Reply With Quote
Sure it does
See how that works?
I didn't even need some throw-away twitter line.
It really doesn't though. Apparently it's the only thing you're confident in having any conviction about, so you keep going back to it. You must be a big hit at parties
Sure it does
See how that works?
I didn't even need some throw-away twitter line.
You just told us yourself.
Don't you remember?
Somehow this forum managed to function for 12 years before Dingery Clinton was a Presidential nominee. Maybe that's why you weren't around? Couldn't handle other topics?
It all makes sense now. Maybe read up on some other stuff before inserting yourself into every discussion with your re ed tangents. It's not very polite.
You just told us.
Don't you remember?
Would that you you and Chumpdumper?
No, you told everyone in the forum.
Would that you you and Chumpdumper?
It's the only thing you ever committed to here.
lol
12 years but for some reason you felt the need to create an alt and in your own threads. What if I inserted myself into every discussion using an alt, like you did? Would that make my main account less culpable?
Do you represent the forum?
Has nothing to do with what you told the entire forum.
I guess you can delete it or flip flop. It's your prerogative.
Until then, lol.
See, it's just weird how you aways change the subject like this to things that you imagine to be insulting. "Oh yeah? Hillary lost." "Oh yeah? You have an alt." "Oh yeah? Your dog died." It's not the look of an emotionally stable, confident person.12 years but for some reason you felt the need to create an alt and in your own threads. What if I inserted myself into every discussion using an alt, like you did? Would that make my main account less culpable?
You mean like when you butted in to the conversation I was having with Aaron, insisiting that I am defensive because perhaps I am uneducated when the entire point of the conversation was that the vote wasn't decided by degree vs non-degree but from Aaron's own article:
"But voters who agreed with the statement “people like me don't have any say about what the government does” were 86.5 percent more likely to prefer Trump. This feeling of powerlessness and voicelessness was a much better predictor of Trump support than age, race, college attainment, income, at udes towards Muslims, illegal immigrants, or Hispanic iden y."
You didn't even catch up, you just stepped in and tried to troll me and got your pushed in, again. Seems to be a trend with you, needing every poster on the forum to come to your rescue so you try that with others.
I'll take that as a "No, I don't represent the entire forum"
Didn't think so. Why should I care what you think?
Irrelevant to your own words. They represent themselves.
They're your words, not mine. Don't piss yourself over it. Delete them or flip-flop if they bother you.Why should I care what you think?
All this yapping you've done and you've not really said anything. What are you going to do about it?
I didn't have to say anything -- they're your words.I don't have to do anything about it. You are what you say you are.What are you going to do about it?
Exactly.
Thanks for agreeing with me.
Respond to me if you crave .Thanks for agreeing with me.
I'll buy that for a dollar... I wouldn't necessary say Jimmy Kimmel is any authority to talk about Net Neutrality either, tbh... that's why videos like that are largely a waste of time, IMO.
jimmy kimmel is a fraud to the max... why people even watch that hack is beyond me. that beta loser kimmel.
Just another cog in the propaganda machine. There's actual science to support that your brain is more willing to accept information when you are laughing or in a jovial mood. Kimmel uses this to push the agenda. Avoid at all costs
agree with that. listen to his podcast on occasion. his college lectures are cringeworthy tho imo
Don’t be too harsh. Dude went from Vanna White role on Win Ben Stein’s Money, then was co-host of The Man Show with Adam Carolla, and is now is a political moral compass, giving sober political commentary on his own late night talk show.
He’s progressed a lot from these days
That's because he, like a few others who travel around giving these speeches, have canned answers for questions he knows he's going to get. Even the late, great Christopher Hitchens had that flaw, and you could hear the same responses from debate to debate, and the problem with his claims were often obvious. His opponents though, like him, never cared for the debate. They were all salesmen for their points, which is the same with Ben. They don't talk from a "let's explore this" perspective, but from "here's the canned response, now let me get in these other points I wanted to make while I have air time".
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions