Reply With Quote
I have, and I have been. Start paying attention.So much so you are terrified of making a prediction about the OIG report and want to discuss muh sundance.
Tell us what is happening.
Tell us what has been happening.
You won't.
We can discuss the OIG report after we discuss the article you are afraid of discussing.
I have, and I have been. Start paying attention.So much so you are terrified of making a prediction about the OIG report and want to discuss muh sundance.
Tell us what is happening.
Tell us what has been happening.
You won't.
demands
If you don't want to discuss the actual OIG report, just say so. I can tell you're terrified. There is absolutely no reason to prefer discussing muh sundance.
and mike brown's hands were indeed UP
But you won't now.
Everyone is paying attention to your being a complete pussy when asked direct questions.
Ive already discussed the OIG and am open to discussing more of the OIG, your terrified line is just more projection. Sundance article is well worth discussing and puts more facts and dates together than any other article I’ve found.
If you don't want to discuss the actual OIG report, just say so. I can tell you're terrified. There is absolutely no reason to prefer discussing muh sundance.
Post what you think Sundance got wrong and let’s discuss. You claimed the article was full of likelys so this shouldn’t be a difficult task for you.
I honestly quit giving a about any of this stuff with the administration or politics. I can't keep track off all the different issues and all the different names involved. Everyday, there's a new story about Trump or an update on a older one.
I figured since I can't do anything about it, I don't need to waste anymore time following it.
Then let's discuss it without stupid conditions of discussing muh sundance first.
Are you willing to do that?
Yes or no.
No.
You’re still trying to squirm out of refuting a single point you took issue with from any of the Sundance article.
What claims did Sundance make that provably false?
Were any of the dates in the timeline laid out incorrect?
wrong account?
Well, we all know what is most important to you here: MUH SUNDANCE
You couldn't look more stupid if you tried.
And now you'll never say anything else about the OIG. This is the hill you die on.
Unless you're lying.
Which you are.
Well, we all know what is most important to you here: MUH SUNDANCE
You couldn't look more stupid if you tried.
And now you'll never say anything else about the OIG. This is the hill you die on.
Unless you're lying.
Which you are.
for as much as you talk on that article you have yet to see you counter a single point from it.
“We” know you won’t. You’re too terrified to discuss it and are working overtime to deflect from answering any questions about it.
I really don't respect anonymous blog posts with six likelys, horribly failed movie references and "unlawful exoneration." Such things make me dismiss such articles out of hand. Nothing you say will change that just as nothing I say will make you stop worshiping the guy.
for as much as you talk on that article you have yet to see you counter a single point from it.
“We” know you won’t. You’re too terrified to discuss it and are working overtime to deflect from answering any questions about it.
But you want to fight about it.
Because you don't want to discuss the OIG report anymore.
Because you know you would have to make a prediction at some point.
And you failed so miserably so many times before.
lol
But great -- let's discuss unlawful exoneration, then we can move on.
What are the unlawful exoneration laws and what are the penalties possible for all those involved in the unlawful exonerations sundance alleges?
coming from the Breakfast Club adoring 100,000+ post 24/7 anonymous blogger
coming from the Breakfast Club adoring 100,000+ post 24/7 anonymous blogger
Happens every time.
Every.
Time.
Sorry, you already made it clear you didn’t want to discuss sundance so we are forced to move on to the OIG.
In 2015, who blocked the OIG from having oversight of the DOJ National Security Division? Who headed the NSD at that time? When did the head of the NSD step down?
You're flailing, dude.
It's not pretty.
Yo TSA I'm gonna give you a win...but then take it away.
Obviously Huma didn't learn how to cover her tracks as well as Hillary.
TSA: I WILL GO NO FURTHER UNTIL WE DISCUSS MUH SUNDANCE
Me: Discusses sundance.
TSA: I WILL NEVER DISCUSS SUNDANCE AGAIN
unlawful exoneration is no where in the article I posted. You dismissed the article for 6 likelys and a poor movie reference. Who’s really the one flailing?
You're flailing, dude.
It's not pretty.
You just quoted me discussing the sundance article touching on the OIG.
You're flailing, dude.
It's not pretty.
In 2015, who blocked the OIG from having oversight of the DOJ National Security Division? Who headed the NSD at that time? When did the head of the NSD step down?
I don’t even know what “win” you are trying give and take away.Yo TSA I'm gonna give you a win...but then take it away.
Obviously Huma didn't learn how to cover her tracks as well as Hillary.
Please explain, I’m sure this will end up lose/lose for you.
Oh, that's sundance from a couple days ago.
STRICTLY OFF LIMITS
There are currently 10 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 10 guests)
Posting Permissions