I specifically said OP. I haven't reviewed every one of his posts. Do that for me and get back to me with any errors if it's important to you.
Quite the opposite. Dude followed scripts like a robot.
Yours, yes.This coming from the guy that mocks every conspiracy theory.
I specifically said OP. I haven't reviewed every one of his posts. Do that for me and get back to me with any errors if it's important to you.
Look at you trying to be the politician.
You were here for them.
I did not review them.
Do that for me and point out any errors if it is important to you.
If you don't, it's not important to you. It certainly isn't important to me, but I'll read your report if you post it.
Nobody would take that bet.
report
Go and review the thread and tell me if he made and error.
I already said it's not important to me.
And you proved it isn't important to you either, so why would you want to go on about it?
Guy manages to up Redux as well.
Are djohn's errors in this thread important to you?
Yes or no.
In that they highlight your sanctimony, sure.
Great, then point them all out to me to highlight my sanctimony.
After all, you just said it's important to you.
I inserted a modifier for a reason. You're not that important.
So, not important enough for you to actually point out any of the mistakes you claim are there.
Cool.
Just as I thought.
Now whine about it some more.
On a scale of one to a hundred thousand, I'd say you're a negative four in importance.
Which is why you use the mention function with my name often to get my attention, even in threads where I've never previously posted.
Like here:
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=1#post9231331
And so that makes you feel important?
Getting my attention was important to you.
Somehow I struck a nerve.
so did he ever provide "the links"?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)