-funded cell phones.
Raskin said “the key thing to understand is that all of those text messages are totally irrelevant” and claimed they were nothing more than political opinions.
Democratic California Sen. Dianne Feinstein told Mother Jones on Wednesday that the messages “are being used for propaganda purposes.” She added: “I think there’s an ongoing effort to malign both Bob Mueller and the work that that Special Counsel Office is doing. They are grabbing at every single thing to try to demean him.”
The text messages go well beyond simple political opinions and are part of a larger pattern of bias on Mueller’s team. (RELATED: Top Senate Republican Wants DOJ To Twist Screws On Probe Into FBI Deputy Director McCabe)
Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley noted that some of the texts “appear to go beyond merely expressing a private political opinion, and appear to cross the line into taking some official action to create an ‘insurance policy’ against a Trump presidency.”
Benjamin Wittes, a staunch ally of former FBI director James Comey, claimed in a blog post that the text messages’ publication were part of “a partisan circus.”
Wittes is a close friend of Comey and has been one of his strongest public defenders since he was fired as FBI director. In May, Wittes relayed that Comey had “concerns” about Rosenstein as assistant attorney general. Now, as an internal DOJ investigation sheds light on a troubled FBI under Comey, Wittes is ramping up the attacks on Rosenstein.
“Rosenstein here has, at a minimum, contributed to that circus—at the expense of his own employees. In throwing a career FBI agent and career FBI lawyer to the wolves by authorizing the release to the public of their private text messages—without any finding that they had done anything wrong—he once again sent a message to his workforce that he is not the sort of man with whom you want to share your foxhole,” Wittes wrote on his LawFare blog.
He added a warning: “The DOJ and FBI workforces will not forget that. Nor should they.” (RELATED: Schumer: Intelligence Community May ‘Get Back At’ Trump For Tweet [VIDEO])
Journalists circulated Wittes’ criticism of Rosenstein on social media and left-wing pundits echoed his points.
“These were government do ents – texts on government devices. So the formal privacy claim is limited,” Talking Points Memo publisher Josh Marshall conceded, before arguing: “But let’s be honest. It’s still a massive breach of privacy. Political and personal chit chat and sounding off between two lovers?”
That the DOJ released some of the Strzok texts, Marshall argued, showed that Rosentstein had become “bent and deformed.”
Marshall didn’t note that the DOJ released just a small fraction of the Strzok-Page messages and redacted personal details in the messages it did release.
Former FBI Assistant Director Chris Swecker, who has praised Special Counsel Robert Mueller and his handling of the Russia investigation, said last week that the Strzok scandal reflects “disarray” at the FBI “that is left over from the Comey era.”
In his testimony on Wednesday, Rosenstein said the DOJ “consulted with the inspector general to determine that he had no objection to releasing the material” before doing so. “If he had, we would not have released it,” Rosenstein said.
A report on the IG’s findings is expected sometime in the spring.
Democrats had previously praised both Rosenstein and the IG probe.
“I think Rosenstein is 100 percent honorable, and I think Mueller is a 100 percent professional,” Democratic Rhode Island Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse told Politico in June. “And you know, Mueller has to report to somebody. I’d rather have it be Rosenstein than anybody else I can think of in the department, particularly with [Attorney General Jeff] Sessions recused.”
Democrats were similarly more receptive to the IG’s probe when they suspected anti-Clinton bias at the FBI.
“In our committee one of the things that we say is that we have integrity, and of all the organizations that we have, the FBI is the one that we must have trusted,” Democratic Maryland Rep. Elijah mings told reporters in January following news of the IG probe.
“And I think this investigation by the IG, I don’t know what it will reveal, but you know I think we need to go through that process, because if we’re not careful we will reach a crisis of legitimacy with regard to the very fabric of our country and the fabric–when I say the fabric, I’m talking about organizations like the CIA, FBI and others.”
You went to community college and got a associates in graphic design. Not quite the same thing.
And you continue to throw him under the bus. What a head. Like I said I am glad to never have been your friend.
This is worse than the GiG/Norcal510 feud.
off already.
Fuzzy is interrupting my circle jerk with Chump /stampfoot
“on ignore”
We've been over this before, dim. I'm not Chump and Reck. I don't want to do the round and round with you. That does not mean I will never look at your posts. HAve fun spamming your 4chan/breitbart conspira takes.
Sad to see a classic thread hijacked by some high school bs.
Mueller Sought Emails of Trump Campaign Data Firm
Special counsel asked Cambridge Analytica to hand over employees’ emails, in sign of investigators’ interest in campaign data operation
https://www.wsj.com/articles/mueller...irm-1513296899
Kushner gave his demographic data to CA, which combined it with CA's data, and CA gave it all to Pootin's cyber/hacker army.
CA is owned by extreme right wing billionaire Robert Mercer who finances Breitbart, Bannon, and donated to Trash's campaign
Cambridge Analytica, the shady data firm that might be a key Trump-Russia link, explained
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-polit...r-flynn-russia
Shady data firmwere they the ones responsible for the Russian troll farms and Pokémons?
It's no worse than your incessant mindless deflections,dissembling, and blanket dismissals nor TSA's idiotic conspira spam with Chump round and rounds nor chris and spurt's meme stream.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
